IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijhr88/v10y2020i4p48-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ontology Application for the Organizational Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Tengku Adil Tengku Izhar
  • Mohd Shamsul Mohd Shoid

Abstract

Data is important in assisting decision-making in relation to the organizational goals. However, the trustworthiness of organizational data in relation to achieving the organizational goals is often questioned because of the vast amount of organizational data available. This paper advances the understanding of the organizational goals model based on ontology. This refers to the importance of assisting the organization to utilize relevant organizational data for decision-making in relation to the organizational goals. Therefore, domain experts and entrepreneurs can make a decision to what extend the organizational goals are achieved. The results show that ontology supports the relationship between the organizational goal elements as an effort to measure organizational data in relation to the organizational goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Tengku Adil Tengku Izhar & Mohd Shamsul Mohd Shoid, 2020. "Ontology Application for the Organizational Goals," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(4), pages 4871-4871, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ijhr88:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:48-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijhrs/article/download/17839/13805
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijhrs/article/view/17839
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simsek, Zeki & Lubatkin, Michael H. & Veiga, John F. & Dino, Richard N., 2009. "The role of an entrepreneurially alert information system in promoting corporate entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 810-817, August.
    2. Zeki Simsek & Michael Lubatkin & John F. Veiga & Richard N. Dino, 2009. "The role of an entrepreneurially alert information system in promoting corporate entrepreneurship," Post-Print hal-02312548, HAL.
    3. Vergidis, K. & Turner, C.J. & Tiwari, A., 2008. "Business process perspectives: Theoretical developments vs. real-world practice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 91-104, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vivien Beattie & Robin Roslender & Sarah Jane Smith, 2013. "Balancing on a Tightrope: Customer Relational Capital, Value Creation and Disclosure," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3-4), pages 19-52.
    2. Lanivich, Stephen E. & Smith, Adam & Levasseur, Ludvig & Pidduck, Robert J. & Busenitz, Lowell & Tang, Jintong, 2022. "Advancing entrepreneurial alertness: Review, synthesis, and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1165-1176.
    3. Eddleston, Kimberly A. & Sieger, Philipp & Bernhard, Fabian, 2019. "From suffering firm to suffering family? How perceived firm performance relates to managers' work-to-family conflict," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 307-321.
    4. Kamal Sakhdari & J. Henri Burgers, 2018. "The moderating role of entrepreneurial management in the relationship between absorptive capacity and corporate entrepreneurship: an attention-based view," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 927-950, December.
    5. Lennart Burger & Ivana Blažková, 2020. "Internal Determinants Promoting Corporate Entrepreneurship in Established Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(2), pages 19-45.
    6. Sanchez-Ruiz, Paul & Wood, Matthew S. & Long-Ruboyianes, Anna, 2021. "Persuasive or polarizing? The influence of entrepreneurs' use of ingratiation rhetoric on investor funding decisions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    7. Manuel Castriotta & Michela Loi & Elona Marku & Ludovica Moi, 2021. "Disentangling the corporate entrepreneurship construct: conceptualizing through co-words," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2821-2863, April.
    8. Lexin Yun & Xiaolin Yao & Wenlong Zhu & Zishan Zhang, 2022. "Evaluating the Effect of Redundant Resources on Corporate Entrepreneurial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Jun Yan & Li Yan, 2017. "Collective Entrepreneurship, Environmental Uncertainty and Small Business Performance: A Contingent Examination," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 26(1), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Silvestro, Rhian, 2014. "Performance topology mapping: understanding the drivers of performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 269-282.
    11. Piotr Senkus & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Aneta Wysokinska-Senkus & Angelika Panka, 2021. "Process Definitions - Critical Literature Review," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 241-255.
    12. Vinícius P. Rodrigues & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Jakob W. Andersen & Tim C. McAloone, 2018. "Evaluating the Potential Business Benefits of Ecodesign Implementation: A Logic Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Verónica Pazos & Ricardo Chalmeta, 0. "Reusing enterprise models to build platform independent computer models," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-45.
    14. Mingook Lee & Sungjoo Lee, 2016. "Evaluating Internal Technological Capabilities in Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Angelis, Jannis Jan & Munik, Juliano, 2013. "Performance measurement systems: A consensual analysis of their roles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 524-542.
    16. Verónica Pazos & Ricardo Chalmeta, 2017. "Reusing enterprise models to build platform independent computer models," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 377-421, May.
    17. Bonney, Maurice & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2014. "Deriving research agendas for manufacturing and logistics systems: A methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 49-61.
    18. Céline Averseng, 2011. "How to structure the complexity without giving up the thematic exhaustiveness of a state of the art in management science? Feedback on the methodological contribution of classification tools of qualit," Post-Print hal-01992760, HAL.
    19. Garcia Martin, Patricia Carolina & Schroeder, Andreas & Ziaee Bigdeli, Ali, 2019. "The value architecture of servitization: Expanding the research scope," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 438-449.
    20. Börner, René & Goeken, Matthias & Rabhi, Fethi, 2012. "SOA development and service identification: A case study on method use, context and success factors," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 189, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijhr88:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:48-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijhrs/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.