IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ejlwec/v52y2021i2d10.1007_s10657-021-09698-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simple rules for a complex regulatory world: the case of financial regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Mufarrige

    (Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich, and Rosati)

  • Todd J. Zywicki

    (George Mason University)

Abstract

Twenty-five years ago Richard Epstein published Simple Rules for a Complex World, which would go on to become one of Epstein’s most influential works. This essay, prepared for a conference and symposium to celebrate the anniversary of the book, applies the insights of Simple Rules in the context of one of the most complex areas of social and economic regulation, financial regulation. The complexity of modern finance is often thought to require an equally complex regulatory structure to preserve the safety of the financial system and thus Epstein’s approach is inapplicable to this context. We argue that this argument is exactly backwards. Simplicity in the regulatory framework is essential for financial institutions to manage risk and conduct their affairs efficiently and prudently. Complexity, by contrast, begets a variety of destabilizing problems, including the likelihood of regulatory arbitrage and errors by regulators that increase risk. We argue that refashioning financial regulation around Epstein’s concept of simple rules would create a more stable and efficient financial regulatory system.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Mufarrige & Todd J. Zywicki, 2021. "Simple rules for a complex regulatory world: the case of financial regulation," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 285-305, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:52:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10657-021-09698-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10657-021-09698-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10657-021-09698-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10657-021-09698-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aei:rpbook:11048 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Thomas L. Hogan & Scott Burns, 2019. "Has Dodd–Frank affected bank expenses?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 214-236, April.
    3. Todd Zywicki, 2015. "Rent-Seeking, Crony Capitalism, and the Crony Constitution," Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 23(1), pages 77-103.
    4. Klein, Daniel B., 2014. "Knowledge and Coordination: A Liberal Interpretation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199355327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guangyu Mu & Yuhan Wang & Nan Gao & Xiurong Li, 2023. "A Novel Tripartite Evolutionary Game Model for Internet Consumer Financial Regulation," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel B. Klein, 2015. "Economists on the Welfare State and the Regulatory State: Why Don't Any Argue in Favor of One and Against the Other? A Symposium Prologue," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 12(1), pages 2-14, January.
    2. Niklas Elert & Magnus Henrekson, 2019. "The collaborative innovation bloc: A new mission for Austrian economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 295-320, December.
    3. Daniel B. Klein, 2018. "Eugene F. Fama [Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates]," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 15(3), pages 365–375-3, September.
    4. Paul D. Mueller, 2014. "Adam Smith, Politics, and Natural Liberty," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 29(Fall 2014), pages 119-134.
    5. Elert, Niklas & Henrekson, Magnus, 2021. "Innovative Entrepreneurship as a Collaborative Effort: An Institutional Framework," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 17(4), pages 330-435, June.
    6. Daniel B. Klein, 2013. "The Ideological Migration of the Economics Laureates: Introduction and Overview," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 10(3), pages 218-239, September.
    7. Niklas Elert & Magnus Henrekson, 2022. "Collaborative Innovation Blocs and Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: An Ecosystem Perspective," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Karl Wennberg & Christian Sandström (ed.), Questioning the Entrepreneurial State, pages 345-367, Springer.
    8. Erik W. Matson, 2023. "Ethical Economics or Economical Ethics? Considerations out of Carl Menger," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 311-330, June.
    9. Hogan, Thomas L., 2021. "Bank lending and interest on excess reserves: An empirical investigation," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. James Caton, 2017. "Entrepreneurship, search costs, and ecological rationality in an agent-based economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 107-130, March.
    11. Mitchell Langbert & Anthony J. Quain & Daniel B. Klein, 2016. "Faculty Voter Registration in Economics, History, Journalism, Law, and Psychology," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 13(3), pages 422–451-4, September.
    12. Thomas L. Hogan, 2021. "A Review of the Regulatory Impact Analysis of Risk-Based Capital and Related Liquidity Rules," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.
    13. Anthony J. Evans & Vlad Tarko, 2014. "Contemporary Work in Austrian Economics," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 29(Fall 2014), pages 135-157.
    14. Gaganis, Chrysovalantis & Galariotis, Emilios & Pasiouras, Fotios & Staikouras, Christos, 2020. "Bank profit efficiency and financial consumer protection policies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 98-116.
    15. Harrison Searles, 2015. "The Welfare State and Moral Sentiments: A Smith-Hayek Critique of the Evolutionary Left," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 12(2), pages 114–136-1, May.
    16. Matson, Erik W., 2021. "The Edifying Discourses of Adam Smith: Focalism, Commerce, and Serving the Common Good," OSF Preprints uye54, Center for Open Science.
    17. Marek Hudík, 2015. "A preference change or a perception change? A comment on Dietrich and List," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(2), pages 425-431, May.
    18. Mitchell Langbert & Anthony J. Quain & Daniel B. Klein, 2017. "Faculty Voter Registration: Rectifying the Omission of Two Florida Universities," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 14(1), pages 1-55–60, January.
    19. Peter Lewin, 2016. "Plan-coordination: Who needs it?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 299-313, September.
    20. Vlad Tarko, 2013. "Can probability theory deal with entrepreneurship?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(3), pages 329-345, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Hayek; Simple rules; Financial regulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B53 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Austrian
    • D18 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Protection
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:52:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10657-021-09698-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.