IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v64y2016i6p1230-1238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Cost-Sharing in General Resource Selection Games

Author

Listed:
  • Vasilis Gkatzelis

    (Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Konstantinos Kollias

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Tim Roughgarden

    (Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

Abstract

Resource selection games provide a model for a diverse collection of applications where a set of resources is matched to a set of demands. Examples include routing in traffic and in telecommunication networks, service of requests on multiple parallel queues, and acquisition of services or goods with demand-dependent prices. In reality, demands are often submitted by selfish entities (players) and congestion on the resources results in negative externalities for their users. We consider a policy maker that can set a priori rules to minimize the inefficiency induced by selfish players. For example, these rules may assume the form of scheduling policies or pricing decisions. We explore the space of such rules abstracted as cost-sharing methods. We prescribe desirable properties that the cost-sharing method should possess and prove that, in this natural design space, the cost-sharing method induced by the Shapley value minimizes the worst-case inefficiency of equilibria.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasilis Gkatzelis & Konstantinos Kollias & Tim Roughgarden, 2016. "Optimal Cost-Sharing in General Resource Selection Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1230-1238, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:64:y:2016:i:6:p:1230-1238
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2016.1512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1512
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2016.1512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hervé Moulin & Scott Shenker, 2001. "Strategyproof sharing of submodular costs:budget balance versus efficiency," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 18(3), pages 511-533.
    2. Hervé Moulin, 2008. "The price of anarchy of serial, average and incremental cost sharing," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 36(3), pages 379-405, September.
    3. Yossi Azar & Lisa Fleischer & Kamal Jain & Vahab Mirrokni & Zoya Svitkina, 2015. "Optimal Coordination Mechanisms for Unrelated Machine Scheduling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 489-500, June.
    4. Tobias Harks & Max Klimm, 2012. "On the Existence of Pure Nash Equilibria in Weighted Congestion Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 419-436, August.
    5. Martin J. Osborne & Ariel Rubinstein, 1994. "A Course in Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262650401, December.
    6. Tobias Harks & Konstantin Miller, 2011. "The Worst-Case Efficiency of Cost Sharing Methods in Resource Allocation Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1491-1503, December.
    7. Roberto Cominetti & José R. Correa & Nicolás E. Stier-Moses, 2009. "The Impact of Oligopolistic Competition in Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1421-1437, December.
    8. E. G. Coffman & I. Mitrani, 1980. "A Characterization of Waiting Time Performance Realizable by Single-Server Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3-part-ii), pages 810-821, June.
    9. Milchtaich, Igal, 1996. "Congestion Games with Player-Specific Payoff Functions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 111-124, March.
    10. Jason R. Marden & Adam Wierman, 2013. "Distributed Welfare Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 155-168, February.
    11. Cole, Richard & Correa, Jose & Gkatzelis, Vasillis & Mirrokni, Vahab & Olver, Neil, 2015. "Decentralized utilitarian mechanisms for scheduling games," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103081, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Cole, Richard & Correa, José R. & Gkatzelis, Vasilis & Mirrokni, Vahab & Olver, Neil, 2015. "Decentralized utilitarian mechanisms for scheduling games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 306-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fielbaum, Andres & Kucharski, Rafał & Cats, Oded & Alonso-Mora, Javier, 2022. "How to split the costs and charge the travellers sharing a ride? aligning system’s optimum with users’ equilibrium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 956-973.
    2. William N. Caballero & Brian J. Lunday & Darryl K. Ahner, 2020. "Incentive Compatible Cost Sharing of a Coalition Initiative with Probabilistic Inspection and Penalties for Misrepresentation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1021-1055, December.
    3. Tami Tamir, 2023. "Cost-sharing games in real-time scheduling systems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 273-301, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harks, Tobias & von Falkenhausen, Philipp, 2014. "Optimal cost sharing for capacitated facility location games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 187-198.
    2. Philipp von Falkenhausen & Tobias Harks, 2013. "Optimal Cost Sharing for Resource Selection Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 184-208, February.
    3. Tami Tamir, 2023. "Cost-sharing games in real-time scheduling systems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 273-301, March.
    4. Tobias Harks & Max Klimm & Rolf Möhring, 2013. "Strong equilibria in games with the lexicographical improvement property," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(2), pages 461-482, May.
    5. Tobias Harks & Martin Hoefer & Anja Schedel & Manuel Surek, 2021. "Efficient Black-Box Reductions for Separable Cost Sharing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 134-158, February.
    6. Olivier Tercieux & Mark Voorneveld, 2010. "The cutting power of preparation," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 71(1), pages 85-101, February.
    7. Ruben Juarez & Rajnish Kumar, 2013. "Implementing efficient graphs in connection networks," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 54(2), pages 359-403, October.
    8. Marden, Jason R. & Shamma, Jeff S., 2015. "Game Theory and Distributed Control****Supported AFOSR/MURI projects #FA9550-09-1-0538 and #FA9530-12-1-0359 and ONR projects #N00014-09-1-0751 and #N0014-12-1-0643," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    9. Corine M. Laan & Judith Timmer & Richard J. Boucherie, 2021. "Non-cooperative queueing games on a network of single server queues," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 279-301, April.
    10. Dobzinski, Shahar & Mehta, Aranyak & Roughgarden, Tim & Sundararajan, Mukund, 2018. "Is Shapley cost sharing optimal?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 130-138.
    11. Moulin, Hervé, 2010. "An efficient and almost budget balanced cost sharing method," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 107-131, September.
    12. Braat, Jac & Hamers, Herbert & Klijn, Flip & Slikker, Marco, 2019. "A selfish allocation heuristic in scheduling: Equilibrium and inefficiency bound analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 634-645.
    13. Harless, Patrick, 2017. "Wary of the worst: Maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 316-328.
    14. Michal Feldman & Tami Tamir, 2012. "Conflicting Congestion Effects in Resource Allocation Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 529-540, June.
    15. Olivier Brun & Balakrishna Prabhu, 2016. "Worst-case analysis of non-cooperative load balancing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 239(2), pages 471-495, April.
    16. Xiang-Yang Li & Zheng Sun & Weizhao Wang & Wei Lou, 2010. "Cost sharing and strategyproof mechanisms for set cover games," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 259-284, October.
    17. Arthur Carvalho & Kate Larson, 2012. "Sharing Rewards Among Strangers Based on Peer Evaluations," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 253-273, September.
    18. Meunier, Frédéric & Pradeau, Thomas, 2014. "The uniqueness property for networks with several origin–destination pairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 245-256.
    19. Jing Chen & Silvio Micali, 2016. "Leveraging Possibilistic Beliefs in Unrestricted Combinatorial Auctions," Games, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Le Zhang & Lijing Lyu & Shanshui Zheng & Li Ding & Lang Xu, 2022. "A Q-Learning-Based Approximate Solving Algorithm for Vehicular Route Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:64:y:2016:i:6:p:1230-1238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.