IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal?
[How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]

Author

Listed:
  • Tóth, Balázs

Abstract

Az állam szerepének kérdése mindig is foglalkoztatta a közgazdász-társadalmat. Az egyes gazdaságpolitikai paradigmák kiemelt szerepet szántak az állami beavatkozáshoz fűződő kérdések megvitatásának. Arra azonban, hogy az állam miként is oldja meg feladatait, már kisebb figyelem irányul. A 20. évszázad utolsó harmadában - párhuzamosan a keynesi gazdaságpolitikával - megingott a weberi bürokráciába vetett hit, új, az államháztartás működésének megreformálását célzó irányzatok kerültek előtérbe. Ilyennek tekinthetjük az új közszolgálati menedzsment, a jó kormányzás irányzatát és az új weberiánus megközelítést. Bár ezek a fogalmak különböző elméleti alapokon nyugszanak, sok esetben vezettek hasonló szervezeti változásokhoz. A tanulmány célja megvizsgálni azt, hogy a különböző időszakokban megjelenő államszervezési elméletek milyen kapcsolatban állnak a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal. A feldolgozott irodalmak arra utalnak, hogy az államtól várt szabályozás mértéke (a reguláció vagy a dereguláció irányába történő elmozdulások), valamint az állam és a társadalom viszonya meghatározza az államszervezet formáját, jellemzőit.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: H83.

Suggested Citation

  • Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1954
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2021.2.205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1954
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2021.2.205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2019. "The Concept of Bureaucracy by Max Weber," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 12-18, March.
    2. Voszka, Éva, 2015. "Államosítás, privatizáció és gazdaságpolitika - a főirány széttöredezése [Nationalization and privatization - in the shadow of changing paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 717-748.
    3. William Dunn & David Miller, 2007. "A Critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 345-358, December.
    4. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1999. "More instruments and broader goals: moving toward the post-washington consensus," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 19(1).
    5. Vicente Pina & Lourdes Torres & Ana Yetano, 2009. "Accrual Accounting in EU Local Governments: One Method, Several Approaches," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 765-807.
    6. Oulasvirta, Lasse, 2014. "The reluctance of a developed country to choose International Public Sector Accounting Standards of the IFAC. A critical case study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 272-285.
    7. Irvine Lapsley, 2009. "New Public Management: The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit?1," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(1), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Jean Hartley, 2005. "Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 27-34, January.
    9. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498, Decembrie.
    10. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1999. "More instruments and broader goals: moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 19(1), pages 101-128.
    11. Hood, Christopher, 1995. "The "new public management" in the 1980s: Variations on a theme," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(2-3), pages 93-109.
    12. Kolodko, Grzegorz W., 2000. "A posztszocialista átalakulás tíz éve a gazdaságpolitikai reformokkal kapcsolatos tanulságok [Ten years of post-socialist transition: the lessons for policy reforms]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 197-214.
    13. Bouckaert Geert & Nakrošis Vitalis & Nemec Juraj, 2011. "Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 9-29, July.
    14. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1999. "More instruments and broader goals: moving toward the post-washington consensus," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 19(1), pages 94-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    2. Mari Kobayashi & Kiyoshi Yamamoto & Keiko Ishikawa, 2016. "The Usefulness of Accrual Information in Non‐mandatory Environments: The Case of Japanese Local Government," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(2), pages 153-161, June.
    3. Luiz Fernando de Paula & Fernando Ferrari Filho, 2010. "The spread of Keynesianism in Brazil: The origins and experience of the Brazilian Keynesian Association," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 248-255.
    4. José L. Oreiro & Luiz-Fernando de Paula, 2007. "Strategy for Economic Growth in Brazil: A Post Keynesian Approach," Chapters, in: Phillip Arestis & Michelle Baddeley & John S.L. McCombie (ed.), Economic Growth, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2007. "Whither Russia? A Review of Andrei Shleifer's A Normal Country," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(1), pages 127-146, March.
    6. Hyndman, Noel & McKillop, Donal, 2018. "Public services and charities: Accounting, accountability and governance at a time of change," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 143-148.
    7. Adhikari, Pawan & Kuruppu, Chamara & Matilal, Sumohon, 2013. "Dissemination and institutionalization of public sector accounting reforms in less developed countries: A comparative study of the Nepalese and Sri Lankan central governments," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 213-230.
    8. Elaine Stewart & Ciaran Connolly, 2021. "Recent UK Central Government Accounting Reforms: Claimed Benefits and Experienced Outcomes," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 557-592, September.
    9. Dogaru, Tatiana-Camelia, 2016. "The Effect of Public Administration Reforms under the Post-New Public Management Paradigm," MPRA Paper 94399, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Atul MEHTA & Joysankar BHATTACHARYA, 2018. "Financial sector development and the poor in developing countries: revisiting the access to finance channel," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(3(616), A), pages 153-168, Autumn.
    11. Atul Mehta & Joysankar Bhattacharya, 2017. "What Works Best for the Poor in Rural India," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 18(2), pages 230-245, September.
    12. Pavle Jakovac & Kristijan Lončarić, 2018. "„Asian Way“ - An Alternative to Washington Consensus?," Occasional Publications, in: Financije teorija i suvremena pitanja = Finance - theory and contemporary issues, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 8, pages 173-201, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics.
    13. Lucica Matei & Spyridon Flogaitis (ed.), 2011. "PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE BALKANS - from Weberian bureaucracy to New Public Management," ASsee Online Series, South-Eastern European Administrative Studies – ASsee Online Series, volume 1, number 1, September.
    14. Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina & Hartmann, Till, 2019. "Corruption and Development: A Reappraisal," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    15. Roberto Martino & Phu Nguyen-Van, 2014. "Labour market regulation and fiscal parameters: A structural model for European regions," Working Papers of BETA 2014-19, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    16. Zubir Azhar & Ervina Alfan & Krishnen Kishan & Nurul Husna Assanah, 2022. "Accrual Accounting at Different Levels of the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 36-62, March.
    17. repec:cuf:journl:y:2017:v:18:i:1:moreno-enguix is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Ferry, Laurence & Zakaria, Zamzulaila & Zakaria, Zarina & Slack, Richard, 2018. "Framing public governance in Malaysia: Rhetorical appeals through accrual accounting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 170-183.
    19. Laurence Ferry & Peter Eckersley, 2015. "Budgeting and governing for deficit reduction in the UK public sector: act three 'accountability and audit arrangements'," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 203-210, May.
    20. B. Buylen & J. Christiaens, 2013. "Politics by numbers? An exploration of councillors’ apparent use of financial information during the budget discussion in Flemish municipal councils," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 13/841, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    21. Serkan Degirmenci, 2011. "Do Institutions Matter for Regional Economic Growth and Development? The Case of Turkey," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1180, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.