IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v19y2017i4p692-712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual Coproduct Technologies: Implications for Process Development and Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Ying-Ju Chen

    (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Brian Tomlin

    (Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755)

  • Yimin Wang

    (W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287)

Abstract

Many industries operate technologies in which multiple outputs (coproducts) are jointly produced. In some settings (“vertical”) the coproducts differ along a performance dimension and are substitutable. In other settings (“horizontal”) the coproducts differ in their applications and are not substitutable. In both cases, three important attributes of a coproduct technology are its processing cost, overall yield, and coproduct split, i.e., the proportion of each output produced. For both vertical and horizontal settings with deterministic market sizes, we characterize the optimal pricing and production decisions of a monopoly firm with two technologies. We establish the necessary and sufficient conditions for dual activation (i.e., using both technologies) to be optimal. Dual activation is driven by differences in marginal costs across the two technologies. There is an additional motive for dual activation in the horizontal setting: the desire to generate a product mix that better resembles the market mix. Building on the optimal production analysis, we characterize the optimal adoption-and-usage strategy of a firm with one incumbent technology considering a new technology. We establish the conditions for which a new technology will displace the incumbent or be used with the incumbent, and highlight some important adoption and usage differences between vertical and horizontal settings. Results are extended to the setting with uncertain market size(s).

Suggested Citation

  • Ying-Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2017. "Dual Coproduct Technologies: Implications for Process Development and Adoption," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 692-712, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:19:y:2017:i:4:p:692-712
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2017.0637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0637
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2017.0637?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles H. Fine & Evan L. Porteus, 1989. "Dynamic Process Improvement," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 580-591, August.
    2. Brian T. Denton & John Forrest & R. John Milne, 2006. "IBM Solves a Mixed-Integer Program to Optimize Its Semiconductor Supply Chain," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 386-399, October.
    3. Deishin Lee, 2012. "Turning Waste into By-Product," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 115-127, January.
    4. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 1998. "Investment Strategies for Flexible Resources," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(8), pages 1071-1078, August.
    5. Mark Ferguson & V. Daniel R. Guide , Jr. & Gilvan C. Souza, 2006. "Supply Chain Coordination for False Failure Returns," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 376-393, August.
    6. Sandra Transchel & Saurabh Bansal & Mrinmay Deb, 2016. "Managing production of high-tech products with high production quality variability," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 1689-1707, March.
    7. Onur Boyabatlı & Paul R. Kleindorfer & Stephen R. Koontz, 2011. "Integrating Long-Term and Short-Term Contracting in Beef Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(10), pages 1771-1787, October.
    8. Gabriel R. Bitran & Stephen M. Gilbert, 1994. "Co-Production Processes with Random Yields in the Semiconductor Industry," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 476-491, June.
    9. Janice E. Carrillo & Cheryl Gaimon, 2000. "Improving Manufacturing Performance Through Process Change and Knowledge Creation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 265-288, February.
    10. Richard L. Marcellus & Maqbool Dada, 1991. "Interactive Process Quality Improvement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(11), pages 1365-1376, November.
    11. Lingxiu Dong & Panos Kouvelis & Xiaole Wu, 2014. "The Value of Operational Flexibility in the Presence of Input and Output Price Uncertainties with Oil Refining Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2908-2926, December.
    12. Steven Nahmias & Kamran Moinzadeh, 1997. "Lot Sizing with Randomly Graded Yields," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 974-989, December.
    13. George Li & S. Rajagopalan, 1998. "Process Improvement, Quality, and Learning Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-1), pages 1517-1532, November.
    14. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2008. "Pricing and Operational Recourse in Coproduction Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 522-537, March.
    15. Terwiesch, Christian & E. Bohn, Roger, 2001. "Learning and process improvement during production ramp-up," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Ying-Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2013. "Coproduct Technologies: Product Line Design and Process Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(12), pages 2772-2789, December.
    17. Onur Boyabatlı & Jason Nguyen & Tong Wang, 2017. "Capacity Management in Agricultural Commodity Processing and Application in the Palm Industry," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 551-567, October.
    18. C. E. Bodington & T. E. Baker, 1990. "A History of Mathematical Programming in the Petroleum Industry," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 117-127, August.
    19. Robert C. Leachman & Robert F. Benson & Chihwei Liu & Dale J. Raar, 1996. "IMPReSS: An Automated Production-Planning and Delivery-Quotation System at Harris Corporation—Semiconductor Sector," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 6-37, February.
    20. Saurabh Bansal & Sandra Transchel, 2014. "Managing Supply Risk for Vertically Differentiated Co-Products," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(9), pages 1577-1598, September.
    21. Tsan Ng & John Fowler & Ivy Mok, 2012. "Robust demand service achievement for the co-production newsvendor," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 327-341.
    22. Lee, Deishin & Tongarlak, Mustafa Hayri, 2017. "Converting retail food waste into by-product," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 944-956.
    23. Nur Sunar & Erica Plambeck, 2016. "Allocating Emissions Among Co-Products: Implications for Procurement and Climate Policy," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 414-428, July.
    24. Wenbin Wang & Mark E. Ferguson & Shanshan Hu & Gilvan C. Souza, 2013. "Dynamic Capacity Investment with Two Competing Technologies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 616-629, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Shuang & Zhang, Jian & Zhang, Juliang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Production/inventory competition between firms with fixed-proportions co-production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 497-509.
    2. Kim, Kihyung, 2020. "Jointly produced metal markets are endogenously unstable," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Zhou, Pin & Xu, He & Wang, Hongwei, 2020. "Value of by-product synergy: A supply chain perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 941-954.
    4. Zhou, Pin & Xu, He & Chen, Jiguang, 2020. "Value of down-conversion policy in a vertical differentiated co-production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Jin, Minyue & Li, Baoyong & Xiong, Yu & Chakraborty, Ratula & Zhou, Yu, 2023. "Implications of coproduction technology on waste management: Who can benefit from the coproduct made of leftover materials?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1248-1259.
    6. Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong & Dai, Rui & Zhu, Guowei, 2019. "Green flexible vs. inflexible capacity strategies for duopoly," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 247-267.
    7. Hezarkhani, Behzad & Demirel, Guven & Bouchery, Yann & Dora, Manoj, 2023. "Can “ugly veg” supply chains reduce food loss?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 117-132.
    8. Lingxiu Dong & Duo Shi & Fuqiang Zhang, 2022. "3D Printing and Product Assortment Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5724-5744, August.
    9. Yen-Ting Lin & Haoying Sun & Shouqiang Wang, 2020. "Designing Sustainable Products Under Coproduction Technology," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1181-1198, November.
    10. Mohammad Ebrahim Arbabian & Shi Chen & Kamran Moinzadeh, 2021. "Capacity Expansions with Bundled Supplies of Attributes: An Application to Server Procurement in Cloud Computing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 191-209, 1-2.
    11. Tao Lu & Ying‐Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2019. "Selling Co‐Products through a Distributor: The Impact on Product Line Design," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 1010-1032, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Pin & Xu, He & Wang, Hongwei, 2020. "Value of by-product synergy: A supply chain perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 941-954.
    2. Yangyang Peng & Xiaolin Xu & Xue Liang & Weili Xue, 2020. "Mismatch risk allocation in a coproduct supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 707-730, August.
    3. Tao Lu & Ying‐Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2019. "Selling Co‐Products through a Distributor: The Impact on Product Line Design," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 1010-1032, April.
    4. Zhou, Pin & Xu, He & Chen, Jiguang, 2020. "Value of down-conversion policy in a vertical differentiated co-production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Ying-Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2013. "Coproduct Technologies: Product Line Design and Process Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(12), pages 2772-2789, December.
    6. Kim, Kihyung, 2020. "Jointly produced metal markets are endogenously unstable," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Mohammad Ebrahim Arbabian & Shi Chen & Kamran Moinzadeh, 2021. "Capacity Expansions with Bundled Supplies of Attributes: An Application to Server Procurement in Cloud Computing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 191-209, 1-2.
    8. Bin Li & Onur Boyabatlı & Buket Avcı, 2023. "Economic and Environmental Implications of Biomass Commercialization in Agricultural Processing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3561-3577, June.
    9. Onur Boyabatlı, 2015. "Supply Management in Multiproduct Firms with Fixed Proportions Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(12), pages 3013-3031, December.
    10. Onur Boyabatlı & Javad Nasiry & Yangfang (Helen) Zhou, 2019. "Crop Planning in Sustainable Agriculture: Dynamic Farmland Allocation in the Presence of Crop Rotation Benefits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2060-2076, May.
    11. Jin, Minyue & Li, Baoyong & Xiong, Yu & Chakraborty, Ratula & Zhou, Yu, 2023. "Implications of coproduction technology on waste management: Who can benefit from the coproduct made of leftover materials?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1248-1259.
    12. Nur Sunar & Erica Plambeck, 2016. "Allocating Emissions Among Co-Products: Implications for Procurement and Climate Policy," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 414-428, July.
    13. Yen-Ting Lin & Haoying Sun & Shouqiang Wang, 2020. "Designing Sustainable Products Under Coproduction Technology," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1181-1198, November.
    14. Suzanne, Elodie & Absi, Nabil & Borodin, Valeria & van den Heuvel, Wilco, 2020. "A single-item lot-sizing problem with a by-product and inventory capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 844-855.
    15. Lee, Deishin & Tongarlak, Mustafa Hayri, 2017. "Converting retail food waste into by-product," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 944-956.
    16. Demeester, Lieven L. & Qi, Mei, 2005. "Managing learning resources for consecutive product generations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 265-283, February.
    17. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lai, Hsing-Hua, 2020. "Pricing and ordering decisions in a supply chain with downward substitution and imperfect process yield," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    18. Transchel, Sandra, 2017. "Inventory management under price-based and stockout-based substitution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 996-1008.
    19. Tim Noparumpa & Burak Kazaz & Scott Webster, 2015. "Wine Futures and Advance Selling Under Quality Uncertainty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 411-426, July.
    20. Atalay Atasu & Charles J. Corbett & Ximin (Natalie) Huang & L. Beril Toktay, 2020. "Sustainable Operations Management Through the Perspective of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 146-157, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:19:y:2017:i:4:p:692-712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.