IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hálózati tanulás az ipar 4.0 korában
[Network learning in the 4.0 era of industry]

Author

Listed:
  • Szabó, Zs. Roland
  • Horváth, Dóra
  • Hortoványi, Lilla

Abstract

A negyedik ipari forradalom sebessége és kiterjedtsége új társadalmi-technológiai kihívás elé állítja a gazdasági szereplőket, amelyet sem önmagukban, sem hagyományos szervezetközi együttműködés és tanulás segítségével nem tudnak megoldani. Magyarország gazdaságpolitikájában döntő szerepe van a további iparosításnak, így az ipar 4.0 sikere kulcsfontosságú az ország számára. Az Ipar 4.0 Nemzeti Technológiai Platform Szövetség 20 meghatározó tagjával készített interjú, valamint az ipar 4.0 kapcsán Magyarországon is meghatározó 109 szakemberrel készített kérdőíves vizsgálat szerint a gazdasági hálózat és szereplőinek együttes fejlődésére és tanulására van szükség, ami hálózati tanulás segítségével érhető el. Ez azt jelenti, hogy egyszerre szükséges a hálózat kultúrájának, értékeinek és operatív gyakorlatainak fejlesztése a hálózat egészében és az egyes csomópontjain (vállalatok, kormányzat, egyetemek stb.) is. A platformnak meghatározó a szerepe mind az együttműködés kialakításában - ami elengedhetetlen a bizalom kiépítésében -, mind a hálózati tanulás irányításában.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: L5, L6, M11, O3, O4, O14, O25.

Suggested Citation

  • Szabó, Zs. Roland & Horváth, Dóra & Hortoványi, Lilla, 2019. "Hálózati tanulás az ipar 4.0 korában [Network learning in the 4.0 era of industry]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 72-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1817
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2019.1.72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1817
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2019.1.72?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    2. David E. Hojman, 2006. "Network Learning and Principal-agent Conflict: Wine-makers in Chile's Colchagua Valley," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 28(2), pages 97-116, August.
    3. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Alojz Krapež, 2016. "A Complex View of Industry 4.0," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, June.
    4. Andrea Gelei & Imre Dobos, 2016. "Mutual Trustworthiness as a Governance Mechanism in Business Relationships – A Dyadic Data Analysis," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 66(4), pages 661-684, December.
    5. Lena Theodoulides, 2006. "Inter-organizational Networking and Innovative Clusters between Small and Medium-Sized Companies," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 28(2), pages 181-191, August.
    6. Marta Götz & Barbara Jankowska, 2017. "Clusters and Industry 4.0 – do they fit together?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 1633-1653, September.
    7. Jeffrey H. Dyer & Kentaro Nobeoka, 2000. "Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 345-367, March.
    8. Anita Derecskei, 2016. "How do leadership styles influence the creativity of employees?," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 38(1), pages 103-118, March.
    9. Bruce Kogut, 2000. "The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 405-425, March.
    10. Ilona Ilvonen & Vilma Vuori, 2013. "Risks and benefits of knowledge sharing in co-opetitive knowledge networks," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 209-223.
    11. Gibb, Jenny & Sune, Albert & Albers, Sascha, 2017. "Network learning: Episodes of interorganizational learning towards a collective performance goal," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 15-25.
    12. Bill McEvily & Alfred Marcus, 2005. "Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(11), pages 1033-1055, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mao, Chongfeng & Yu, Xianyun & Zhou, Qing & Harms, Rainer & Fang, Gang, 2020. "Knowledge growth in university-industry innovation networks – Results from a simulation study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Hao, Bin & Feng, Yanan & Ye, Jiangfeng, 2017. "Building interfirm leadership: A relational identity perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 651-662.
    3. Duk Hee Lee & Il Won Seo & Ho Chull Choe & Hee Dae Kim, 2012. "Collaboration network patterns and research performance: the case of Korean public research institutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 925-942, June.
    4. Haider, Sajjad & Mariotti, Francesca, 2016. "The orchestration of alliance portfolios: The role of alliance portfolio capability," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 127-141.
    5. Foss, Nicolai J. & Pedersen, Torben, 2001. "The MNC as a Knowledge Structure: The Roles of Knowledge Sources and Organizational Instruments for Knowledge Creation and Transfer," Working Papers 12-2001, Copenhagen Business School, Department of International Economics and Management.
    6. Lee, Cheng-Yu & Wang, Ming-Chao & Huang, Yen-Chih, 2015. "The double-edged sword of technological diversity in R&D alliances: Network position and learning speed as moderators," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 450-461.
    7. Martina Fromhold-Eisebith & Claudia Werker, 2013. "Universities’ functions in knowledge transfer: a geographical perspective," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 51(3), pages 621-643, December.
    8. Pinar Ozcan, 2018. "Growing with the market: How changing conditions during market growth affect formation and evolution of interfirm ties," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 295-328, February.
    9. Matthieu Mandard, 2012. "The influence of interorganizational networks on interfirm partnerships [L'influence des réseaux inter-organisationnels sur les partenariats d'entreprises]," Post-Print halshs-00716322, HAL.
    10. Di Ye & Linlin Zheng & Peixu He, 2021. "Industry Cluster Innovation Upgrading and Knowledge Evolution: A Simulation Analysis Based on Small-World Networks," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    11. Gianni Lorenzoni, 2010. "Genesis of a research field: district, network, strategic network," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 14(3), pages 221-239, August.
    12. Liang, Xinning & Liu, Anita M.M., 2018. "The evolution of government sponsored collaboration network and its impact on innovation: A bibliometric analysis in the Chinese solar PV sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7), pages 1295-1308.
    13. Brinkhoff, Sascha & Suwala, Lech & Kulke, Elmar, 2015. "Managing Innovation in ‘Localities of Learning’ in Berlin and Seville," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-31.
    14. Liena Kano, 2018. "Global value chain governance: A relational perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(6), pages 684-705, August.
    15. Bruneel, Johan & D'Este, Pablo & Salter, Ammon, 2010. "Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 858-868, September.
    16. M. Moore, 2021. "Collaboration in Coworking Spaces: Impact on Firm Innovativeness and Business Models," Papers 2111.09866, arXiv.org.
    17. Arun Rai & Xinlin Tang, 2010. "Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 516-542, September.
    18. Foss, Nicolai J. & Pedersen, Torben, 2002. "Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 49-67.
    19. Gustafsson, Robin & Autio, Erkko, 2011. "A failure trichotomy in knowledge exploration and exploitation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 819-831, July.
    20. Agarwal, Rajshree & Croson, Rachel & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2007. "Decision Making in Strategic Alliances: An Experimental Investigation," Working Papers 07-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy
    • L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O4 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.