IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/ddldem/2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Justification of the competition strategy selection for agricultural enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Bogiday Irina

    (Kharkiv National University of Construction and Architecture)

Abstract

The object of research is the process of forming a competitive strategy for agricultural enterprises using the example of the «Agrotrade» Group of Companies (Kharkiv, Ukraine). One of the most problematic places of strategic management of the company is a constant analysis of the competitive environment. The process of creating a competitive strategy is associated with the systematic monitoring of changes in the external and internal environments. In the course of the research, methods of analysis, synthesis, grouping, generalization, abstract-logical, economic-mathematical and graphical methods were used. The process of determining a competitive strategy for agricultural enterprises should take into account the specifics of the industry and the functioning of the national market. It provides for the determination of one's own competitive position and development priorities, based on benchmarking, and based on key indicators of the strategy matrix, using correlation and regression analysis, significant indicators of the consolidated financial statements of an enterprise. The rationale for the choice of indicators should be carried out using regression, it allows to determine some models and the completeness of explanatory factors. The definition of strategic performance indicators of the enterprise allows to adapt and optimize the activities of the company, to accumulate the necessary resources to achieve a specific goal. Based on the results of the analysis of the competitive environment and determining the place of the «Agrotrade» Group of Companies in it, two priority development vectors are identified, corresponding to I. Ansoff «product-market» matrix. The methods of economic and mathematical analysis make it possible to justify the feasibility of introducing a competitive strategy for the innovative development of products. A defined strategy will allow, provided that net profit is increased by at least 22.1 %, significantly improve our own competitive position and move to another, more attractive cluster, characterized by high performance indicators and based on the principles of innovative and technological development. The formation of an effective competitive strategy is a necessary component of a successful enterprise and the key to establishing a high level of industry competitiveness opens up new prospects in the international market.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogiday Irina, 2019. "Justification of the competition strategy selection for agricultural enterprises," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 5(4(49)), pages 12-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/181162
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stark, Christopher E. & Moss, Leeann E. & Hahn, David E., 2002. "Farm Business Goals And Competitive Advantage," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19618, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Brester, Gary W. & Penn, J.B., 1999. "Strategic Business Management Principles For The Agricultural Production Sector In A Changing Global Food System," Policy Issues Papers 29161, Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Trade Research Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brenes, Esteban R. & Montoya, Daniel & Ciravegna, Luciano, 2014. "Differentiation strategies in emerging markets: The case of Latin American agribusinesses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 847-855.
    2. Streeter, Deborah H. & Bills, Nelson L., 2003. "Value-Added Ag-Based Economic Development: A Panacea or False Promise? Part One of a Two-Part Companion Series: What is Value-Added and How Do We Study It?," Working Papers 127189, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    3. Young, Linda M. & Hobbs, Jill E., 2000. "Public Policy Responses To Increased Vertical Linkages In Agri-Food Supply Chains," Research Discussion Papers 29237, Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Trade Research Center.
    4. Branko Mihailović & Ivana Radić Jean & Vesna Popović & Katica Radosavljević & Biljana Chroneos Krasavac & Aleksandra Bradić-Martinović, 2020. "Farm Differentiation Strategies and Sustainable Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Linda M. Young & Jill E. Hobbs, 2002. "Vertical Linkages in Agri-Food Supply Chains: Changing Roles for Producers, Commodity Groups, and Government Policy," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 428-441.
    6. Bernd Pölling, 2016. "Comparison of Farm Structures, Success Factors, Obstacles, Clients’ Expectations and Policy Wishes of Urban Farming’s Main Business Models in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Pölling, Bernd & Sroka, Wojciech & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2017. "Success of urban farming’s city-adjustments and business models—Findings from a survey among farmers in Ruhr Metropolis, Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 372-385.
    8. Šárka Zapletalová, 2016. "Competitive Strategies: A New Perspective on the Internationalization of the Czech Enterprises," Working Papers 0035, Silesian University, School of Business Administration.
    9. Phillips, Jon C. & Peterson, H. Christopher, 2004. "Product Differentiation and Target Marketing by Agricultural Producers," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2004, pages 1-11.
    10. Stark, Christopher E. & Moss, Leeann E. & Hahn, David E., 2002. "Farm Business Goals And Competitive Advantage," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19618, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Boesch Irene & Weber Michael, 2012. "Processor's Preferences and Basic Differentiation Strategies for Potatoes, Milk, and Wheat in Switzerland," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Henson, Spencer & Masakure, Oliver & Boselie, David, 2005. "Private food safety and quality standards for fresh produce exporters: The case of Hortico Agrisystems, Zimbabwe," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 371-384, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.