IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v16y2018i3d10.1007_s10308-018-0510-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The belt and road initiative: domestic interests, bureaucratic politics and the EU-China relations

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Yu

    (LSE IDEAS–the London School of Economics’ Foreign Policy Think-Tank)

Abstract

This article explores the linkages between domestic affairs and foreign policies in China in fulfilling its grand ambition of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). It examines the complexities in decision-making process of “BRI” inside Beijing’s administration. It departs from the most existing literature on BRI in Europe, which focus upon the geo-economic and geo-political impacts of the BRI. Instead, it adopts an “inside-out” approach by examining the actual policy process with a primary focus to individual actors such as the Party, the government department and the state-owned enterprises as well as individual academics. It also disentangles the intricate relations amongst the Party, the key decision-making institutions and the policy execution entities in determining the final outcome of the BRI. It will finally reflect the extent to which Beijing’s bureaucratic complexities have impacted upon the EU and its member states’ willingness in collaborating or in formally endorsing China’s BRI.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Yu, 2018. "The belt and road initiative: domestic interests, bureaucratic politics and the EU-China relations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 223-236, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:16:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10308-018-0510-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-018-0510-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10308-018-0510-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-018-0510-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allison, Graham T., 1969. "Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 689-718, November.
    2. Allison, Graham T., 1969. "Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 689-718, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Calabrese, Linda & Wang, Yuan, 2023. "Chinese capital, regulatory strength and the BRI: A tale of ‘fractured development’ in Cambodia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Calabrese, Linda & Cao, Yue, 2021. "Managing the Belt and Road: Agency and development in Cambodia and Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Luiza Kostecka-Tomaszewska & Monika Krukowska, 2021. "China's Economic Statecraft: The Role of the Belt and Road Initiative," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 1019-1036.
    4. Anastas Vangeli, 2019. "Diffusion of ideas in the era of the Belt and Road: Insights from China–CEE think tank cooperation," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 421-436, December.
    5. Ben Derudder & Xiang Feng & Wei Shen & Rui Shao & Peter J. Taylor, 2022. "Connections between Asian and European World Cities: Measurement, Analysis, and Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miriam Hartlapp & Julia Metz & Christian Rauh, 2010. "The agenda set by the EU Commission: the result of balanced or biased aggregation of positions?," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 21, European Institute, LSE.
    2. Gaurav Sinha, 2015. "Responding to Complexity: Microfinance MIS Service Providers as Complex Adaptive Systems," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 1(2), pages 163-180, July.
    3. Edward H. Kaplan, 2012. "OR Forum---Intelligence Operations Research: The 2010 Philip McCord Morse Lecture," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1297-1309, December.
    4. Paul Cairney & Federico Toth, 2023. "The politics of COVID-19 experts: comparing winners and losers in Italy and the UK," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(3), pages 392-405.
    5. Ade Muhammad & Utomo S. Putro & Manahan Siallagan & Kyoichi Kijima & Meditya Wasesa, 2021. "System of Diagnostic Systems framework and its application to the disharmony in Indonesian national security," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 31-49, January.
    6. Nutt, Paul C, 1998. "Evaluating Alternatives to Make Strategic Choices," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 333-354, June.
    7. Eben J. Christensen & Steven B. Redd, 2004. "Bureaucrats Versus the Ballot Box in Foreign Policy Decision Making," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(1), pages 69-90, February.
    8. Michael Brecher & Patrick James, 1988. "Patterns of Crisis Management," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(3), pages 426-456, September.
    9. Paul A. Raschky & Liang Choon Wang, 2017. "Reproductive behaviour at the end of the world: the effect of the Cuban Missile Crisis on U.S. fertility," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(56), pages 5722-5727, December.
    10. Gunton, Cameron & Markey, Sean, 2021. "The role of community benefit agreements in natural resource governance and community development: Issues and prospects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Michal Parízek, 2017. "Control, soft information, and the politics of international organizations staffing," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 559-583, December.
    12. Paul DiMaggio, 2017. "Layers of endogeneity—How porous boundaries between state and society complicate institutional change," Rationality and Society, , vol. 29(1), pages 80-90, February.
    13. Arkadiy V. Sakhartov & Timothy B. Folta, 2013. "Rationalizing Organizational Change: A Need for Comparative Testing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1140-1156, August.
    14. Heugens, P.P.M.A.R. & Zyglidopoulos, S.C., 2007. "Unfit to Learn? How Long View Organizations Adapt to Environmental Jolts," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-014-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    15. Kendall Moll, 1974. "International Conflict as a Decision System," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 18(4), pages 555-577, December.
    16. Thomas J. Volgy & Jon E. Quistgaard, 1975. "Learning About the Value of Global Cooperation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(2), pages 349-376, June.
    17. Niittymies, Aleksi & Pajunen, Kalle & Lamberg, Juha-Antti, 2022. "Temporality and firm de-internationalization: Three historical approaches," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(6).
    18. Nutt, Paul C., 2000. "Context, tactics, and the examination of alternatives during strategic decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 159-186, July.
    19. David Davis, 1972. "Consensus or conflict: Alternative strategies for the bureaucratic bargainer," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 21-29, September.
    20. Davis B. Bobrow & Robert T. Kudrle, 1976. "Theory, Policy, and Resource Cartels," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 20(1), pages 3-56, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:16:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10308-018-0510-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.