IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v9y2020i2p11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm’s Performance: Evidence from Jordan

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Abdullah Fayad Altawalbeh

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on the firm’s performance. Corporate governance practices were divided into two groups; board structure and ownership structure. The sample of the study consists of 60 companies from industrial and service sectors that are listed on Amman stock exchange (ASE). Data was gathered manually through the annual financial reports for the period from 2012-2017 results in 366 year-observation. Stata statistical software was used to test the study hypotheses. The results revealed that board meetings frequency and government ownership positively and significantly impact the firm’s performance, these results suggest that board meetings frequency is considered an indicator of the board effectiveness that enhances decision making quality and thus the firm performance, the results suggest that government ownership is providing a helping hand that improves the firm’s performance. The findings also showed that board independence negatively and significantly impact the firm’s performance, this result suggests that independent board members do not guarantee to improve the performance of a firm, and it stays the firm’s responsibility to choose independent board members who are able to exercise effective oversight function for the purpose of enhancing the performance of a firm. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence from developing countries about the impact of corporate governance measures and practices on firms’ performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Abdullah Fayad Altawalbeh, 2020. "Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm’s Performance: Evidence from Jordan," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/17171/10827
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/17171
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duru, Augustine & Iyengar, Raghavan J. & Zampelli, Ernest M., 2016. "The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4269-4277.
    2. Rateb Mohammad Alqatamin, 2018. "Audit Committee Effectiveness and Company Performance: Evidence from Jordan," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(2), pages 1-48, May.
    3. Aymen Ammari & Mohamad Kadria & Abderrazak Ellouze, 2014. "Board Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from French Firms Listed in SBF 120," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 4(3).
    4. Talat Afza & Mian Sajid Nazir, 2015. "Role of Institutional Shareholders’ Activism in Enhancing Firm Performance: The Case of Pakistan," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(4), pages 557-570, August.
    5. Nguyen, Tuan & Locke, Stuart & Reddy, Krishna, 2014. "A dynamic estimation of governance structures and financial performance for Singaporean companies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Mohamed Belkhir, 2006. "Board structure, Ownership structure, and Firm performance : Evidence from Banking," Working Papers halshs-00009115, HAL.
    7. Tang, Jianyun, 2017. "CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of other executives and blockholding outside directors," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 362-372.
    8. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    9. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐De‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 1999. "Corporate Ownership Around the World," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(2), pages 471-517, April.
    10. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    11. Fitriya Fauzi & Stuart Locke, 2012. "Board Structure, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: A Study of New Zealand Listed-Firms," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 8(2), pages 43-67.
    12. Yang, Tina & Zhao, Shan, 2014. "CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 534-552.
    13. Ruchi Kansil & Archana Singh, 2018. "Institutional ownership and firm performance: evidence from Indian panel data," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 250-269.
    14. Bonn, Ingrid, 2004. "Board Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Australia," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 14-24, January.
    15. Raluca Georgiana MOSCU, 2015. "Study On Correlation Between Ceo Duality And Corporate Performance Of Companies Listed On The Bucharest Stock Exchange," Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 4(1), pages 47-53, JULY.
    16. Monica-Violeta Achim & Sorin-Nicolae Borlea & Codruţa Mare, 2016. "Corporate Governance and Business Performance: Evidence for the Romanian Economy," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 458-474, June.
    17. Marc Essen & J. Oosterhout & Michael Carney, 2012. "Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 873-905, December.
    18. Ciftci, Ilhan & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Wood, Geoffrey & Demirbag, Mehmet & Zaim, Selim, 2019. "Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 90-103.
    19. Gillan, Stuart L., 2006. "Recent Developments in Corporate Governance: An Overview," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 381-402, June.
    20. Yi Wang & Judith Oliver, 2009. "Board composition and firm performance variance: Australian evidence," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 196-212, September.
    21. Jingjing Yang & Jing Chi & Martin Young, 2011. "A review of corporate governance in China," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 25(1), pages 15-28, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Mohammad Ahmed & Amjad Ali, 2022. "Proprietorship Structure and Firm Performance in the Context of Tunneling: An Empirical Analysis of Non-Financial Firms in Pakistan," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(4), pages 115-124, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, November.
    2. Haroon ur Rashid Khan & Waqas Bin Khidmat & Osama Al Hares & Naeem Muhammad & Kashif Saleem, 2020. "Corporate Governance Quality, Ownership Structure, Agency Costs and Firm Performance. Evidence from an Emerging Economy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-35, July.
    3. Riaqa Mubeen & Dongping Han & Jaffar Abbas & Iftikhar Hussain, 2020. "The Effects of Market Competition, Capital Structure, and CEO Duality on Firm Performance: A Mediation Analysis by Incorporating the GMM Model Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Gul, Ferdinand A. & Cheng, Louis T.W. & Leung, T.Y., 2011. "Perks and the informativeness of stock prices in the Chinese market," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 1410-1429.
    5. Tolossa Fufa Guluma, 2021. "The impact of corporate governance measures on firm performance: the influences of managerial overconfidence," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. He, Yan & Chiu, Yung-ho & Zhang, Bin, 2015. "The impact of corporate governance on state-owned and non-state-owned firms efficiency in China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 252-277.
    7. Aziz Jaafar & Lynn Hodgkinson & Mao-Feng Kao, 2019. "Ownership Structure, Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence from Taiwan," Working Papers 19011, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    8. Hazar Ben Barka & François Legendre, 2017. "Effect of the board of directors and the audit committee on firm performance: a panel data analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(3), pages 737-755, September.
    9. Lai Trung Hoang & Cuong Cao Nguyen & Baiding Hu, 2017. "Ownership Structure and Firm Performance Improvement: Does it Matter in the Vietnamese Stock Market?," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 36(4), pages 416-428, December.
    10. Liu, Jia & Lister, Roger & Pang, Dong, 2013. "Corporate evolution following initial public offerings in China: A life-course approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-20.
    11. Ahmed Bouteska, 2020. "Do Board Characteristics Affect Bank Performance? Evidence from the Eurozone," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(6), pages 535-548, October.
    12. Ciftci, Ilhan & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Wood, Geoffrey & Demirbag, Mehmet & Zaim, Selim, 2019. "Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 90-103.
    13. Pompei Mititean, 2022. "The Impact Of Corporate Governance Characteristics On Companies’ Financial Performance: Evidence From Romania," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 67(233), pages 113-134, April – J.
    14. Mariana Bunea & Liliana Ionescu Feleaga & Bogdan Stefan Ionescu, 2023. "The CEO characteristics and Romanian banks performance," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 26(4), pages 99-118, December.
    15. Julan Du & Charles Ka Yui Leung & Derek Chu, 2014. "Return Enhancing, Cash-rich or simply Empire-Building? An Empirical Investigation of Corporate Real Estate Holdings," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 17(3), pages 301-357.
    16. Bhatia, Madhur & Gulati, Rachita, 2021. "Board governance and bank performance: A meta- analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    17. Marwan Mansour & Hamzeh Al Amosh & Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Mohammed W. A. Saleh, 2022. "The Relationship between Corporate Governance Quality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Capital Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    18. I Gusti Ngurah Bagus Gunadi & I Gusti Bagus Wiksuana & Ida Bagus Anom Purbawangsa & Henny Rahyuda, 2020. "Impact of Structural Capital and Company Size on the Growth of Firm Value through Financial Performance with Good Corporate Governance as a Moderating Variable: Property and Real Estate Business in In," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 332-352.
    19. Hsu, Shufang & Lin, Shih-Wei & Chen, Wei-Peng & Huang, Jhao-Wei, 2021. "CEO duality, information costs, and firm performance," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    20. Nguyen, Tuan & Locke, Stuart & Reddy, Krishna, 2015. "Ownership concentration and corporate performance from a dynamic perspective: Does national governance quality matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 148-161.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.