IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2015i2p117-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bulgarian General Insurance Companies from Solvency II Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ventsislava Chobanova

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

By nature insurance is an activity involving a wide range of risks and uncertainty is generally seen as one of its fundamental and most important characteristics. The tangible exposure to risks and the extremely significant social function of insurance can be outlined as the main contributors for the constantly increasing importance of the insurance companies’ solvency used as leading indicator for their financial health. With regard to the insurance companies’ solvency three key categories of uncertainty can be identified – uncertainty connected with the liabilities’ amount and characteristics, uncertainty connected with the assets and with their sufficiency for covering the continuously emerging volume of payables on their maturity date and uncertainty, arising from the profitability of the future premiums. These three key aspects of the uncertainty as integral characteristics of the insurance business are strongly envisaged in the new European legislation, concerning the solvency of the insurance companies – Solvency II directive. According to the result of the fifth quantitative impact study (QIS 5, performed by EIOPA), based on financial data for the Bulgarian General insurance market for 2009, some of the insurance companies on the market were able to ensure less than 75% coverage of the solvency capital requirement. A comparison between the values of key indicators respectively in 2009 and in 2013 shows that the basic tendencies have not changed. From this perspective there is no ground for stating that today the Bulgarian insurance market has the capacity to fulfill to greater extent Solvency II requirements. It should be also taken into consideration that the time for preparation and adaptation to the new legislation is shrinking. In such a dynamic environment the Bulgarian insurance market is subject to an intensive process of consolidation and relocation of market shares

Suggested Citation

  • Ventsislava Chobanova, 2015. "Bulgarian General Insurance Companies from Solvency II Perspective," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 117-125, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2015:i:2:p:117-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unwe.bg/uploads/Alternatives/09_Chobanova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig Thorburn, 2004. "On the measurement of solvency of insurance companies : recent developments that will alter methodsadopted in emerging markets," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3199, The World Bank.
    2. Emilia Clipici, 2012. "Solvency Ii – The New Eu Solvency Regime On The Insurance Market," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 11(2), pages 112-119.
    3. David F. Babbel & Anthony M. Santomero, 1997. "Risk Management by Insurers: An Analysis of the Process," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 96-16, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duan, Jin-Chuan & Yu, Min-Teh, 2005. "Fair insurance guaranty premia in the presence of risk-based capital regulations, stochastic interest rate and catastrophe risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 2435-2454, October.
    2. Jean-Baptiste, Eslyn L. & Santomero, Anthony M., 2000. "The Design of Private Reinsurance Contracts," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 274-297, July.
    3. Cummins, J. David & Lewis, Christopher M. & Wei, Ran, 2006. "The market value impact of operational loss events for US banks and insurers," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 2605-2634, October.
    4. Moshirian, Fariborz, 2001. "International investment in financial services," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 317-337, February.
    5. Gourieroux, C. & Laurent, J. P. & Scaillet, O., 2000. "Sensitivity analysis of Values at Risk," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(3-4), pages 225-245, November.
    6. J. David Cummins & Georges Dionne & Robert Gagné & Abdelhakim Nouira, 2021. "The costs and benefits of reinsurance," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 46(2), pages 177-199, April.
    7. Ms. Janet Kong & Mr. Manmohan Singh, 2005. "Insurance Companies in Emerging Markets," IMF Working Papers 2005/088, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Yakop, Rubayah & Yusop, Zulkornain & radam, alias & Ismail, Noriszura, 2012. "Camel Rating Approach to Assess the Insurance Operators Financial Strength," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 46(2), pages 3-15.
    9. Baranoff, Etti G. & Sager, Thomas W., 2002. "The relations among asset risk, product risk, and capital in the life insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1181-1197, June.
    10. Vivian Íris Barcelos & Helder Ferreira De Mendonça, 2016. "Securitization And Credit Risk In The Brazilian Economy," Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 115, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    11. J. David Cummins & Richard D. Phillips & Stephen D. Smith, 1997. "Derivatives and corporate risk management: participation and volume decisions in the insurance industry," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 97-12, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    12. Eslyn Jean Baptiste & Anthony M. Santomero, 1998. "The Design of Private Reinsurance Contracts," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 98-32, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    13. DE CEUSTER, Marc J.K. & LI, Jie & ZHANG, Hairui, 2012. "Did federal funds target rate changes affect the market value of insurance companies?," Working Papers 2012027, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    14. Peter F. Christoffersen & Francis X. Diebold, 2000. "How Relevant is Volatility Forecasting for Financial Risk Management?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 82(1), pages 12-22, February.
    15. Bali, Turan G. & Neftci, Salih N., 2003. "Disturbing extremal behavior of spot rate dynamics," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 455-477, September.
    16. J. Cummins & Georges Dionne & Robert Gagné & A. Nouira, 2009. "Efficiency of insurance firms with endogenous risk management and financial intermediation activities," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 145-159, October.
    17. Greg Brunner & Pablo Gottret & Birgit Hansl & Vijayasekar Kalavakonda & Somil Nagpal & Nicole Tapay, 2012. "Private Voluntary Health Insurance : Consumer Protection and Prudential Regulation," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13093, December.
    18. Jordan KJOSEVSKI & Mihail PETKOVSKI & Kiril SIMEONOVSKI, 2022. "The Effects of Individual and Economic Risks and Stress Testing of Non-Life Sector Profitability: The Case of the NorthMacedonian Insurance Sector," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 125-144, April.
    19. Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Vo, Dinh-Tri, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and solvency: The case of the listed EU insurers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 360-369.
    20. George S. Oldfield & Anthony M. Santomero, 1997. "The Place of Risk Management in Financial Institutions," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 95-05, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk; solvency; insurance market; quantitative study; assets; liabilities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2015:i:2:p:117-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.