IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v69y2023i6p3561-3577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and Environmental Implications of Biomass Commercialization in Agricultural Processing

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Li

    (Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Onur Boyabatlı

    (Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178899, Singapore)

  • Buket Avcı

    (Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178899, Singapore)

Abstract

Motivated by the agricultural industries, this paper studies the economic and environmental implications of biomass commercialization; that is, converting organic waste into a saleable product from the perspective of a processor that uses a commodity input to produce both a commodity output and biomass. We characterize the economic value of biomass commercialization and examine how input and output spot price uncertainties affect this value. Using a model calibration, we find that lower input spot price variability or higher output spot price variability or correlation between the two spot prices increases this value for a typical palm oil mill. To measure the environmental impact, we use total expected carbon emissions resulting from profit-maximizing decisions and characterize the change in total expected emissions after commercialization. Our analysis reveals that, although higher biomass demand or biomass price always increases the value of biomass commercialization, these changes are not necessarily environmentally beneficial as they may increase the emissions associated with biomass commercialization. We also characterize conditions under which biomass commercialization is environmentally beneficial or harmful; that is, it leads to a reduction or an increase in the total expected emissions, respectively. In comparison with the existing understanding which does not take into account optimization of operational decisions, our analysis highlights two types of misconceptions (and characterizes the specific conditions under which they appear): (i) we would mistakenly think that biomass commercialization is environmentally beneficial when it is not, and (ii) we would mistakenly think that biomass commercialization is environmentally harmful when it is not.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Li & Onur Boyabatlı & Buket Avcı, 2023. "Economic and Environmental Implications of Biomass Commercialization in Agricultural Processing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3561-3577, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:6:p:3561-3577
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4518
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baris Ata & Deishin Lee & Mustafa H. Tongarlak, 2012. "Optimizing Organic Waste to Energy Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 231-244, April.
    2. Ankur Goel & Fehmi Tanrisever, 2017. "Financial Hedging and Optimal Procurement Policies under Correlated Price and Demand," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(10), pages 1924-1945, October.
    3. Nur Sunar & Erica Plambeck, 2016. "Allocating Emissions Among Co-Products: Implications for Procurement and Climate Policy," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 414-428, July.
    4. Vishal V. Agrawal & Mark Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay & Valerie M. Thomas, 2012. "Is Leasing Greener Than Selling?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 523-533, March.
    5. Deishin Lee, 2012. "Turning Waste into By-Product," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 115-127, January.
    6. David F. Drake & Stefan Spinler, 2013. "OM Forum —Sustainable Operations Management: An Enduring Stream or a Passing Fancy?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 689-700, October.
    7. Onur Boyabatlı & Paul R. Kleindorfer & Stephen R. Koontz, 2011. "Integrating Long-Term and Short-Term Contracting in Beef Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(10), pages 1771-1787, October.
    8. Lingxiu Dong & Panos Kouvelis & Xiaole Wu, 2014. "The Value of Operational Flexibility in the Presence of Input and Output Price Uncertainties with Oil Refining Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2908-2926, December.
    9. Erica L. Plambeck & Terry A. Taylor, 2013. "On the Value of Input Efficiency, Capacity Efficiency, and the Flexibility to Rebalance Them," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 630-639, October.
    10. Onur Boyabatlı & Jason Nguyen & Tong Wang, 2017. "Capacity Management in Agricultural Commodity Processing and Application in the Palm Industry," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 551-567, October.
    11. Onur Boyabatlı, 2015. "Supply Management in Multiproduct Firms with Fixed Proportions Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(12), pages 3013-3031, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yinglong Xin & Yaoqun Xu & Yi Zheng, 2024. "A Study on Green Agricultural Production Decision-Making by Agricultural Cooperatives under Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atalay Atasu & Charles J. Corbett & Ximin (Natalie) Huang & L. Beril Toktay, 2020. "Sustainable Operations Management Through the Perspective of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 146-157, January.
    2. Ying-Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2017. "Dual Coproduct Technologies: Implications for Process Development and Adoption," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 692-712, October.
    3. Onur Boyabatlı & Javad Nasiry & Yangfang (Helen) Zhou, 2019. "Crop Planning in Sustainable Agriculture: Dynamic Farmland Allocation in the Presence of Crop Rotation Benefits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2060-2076, May.
    4. Zhou, Pin & Xu, He & Chen, Jiguang, 2020. "Value of down-conversion policy in a vertical differentiated co-production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Zhou, Pin & Xu, He & Wang, Hongwei, 2020. "Value of by-product synergy: A supply chain perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 941-954.
    6. Jiao Wang & Lima Zhao & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2021. "Operations‐Finance Interface in Risk Management: Research Evolution and Opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 355-389, February.
    7. Kim, Kihyung, 2020. "Jointly produced metal markets are endogenously unstable," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Yongjian Li & Qianzhou Deng & Chi Zhou & Lipan Feng, 2020. "Environmental governance strategies in a two-echelon supply chain with tax and subsidy interactions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 439-462, July.
    9. Bolandifar, Ehsan & Chen, Zhong, 2020. "Hedging through index-based price contracts in commodity-based supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Tao Lu & Ying‐Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2019. "Selling Co‐Products through a Distributor: The Impact on Product Line Design," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 1010-1032, April.
    11. Nur Sunar & Erica Plambeck, 2016. "Allocating Emissions Among Co-Products: Implications for Procurement and Climate Policy," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 414-428, July.
    12. Onur Boyabatlı & Jason Nguyen & Tong Wang, 2017. "Capacity Management in Agricultural Commodity Processing and Application in the Palm Industry," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 551-567, October.
    13. Yangyang Peng & Xiaolin Xu & Xue Liang & Weili Xue, 2020. "Mismatch risk allocation in a coproduct supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 707-730, August.
    14. Ji, Guojun & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Yang, Guangyong, 2014. "Constructing sustainable supply chain under double environmental medium regulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 211-219.
    15. Onur Boyabatlı, 2015. "Supply Management in Multiproduct Firms with Fixed Proportions Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(12), pages 3013-3031, December.
    16. Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu & Li, Gendao & Chan, Hing-Kai & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2013. "Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 15-25.
    17. Christian Mandl & Selvaprabu Nadarajah & Stefan Minner & Srinagesh Gavirneni, 2022. "Data‐driven storage operations: Cross‐commodity backtest and structured policies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2438-2456, June.
    18. Krishnan S. Anand & François C. Giraud-Carrier, 2020. "Pollution Regulation of Competitive Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 4193-4206, September.
    19. Wei Xing & Shanshan Ma & Xuan Zhao & Liming Liu, 2022. "Operational hedging or financial hedging? Strategic risk management in commodity procurement," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3233-3263, August.
    20. Karan Girotra & Serguei Netessine, 2013. "OM Forum —Business Model Innovation for Sustainability," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 537-544, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:6:p:3561-3577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.