IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jmsjnl/v11y2021i2p151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Leadership Styles and Utilization of Evaluation Results

Author

Listed:
  • Edwin Ochieng Okul
  • Raphael O. Nyonje

Abstract

The greatest concern in programme management, given the potential of programme or project evaluations to inform decision-making, remains how to ensure the results of an evaluation are used for the intended purpose and how information from an evaluation process and/or the products are applied to practices and decision-making processes. This article presents a research that sought to explore the degree to which organizational leadership style impacts the use of evaluation findings for programme improvement. Based on the pragmatic paradigm and informed by the Utilization Focused Evaluation Model and Knowledge Use Theory, the research adopted a descriptive and correlational design using mixed methods. The study’s sample comprised of 232 project staff from Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) based in Kisumu Central Sub-County, Kenya. Content analysis method that involved coding and identifying themes from respondents’ responses was used to analyse the qualitative data obtained from key informant interviews. Both percentages and frequencies were used to summarize the quantitative data. The instrument reliability was assessed through pilot testing and Cronbach alpha of 0.908 attained. A hypotheses H01- Leadership style does not significantly influence utilization of evaluation results was tested at α = .05 level of significance, but it was rejected because P = 0.000 < 0.05. The study established a statistically significant relationship between organizational leadership style and the utilization of evaluation results. In so doing, it reinforces the existing literature by helping to understand the way organizational leadership style influences the utilization of evaluation results. It fills a gap in the literature, thereby contributes to the appreciation of the factors that enhance and predict the utilization of evaluation results.

Suggested Citation

  • Edwin Ochieng Okul & Raphael O. Nyonje, 2021. "Organizational Leadership Styles and Utilization of Evaluation Results," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 151-151, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/download/0/0/45992/48970
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/0/45992
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan, James C. & Tipu, Syed A.A., 2013. "Leadership effects on innovation propensity: A two-factor full range leadership model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2116-2129.
    2. Goh, Swee & Richards, Gregory, 1997. "Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 575-583, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Der-Chiang Li & Ching-Yeh Tsai, 2020. "Antecedents of Employees’ Goal Orientation and the Effects of Goal Orientation on E-Learning Outcomes: The Roles of Intra-Organizational Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Pruksapong, Mutarika, 2008. "Organizational Member Learning and the Influential Factors: The Empirical Study of Thailand," MPRA Paper 10946, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Bjekić Radmila & Jelača Maja Strugar & Marić Slobodan, 2019. "The Importance of Active Leadership Style for Organizational Innovativeness," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 57(4), pages 481-495, December.
    4. Agbarakwe, Chineme Beatrice & Amah, Edwinah (PhD) & Okocha, Belemenanya Friday (PhD), 2021. "An Analysis of the Concepts of Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership: The Way Forward?," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(08), pages 265-272, August.
    5. Diego R. Toubes & Noelia Araújo-Vila & José A. Fraiz-Brea, 2021. "Organizational Learning Capacity and Sustainability Challenges in Times of Crisis: A Study on Tourism SMEs in Galicia (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Mario Coccia, 2017. "The relation between typologies of executive and technological performances of nations," IRCrES Working Paper 201701, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY.
    7. Yang Liu & Moses Olabhele Esangbedo & Sijun Bai, 2019. "Adaptability of Inter-Organizational Information Systems Based on Organizational Identity: Some Factors of Partnership for the Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Joaquín Camps & Antonio Majocchi, 2010. "Learning Atmosphere and Ethical Behavior, Does It Make Sense?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 129-147, June.
    9. Anna Maria Ferrari & Lucrezia Volpi & Martina Pini & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando Enrique García-Muiña & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2019. "Building a Sustainability Benchmarking Framework of Ceramic Tiles Based on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, January.
    10. Moingeon, Bertrand & Perrin, Alexandre, 2006. "Knowledge management : a learning mix perspective," HEC Research Papers Series 836, HEC Paris.
    11. Mario Coccia, 2017. "Disruptive technologies and competitive advantage of firms in dynamic markets," IRCrES Working Paper 201704, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY.
    12. Yoruk, Deniz E., 2019. "Dynamics of firm-level upgrading and the role of learning in networks in emerging markets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 341-369.
    13. repec:thr:techub:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:55-78 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mijalce Santa, 2015. "The Learning Organization - An Information Systems Perspective," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11.
    15. Steffen H. Schroeder & Urs Baldegger, 2019. "Empowering Leadership In R&D — Moderating Effects Of The Strategic And Cultural Context," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-29, June.
    16. Chee‐Yang Fong & Keng‐Boon Ooi & Boon‐In Tan & Voon‐Hsien Lee & Alain Yee‐Loong Chong, 2011. "HRM practices and knowledge sharing: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(5/6), pages 704-723, August.
    17. Yuan, Yuan & Hu, May & Cheng, Chen, 2023. "CEO succession and corporate innovation: A managerial myopic perspective," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Gagnon, France & Aubry, Tim & Cousins, J. Bradley & Goh, Swee C. & Elliott, Catherine, 2018. "Validation of the evaluation capacity in organizations questionnaire," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 166-175.
    19. Imran Shafique & Masood Nawaz Kalyar, 2018. "Linking Transformational Leadership, Absorptive Capacity, and Corporate Entrepreneurship," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Joaquín Alegre & Ricardo Chiva, 2009. "Entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning capability and performance in the ceramic tiles industry," Working Papers. Serie EC 2009-08, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    21. Mario Coccia, 2017. "Disruptive firms," Papers 1710.06132, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.