IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2019i2p169-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade And Manufacturing Companies Risk Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • KULCSÁR Edina

    (Partium Christian University, Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of Economics, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

Risk assumption is a key element of profit generation and hereby of shareholder capital maximizing. Therefore the determination and measurement of risk have become an essential task for companies. The main purpose of this research is to analyse corporate risk of companies acting in two sectors of economy: trade and manufacturing. Financial literature shows many risk quantification methods as variance, standard deviation, etc., but according to present study aims, we use for corporate risk analysis two dynamic risk measures: Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL), Degree of financial Leverage (DFL). The investigation is based on Hungarian companies data for five years (2013-2017). The database used for risk analysis is ensured by data from financial statements of trading companies (1077 companies) and companies operating in the manufacturing sector (638 companies). The calculations were carried out using different packages of R statistics system. In the first part of study, it was calculated the basic statistical characteristics of above mentioned two leverage ratios for trading and manufacturing companies. Then we plot the results with boxplot diagram in order to show the dispersion of investigated data and to ensure a better comparison of results. According to Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL), the results shows, that excepting one period (2014), the manufacturing companies risk level is greater than trade companies. This means that investigated manufacturing enterprises have to reconsider their functioning and to optimize their costs, on aspect of fix costs. In term of Degree of Financial Leverage (DFL), the results obtained show that manufacturing companies’ riskiness is higher than trading firms. This means that have to pay more attention to the level of indebtedness because this may be linked to financial risk. The coefficient of variance show extremely high values which drew attention on great spatial heterogeneity of trade and manufacturing companies in term of Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL) and Degree of Financial Leverage (DFL). We can conclude that solution for a proper risk analysis may be the grouping of companies’ sample by different features.

Suggested Citation

  • KULCSÁR Edina, 2019. "Trade And Manufacturing Companies Risk Analysis," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 169-178, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2019:i:2:p:169-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2019/n2/017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oxelheim, Lars & Wihlborg, Clas, 2008. "Corporate Decision-Making with Macroeconomic Uncertainty: Performance and Risk Management," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195335743.
    2. Stephen C. Gabriel & C. B. Baker, 1980. "Concepts of Business and Financial Risk," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(3), pages 560-564.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deane, Paul & Malcolm, Bill, 2006. "Do Australian woolgrowers manage price risk rationally?," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 3(2), pages 1-7.
    2. Lien, Gudbrand, 2002. "Non-parametric estimation of decision makers' risk aversion," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 75-83, May.
    3. Featherstone, Allen M., 1990. "Optimal Capital Structure as Business Risk Changes," 1990 Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk Meeting, January 28-31, 1990, Sanibel Island, Florida 271544, Regional Research Projects > S-232: Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk.
    4. Wilson, Paul N. & Gundersen, Carl E., 1985. "Financial Risk In Cotton Production," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Anette Ruml & Martin C. Parlasca, 2022. "In‐kind credit provision through contract farming and formal credit markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 402-425, April.
    6. Ifft, Jennifer & Jodlowski, Margaret, 2017. "Federal crop insurance and agricultural credit use," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259120, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Nemessalyi, Zsolt & Madai, Hajnalka & Nabradi, Andras, 2004. "Risk And Risk Management In Hungarian Livestock Production With A Special Regard To Sheep Production," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20233, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Bramma, Keith M., 2000. "Pricing farm loans for credit risk," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123607, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Tégla, Zsolt, 2015. "Economies Of Scale Vegetable Forcing The Utilization Of Geothermal Energy," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 3(Thematic ), pages 1-12.
    10. S. Martin & F. McLeay, 1998. "The Diversity of Farmers' Risk Management Strategies in a Deregulated New Zealand Environment," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 218-233, June.
    11. Komarek, Adam M. & De Pinto, Alessandro & Smith, Vincent H., 2020. "A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    12. Oñate, Carlos Andrés & Ozaki, Vitor Augusto & Bravo-Ureta, Boris, 2016. "Impact Evaluation of the Brazilian crop insurance public program “Proagro Mais”," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236096, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Zylstra, Michael J. & Kilmer, Richard L. & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2003. "Risk Balancing Strategies In The Florida Dairy Industry: An Application Of Conditional Value At Risk," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22021, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Cheng, Mei-luan & Gloy, Brent A., 2008. "The Paradox of Risk Balancing: Do Risk-reducing Policies Lead to More Risk for Farmers?," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6546, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Nabradi, Andras & Madai, Hajnalka, 2007. "Risk And Risk Management In Hungarian Sheep Production," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 1(1), pages 1-5, September.
    16. Turvey, C. G., 2017. "IFAD RESEARCH SERIES 10 - Inclusive finance and inclusive rural transformation," IFAD Research Series 280048, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    17. Oxelheim, Lars, 2019. "Optimal vs satisfactory transparency: The impact of global macroeconomic fluctuations on corporate competitiveness," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 190-206.
    18. Swanepoel, D. S., 1996. "Causes Of Maize Farm Bankruptcy In South Africa: 1970- 1994," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 35(4), December.
    19. Wilson, Paul N. & Eidman, Vernon R., 1983. "An Empirical Test Of The Interval Approach For Estimating Risk Preferences," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Zia ur Rehman, 2016. "Impact of Macroeconomic Variables on Capital Structure Choice: A Case of Textile Industry of Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 55(3), pages 227-239.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate risk; risk measurement; degree of operating leverage; degree of financial leverage; risk analysis; standard deviation; coefficient of variance; quartiles; heterogeneity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2019:i:2:p:169-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.