IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/gjbres/v5y2011i5p129-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferable Executives’ Cognitive Style By Stage Of The Organization Life Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Payam Vaseghi
  • Alireza Vaseghi

Abstract

There are too many different perspectives in strategic decision-making process within the literature. The rational normative model suggests that organizations, first, based on internal and external analysis determine some objective criteria to achieve value-maximization, and then based on those objectives make decisions. However, many research findings indicated that rational model is moderated by many individual-level and environmental-level factors. At individual-level, rational decision-making model has been found to be affected greatly, by the characteristics of executives. Among those characteristics, cognition has significant effects on decision-making process. Executives have different cognitive style that makes them follow steps of decision making process -including information gathering, alternative generation, alternative evaluation, and decision finalizing- very differently. From the other side, organizations at different stages of organization life cycle (Introduction, Growth, Maturity and Decline) have different administration needs and required types of decisions. The aim of this conceptual paper is to find out the desirable cognitive style for executives, at each phase of organization life cycle. Additionally, strategy, as the third construct that is related two both cognitive style and organization life cycle help us to explain the cognition-life cycle linkage with more confidence. Based on literature, executives with similar cognitive profile are more likely to follow similar type of strategies; and at each stage of organization life cycle, specific types of strategy is dominant. These findings implicitly support our proposition, indicating that at each stage of organization life cycle, executives with specific cognition profile will outperform. The proposed framework in this paper links strategy, organization life cycle and cognitive style of management.

Suggested Citation

  • Payam Vaseghi & Alireza Vaseghi, 2011. "Preferable Executives’ Cognitive Style By Stage Of The Organization Life Cycle," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(5), pages 129-138.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:5:y:2011:i:5:p:129-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/gjbres/gjbr-v5n5-2011/GJBR-V5N5-2011-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danny Miller & Jean-Marie Toulouse, 1986. "Chief Executive Personality and Corporate Strategy and Structure in Small Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(11), pages 1389-1409, November.
    2. Michael A. Hitt & Beverly B. Tyler, 1991. "Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 327-351, July.
    3. Lindell, Martin, 1991. "How managers should change their style in a business life cycle," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 271-279, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khairul Rizan Mat Ludin & Zakiah Muhammaddun Mohamed & Norman Mohd-Saleh, 2017. "The association between CEO characteristics, internal audit quality and risk-management implementation in the public sector," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 281-300, November.
    2. Schweizer, Lars & Patzelt, Holger, 2012. "Employee commitment in the post-acquisition integration process: The effect of integration speed and leadership," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 298-310.
    3. Zhiang (John) Lin & James A. Kitts & Haibin Yang & J. Richard Harrison, 2008. "Elucidating strategic network dynamics through computational modeling," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 175-208, September.
    4. Fu, Xiaolan, 2012. "How does openness affect the importance of incentives for innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 512-523.
    5. H. Mahesh Prabhu & Amit Kumar Srivastava, 2023. "CEO Transformational Leadership, Supply Chain Agility and Firm Performance: A TISM Modeling among SMEs," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 51-65, March.
    6. Nur Hazelen Mat Rusok Author_Email: hazelen@kelantan.uitm.edu.my & Mohamed Husny Basir & PM Dr. Zainudin Awang & Farahiyah Akmal Mat Nawi, 2011. "The Influence Of Constructive Thought Pattern Strategies On Entrepreneur Innovative Behavior," Annual Summit on Business and Entrepreneurial Studies (ASBES 2011) Proceeding 2011-034-087, Conference Master Resources.
    7. Meissner, Philip & Wulf, Torsten, 2014. "Antecendents and effects of decision comprehensiveness: The role of decision quality and perceived uncertainty," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 625-635.
    8. Michael C. Withers & Kevin G. Corley & Amy J. Hillman, 2012. "Stay or Leave: Director Identities and Voluntary Exit from the Board During Organizational Crisis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 835-850, June.
    9. Gilley, K. Matthew & Greer, Charles R. & Rasheed, Abdul A., 2004. "Human resource outsourcing and organizational performance in manufacturing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 232-240, March.
    10. Paola Rovelli & Vincenzo Butticè, 2020. "On the organizational design of entrepreneurial ventures: the configurations of the entrepreneurial team," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(2), pages 243-269, June.
    11. David R. Williams & Betty S. Coffey & Carlton C. Young, 2018. "Human capital and agency effects on CEO compensation of IPO biopharmaceutical firms and the market’s response," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(2), pages 315-337, June.
    12. Wei, Jiuchang & Ouyang, Zhe & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2018. "CEO characteristics and corporate philanthropic giving in an emerging market: The case of China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-11.
    13. Timothy N. Carroll & Thomas J. Gormley & Vincent J. Bilardo & Richard M. Burton & Keith L. Woodman, 2006. "Designing a New Organization at NASA: An Organization Design Process Using Simulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 202-214, April.
    14. Saeed Janani & Ranjit M. Christopher & Atanas Nik Nikolov & Michael A. Wiles, 2022. "Marketing experience of CEOs and corporate social performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 460-481, May.
    15. Sun, Xiuli & Li, Haizheng & Ghosal, Vivek, 2020. "Firm-level human capital and innovation: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Schul, Patrick L. & Davis, Peter S. & Hartline, Michael D., 1995. "Strategic adaptation to extended rivalry : Effects on organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 129-142, June.
    17. Leonardo Gambacorta & Alessio Reghezza & Martina Spaggiari & Livia Pancotto, 2022. "Gender diversity in bank boardrooms and green lending: evidence from euro area credit register data," BIS Working Papers 1044, Bank for International Settlements.
    18. Hanqing “Chevy†Fang & James J. Chrisman & Daniel T. Holt, 2021. "Strategic Persistence in Family Business," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(4), pages 931-950, July.
    19. Kallias, Antonios & Kallias, Konstantinos & Tsalkamas, Ioannis & Zhang, Song, 2023. "One size does not fit all: The conditional role of CEO education on IPO performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    20. Sitthipongpanich, Thitima & Polsiri, Piruna, 2015. "Do CEO and board characteristics matter? A study of Thai family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 119-129.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cognitive style; organization life cycle; executives’ characteristics; strategic choice model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:5:y:2011:i:5:p:129-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.