IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgt/youmng/v10y2015i4p299-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Creative Class in Poland and Its Impact on Innovation in Polish Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Aneta Karasek

    (Maria Curie Sklodowska University, Poland)

  • Valerij Dermol

    (International School for Social and Business Studies, Slovenia)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate and discuss the importance of the creative class as a significant factor affecting innovation in geographical regions, and to promote the idea of the creative class and its impact at the level of regional innovation. The empirical material was collected and analysed on the basis of data gathered by the Central Statistical Office for years 2009–2013. The data relates to the number of dynamically operating business entities classified as belonging to the creative class. Research results reveal that geographical regions with bigger share of business entities belonging to the creative class show significantly higher level of innovation than regions with lower share of such entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneta Karasek & Valerij Dermol, 2015. "The Creative Class in Poland and Its Impact on Innovation in Polish Regions," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 10(4), pages 299-314.
    • Handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:10:y:2015:i:4:p:299-314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1854-4231/10_299-314.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Lin, 2007. "Innovation, cities, and new work," Working Papers 07-25, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    2. anonymous, 2007. "Bernanke: rules should not stifle innovation," Financial Update, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, vol. 20(2).
    3. Luuk Klomp, 2004. "Innovation Performance and Innovation Policy: the Case of the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 365-374, September.
    4. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    5. ., 2007. "Technological Lock-in and the Role of Innovation," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. G. M.P. Swann, 2009. "The Economics of Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13211.
    7. Li, Changying & Robles, Jack, 2007. "Product innovation and parallel trade," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 417-429, April.
    8. Mamatzakis, E. C., 2003. "Public infrastructure and productivity growth in Greek agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 169-180, October.
    9. Suciu Marta-Christina & Platis Iordache Magdalena & Ivanovici Mina, 2009. "Creative Economy. Determinants And Stakes Of Creativity And Innovation Management. Regional Ingressions," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 208-212, May.
    10. Giuseppe Folloni & Giorgio Vittadini, 2010. "Human Capital Measurement: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 248-279, April.
    11. ., 2007. "Competition and Innovation," Chapters, in: Paul Cook & Sarah Mosedale (ed.), Regulation, Markets and Poverty, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valerij Dermol, 2019. "Relationship between Human Capital and National Culture," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 14(3), pages 173-184.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Mu-Hsuan & Dong, Huei-Ru & Chen, Dar-Zen, 2012. "Globalization of collaborative creativity through cross-border patent activities," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 226-236.
    2. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    3. Juan-Francisco Martínez-Cerdá & Joan Torrent-Sellens & Inés González-González & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí, 2018. "Opening the Black-Box in Lifelong E-Learning for Employability: A Framework for a Socio-Technical E-Learning Employability System of Measurement (STELEM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Tedi Skiti, 2020. "Institutional entry barriers and spatial technology diffusion: Evidence from the broadband industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(7), pages 1336-1361, July.
    5. Timo Tohmo & Jutta Viinikainen, 2017. "Does intersectoral labour mobility pay for academics?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 83-103, October.
    6. Marigee Bacolod & Bernardo S. Blum & William C. Strange, 2010. "Elements Of Skill: Traits, Intelligences, Education, And Agglomeration," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 245-280, February.
    7. Lorenzo Zirulia, 2012. "The role of spillovers in R&D network formation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 83-105, November.
    8. Wagner, Stefan & Goossen, Martin C., 2018. "Knowing me, knowing you: inventor mobility and the formation of technology-oriented alliances," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-007, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    9. Bernadette Power & Gavin C Reid, 2021. "The Impact of Intellectual Property Types on the Performance of Business Start-ups in the USA," Working Papers wp523, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    10. Messinis, George & Ahmed, Abdullahi D., 2013. "Cognitive skills, innovation and technology diffusion," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 565-578.
    11. Faïz Gallouj, 2010. "Les services intensifs en connaissances : processeurs de connaissances et producteurs d’innovation," Post-Print halshs-01114097, HAL.
    12. Gächter, Simon & von Krogh, Georg & Haefliger, Stefan, 2010. "Initiating private-collective innovation: The fragility of knowledge sharing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 893-906, September.
    13. Sverre J. Herstad & Tore Sandven, 2020. "A closer look at the relationship between innovation and employment growth at the firm level," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 375-399, April.
    14. Azagra-Caro,Joaquín M. & Consoli,Davide, 2013. "Knowledge Flows and Public-Private Cooperation across National Contexts," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201304, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), revised 17 Dec 2014.
    15. Pippel, Gunnar, 2013. "Does Partner Type Matter in R&D Collaboration for Environmental Innovation?," IWH Discussion Papers 5/2013, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    16. Katarzyna Szczepanska-Woszczyna & Mohammed Nadeem, 2016. "Multi-level Approach to the ¡°Social Marketing¡± Context for Innovation: Impact on Organizational Relationships," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 24-37, April.
    17. Yi‐Chuan Liao & Kuen‐Hung Tsai, 2019. "Bridging market demand, proactivity, and technology competence with eco‐innovations: The moderating role of innovation openness," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 653-663, May.
    18. Rifat Kamasak & Meltem Yavuz & Gultekin Altuntas, 2016. "Is the relationship between innovation performance and knowledge management contingent on environmental dynamism and learning capability? Evidence from a turbulent market," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 9(2), pages 229-253, August.
    19. Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2014. "Has Medical Innovation Reduced Cancer Mortality?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo, vol. 60(1), pages 135-177.
    20. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:10:y:2015:i:4:p:299-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.