IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/bmr111/v3y2014i1p75-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Perceptions of the Global Economic Slowdown Impact and Local Risks Adversely Affect Perceived Opportunities and Subsequent Startup Activities

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony T. Robinson
  • James Grayson

Abstract

The Great Recession which began in 2008 is the worst global recession since World War II. Arguably, this global economic slowdown began with failures in financial regulation and housing policies. Undisputable are the adverse effects of this global financial crisis. Worldwide wealth was destroyed. Unemployment rose precipitously. Small businesses and medium businesses found it difficult to access funding sources. Large businesses reduced investments. However, little has been empirically established regarding the effects of the global slowdown on entrepreneurial startups. This study applies a cognitive lens to examine the effects of the perceived global slowdown impact along with the effects of perceived local risks on startup activities when mediated by perceived opportunities. All hypothesized relationships are found to be significant. Equally important, perceived opportunity is found to fully mediate the relationship between perceived global slowdown impact and startup activity. It is also found to partially mediate the relationship between perceived local risks and startup activities. Hence, this manuscript establishes the basis for beginning to understand how the perceived global slowdown impact is relevant for global startup activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony T. Robinson & James Grayson, 2014. "How Perceptions of the Global Economic Slowdown Impact and Local Risks Adversely Affect Perceived Opportunities and Subsequent Startup Activities," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(1), pages 75-84, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:3:y:2014:i:1:p:75-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/download/4460/2556
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/view/4460
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Palich, Leslie E. & Ray Bagby, D., 1995. "Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 425-438, November.
    2. Robert W. Fairlie, 2013. "Entrepreneurship, Economic Conditions, and the Great Recession," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 207-231, June.
    3. Cooper, Arnold C. & Woo, Carolyn Y. & Dunkelberg, William C., 1988. "Entrepreneurs' perceived chances for success," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 97-108.
    4. Wiklund, Johan & Shepherd, Dean, 2005. "Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 71-91, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. K. Das & Bing-Sheng Teng, 1998. "Time and Entrepreneurial Risk Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(2), pages 69-88, January.
    2. Michael Sheppard, 2020. "The relationship between discretionary slack and growth in small firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 195-219, March.
    3. Bradley, Steven W. & Wiklund, Johan & Shepherd, Dean A., 2011. "Swinging a double-edged sword: The effect of slack on entrepreneurial management and growth," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 537-554, September.
    4. Sandri, Serena & Schade, Christian & Mußhoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin, 2010. "Holding on for too long? An experimental study on inertia in entrepreneurs' and non-entrepreneurs' disinvestment choices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 30-44, October.
    5. Jahangir Yadollahi Farsi & Pouria Nouri & Abdollah Ahmadi Kafeshani, 2015. "Exploring the Interconnections between Sense making, Heuristics and Biases in the Field of Entrepreneurship," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 121-128.
    6. Cassar, Gavin & Craig, Justin, 2009. "An investigation of hindsight bias in nascent venture activity," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 149-164, March.
    7. Malgorzata Rembiasz & Paulina Siemieniak, 2021. "The Risk of Undertaking Business Activity from the Perspective of Women in the Context of Covid-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 637-645.
    8. Simon, Mark & Houghton, Susan M. & Aquino, Karl, 2000. "Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 113-134, March.
    9. Rizwan Ullah Khan & Yashar Salamzadeh & Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah & Mazhar Hussain, 2021. "Factors affecting women entrepreneurs’ success: a study of small- and medium-sized enterprises in emerging market of Pakistan," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Najoua Dali & Sana Harbi, 2016. "The Effect of Risk Perception and Cognitive Biases on the Evaluation of Opportunity in Family and Non-Family Entrepreneurs: The Case of Tunisian Entrepreneurs," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 281-312, September.
    11. Burmeister, Katrin & Schade, Christian, 2007. "Are entrepreneurs' decisions more biased? An experimental investigation of the susceptibility to status quo bias," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 340-362, May.
    12. Simon, Mark & Shrader, Rodney C., 2012. "Entrepreneurial actions and optimistic overconfidence: The role of motivated reasoning in new product introductions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 291-309.
    13. Hongyan Fang & John R. Nofsinger, 2009. "Risk Aversion, Entrepreneurial Risk, and Portfolio Selection," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 13(2), pages 25-55, Fall.
    14. Don A. Moore & John M. Oesch & Charlene Zietsma, 2007. "What Competition? Myopic Self-Focus in Market-Entry Decisions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 440-454, June.
    15. Laurent Vilanova & Nadège Marchand & Walid Hichri, 2015. "Financing and advising with (over)confident entrepreneurs: an experimental investigation," Working Papers halshs-01154514, HAL.
    16. Heidenreich, Stefan & Mohr, Alexander & Puck, Jonas, 2015. "Political strategies, entrepreneurial overconfidence and foreign direct investment in developing countries," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 793-803.
    17. Daniela Gimenez-Jimenez & Linda F. Edelman & Alexandra Dawson & Andrea Calabrò, 2022. "Women entrepreneurs’ progress in the venturing process: the impact of risk aversion and culture," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1091-1111, February.
    18. Knight, Gary & Moen, Øystein & Madsen, Tage Koed, 2020. "Antecedents to differentiation strategy in the exporting SME," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    19. Joseph McManus, 2018. "Hubris and Unethical Decision Making: The Tragedy of the Uncommon," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 169-185, April.
    20. Dubard Barbosa, Saulo & Fayolle, Alain & Smith, Brett R., 2019. "Biased and overconfident, unbiased but going for it: How framing and anchoring affect the decision to start a new venture," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 528-557.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:3:y:2014:i:1:p:75-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Lee (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://bmr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.