IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v135y2016i3d10.1007_s10551-014-2475-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Leather for Ethical Consumers in China and Korea: Facilitating Ethical Consumption with Value–Belief–Attitude Logic

Author

Listed:
  • Hye Jung Jung

    (Chung-Ang University)

  • HaeJung Kim

    (University of North Texas)

  • Kyung Wha Oh

    (Chung-Ang University)

Abstract

Using an innovative fabrication technique, eco-friendly faux leather (EFFL) has been newly developed as a green leather alternative for the Chinese and Korean markets. Value–belief–attitude logic drawn from the heuristic-systemic model (Zuckmand and Chaiken in Psychol Mark 15(7):621–642, 1998) and value–belief–norm theory (Stern et al. in Environ Behav 27(6):723–743, 1995) is proposed to explicate the consumer acceptance attitudes toward the EFFL product. The findings from the multi-group structural equation modeling analysis of online data (n = 600) support the relevancy of VBA logic in which utilitarian and hedonic value motivate pro-environmental belief, and the EFFL product attributes significantly mediate belief and positive attitude toward the EFFL product. The discrepancies across two countries and two age cohorts are noteworthy when pro-environmental belief and product-related information lead to different consumer VBA processes in specific market segments. This study presents insights which provide novel opportunities for managerial implementations and theoretical advancements in eco-friendly related subjects and issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Hye Jung Jung & HaeJung Kim & Kyung Wha Oh, 2016. "Green Leather for Ethical Consumers in China and Korea: Facilitating Ethical Consumption with Value–Belief–Attitude Logic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 483-502, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:135:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-014-2475-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2475-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-014-2475-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-014-2475-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffery Bray & Nick Johns & David Kilburn, 2011. "An Exploratory Study into the Factors Impeding Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 597-608, February.
    2. William Low & Eileen Davenport, 2005. "Postcards from the edge: maintaining the 'alternative' character of fair trade," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 143-153.
    3. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    4. Amitai Etzioni, 2004. "The Post Affluent Society," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(3), pages 407-420.
    5. Gilles Laurent & Pierre Chandon & Brian Wansink, 2000. "A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness," Post-Print hal-00458440, HAL.
    6. Holbrook, Morris B & Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1982. "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 132-140, September.
    7. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    8. Loureiro, Maria L. & Lotade, Justus, 2005. "Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 129-138, April.
    9. Caroline Doran, 2009. "The Role of Personal Values in Fair Trade Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 549-563, February.
    10. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    11. Ellen, Pam Scholder, 1994. "Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro-ecological behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 43-52, May.
    12. Kirsty Golding & Ken Peattie, 2005. "In search of a golden blend: perspectives on the marketing of fair trade coffee," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 154-165.
    13. Jeffrey R. Blend & Eileen O. van Ravenswaay, 1999. "Measuring Consumer Demand for Ecolabeled Apples," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(5), pages 1072-1077.
    14. LAURENT, Gilles & CHANDON, Pierre & WANSINK, Brian, 2000. "A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness," HEC Research Papers Series 698, HEC Paris.
    15. Seonaidh McDonald & Caroline J. Oates, 2006. "Sustainability: Consumer Perceptions and Marketing Strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 157-170, May.
    16. Kun Chung & John Eichenseher & Teruso Taniguchi, 2008. "Ethical Perceptions of Business Students: Differences Between East Asia and the USA and Among “Confucian” Cultures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 121-132, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kanungo, Rama Prasad & Gupta, Suraksha & Patel, Parth & Prikshat, Verma & Liu, Rui, 2022. "Digital consumption and socio-normative vulnerability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. HaeJung Maria Kim & Kyung Wha Oh & Hye Jung Jung, 2020. "Socialization on Sustainable Networks: The Case of eBay Green’s Facebook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Maher Badawi & Maria Giovanna Confetto & Maria Palazzo & Maria Antonella Ferri & Mohamed Haffar, 2023. "Towards Ethical Consumption Activities among Tourism Firms: Nexus of Environmental Knowledge, CSR Participation and Psychological Social Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Shraddha Yadav & Yingjiao Xu & Helmut Hergeth, 2024. "Walking the Talk: Unraveling the Influence of the Sustainability Features of Leather Alternatives on Consumer Behavior toward Running Shoes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Dirk C. Moosmayer & Yanyan Chen & Susannah M. Davis, 2019. "Deeds Not Words: A Cosmopolitan Perspective on the Influences of Corporate Sustainability and NGO Engagement on the Adoption of Sustainable Products in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 135-154, August.
    6. Saleh Md Arman & Cecilia Mark-Herbert, 2022. "Ethical Pro-Environmental Self-Identity Practice: The Case of Second-Hand Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Lim, Xin-Jean & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Ngo, Liem Viet & Chan, Kara & Ting, Hiram, 2023. "How do crazy rich Asians perceive sustainable luxury? Investigating the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay a premium price," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Aharon Mohliver & Donal Crilly & Aseem Kaul, 2023. "Corporate social counterpositioning: How attributes of social issues influence competitive response," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1199-1217, May.
    9. Shi Ruo-Fei & Jing-Yun Zeng & Chang-Hyun Jin, 2022. "The Role of Consumer’ Social Capital on Ethical Consumption and Consumer Happiness," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    10. Chorong Youn & Hye Jung Jung, 2021. "Semantic Network Analysis to Explore the Concept of Sustainability in the Apparel and Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Swetarupa Chatterjee & Naman Sreen & Jyoti Rana & Amandeep Dhir & Pradip H. Sadarangani, 2022. "Impact of ethical certifications and product involvement on consumers decision to purchase ethical products at price premiums in an emerging market context," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(4), pages 737-762, December.
    12. Hye Jung Jung & Kyung Wha Oh & HaeJung Maria Kim, 2021. "Country Differences in Determinants of Behavioral Intention towards Sustainable Apparel Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Won Seok Lee & Joonho Moon, 2023. "The Impacts of Subjective Health and Life Expenses on Quality of Life for Korean Elderly People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-11, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christine Gonzalez & Élodie Huré & Karine Picot-Coupey, 2013. "Mobile application value for consumers," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) 201340, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS.
    2. Heitz-Spahn, Sandrine, 2013. "Cross-channel free-riding consumer behavior in a multichannel environment: An investigation of shopping motives, sociodemographics and product categories," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 570-578.
    3. Stephanie Schwipper & Severine Peche & Gertrud Schmitz, 2020. "Mobile Location-Based Services’ Value-in-Use in Inner Cities: Do a Customer’s Shopping Patterns, Prior User Experience, and Sales Promotions Matter?," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 511-564, October.
    4. Ivanova Marusya, 2012. "A Benefit-Based Approach for Increasing the Effectiveness of Promotions," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 59(2), pages 67-82, December.
    5. Han, Liu & Wang, Shanyong & Zhao, Dingtao & Li, Jun, 2017. "The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 185-197.
    6. Wang, Yi-Shun & Yeh, Ching-Hsuan & Liao, Yi-Wen, 2013. "What drives purchase intention in the context of online content services? The moderating role of ethical self-efficacy for online piracy," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 199-208.
    7. Carolyn A. Lin & Xihui Wang & Yukyung Yang, 2023. "Sustainable Apparel Consumption: Personal Norms, CSR Expectations, and Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Shopping Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Pierre Volle & Aïda Mimouni, 2003. "Bénéfices perçus de la fidélisation et qualité relationnelle : une application exploratoire au secteur du transport aérien," Post-Print halshs-00164836, HAL.
    9. Featherman, Mauricio & Jia, Shizhen (Jasper) & Califf, Christopher B. & Hajli, Nick, 2021. "The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. Huré, Elodie & Picot-Coupey, Karine & Ackermann, Claire-Lise, 2017. "Understanding omni-channel shopping value: A mixed-method study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 314-330.
    11. Hsiu‐Hua Chang & Wei‐Jen Chuang, 2021. "Encourage stakeholder engagement in sustainable development: Drivers of consumers themselves benefits and society welfares," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 748-762, March.
    12. Rommel Salvador & Altaf Merchant & Elizabeth Alexander, 2014. "Faith and Fair Trade: The Moderating Role of Contextual Religious Salience," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 353-371, May.
    13. Erifili Papista & Athanasios Krystallis, 2013. "Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 75-92, June.
    14. Atulkar, Sunil & Kesari, Bikrant, 2017. "Satisfaction, loyalty and repatronage intentions: Role of hedonic shopping values," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 23-34.
    15. Kwangyong Kim & Hyun-jun Choi & Sunghyup Sean Hyun, 2020. "Coffee House Consumers’ Value Perception and Its Consequences: Multi-Dimensional Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-9, February.
    16. Alvina Gillani & Smirti Kutaula & Leonidas C. Leonidou & Paul Christodoulides, 2021. "The Impact of Proximity on Consumer Fair Trade Engagement and Purchasing Behavior: The Moderating Role of Empathic Concern and Hypocrisy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 557-577, March.
    17. Khare, Arpita, 2011. "Mall shopping behaviour of Indian small town consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 110-118.
    18. Md. Nekmahmud & Maria Fekete-Farkas, 2020. "Why Not Green Marketing? Determinates of Consumers’ Intention to Green Purchase Decision in a New Developing Nation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-31, September.
    19. Rafael Currás‐Pérez & Consuelo Dolz‐Dolz & María J. Miquel‐Romero & Isabel Sánchez‐García, 2018. "How social, environmental, and economic CSR affects consumer‐perceived value: Does perceived consumer effectiveness make a difference?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 733-747, September.
    20. Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Kaklauskas, Arturas & Bausys, Romualdas & Naumcik, Andrej & Ubarte, Ieva, 2021. "Integrated hedonic-utilitarian valuation of the built environment by neutrosophic INVAR method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:135:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-014-2475-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.