IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/gjbres/v12y2018i2p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption Of The Balanced Scorecard By Municipal Governments: Evidence From Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt Schobel
  • Peter Drogosiewicz

Abstract

This paper examines the evolving adoption of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) in municipal governments. We conduct a study of the use of BSCs in municipal governments across Canada. Senior administrators are surveyed regarding the use of performance measures and the results are compared to a similar study conducted in 2004. The results show that municipal governments continue to focus primarily on financial metrics. Adopters recognize the value of a BSC and most no longer see the BSC as a fad or as a set of ad-hoc measures. They recognize the BSC is a valuable tool that links the municipality¡¯s mission and strategy to objective measures. This paper extends the literature on the BSC by identifying a growing desire to improve performance measurement within Canadian municipalities. In addition, understanding the needs, concerns, and reasons for not implementing a BSC will provide practitioners with the necessary information to develop BSC tools that work for a municipal government

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt Schobel & Peter Drogosiewicz, 2018. "Adoption Of The Balanced Scorecard By Municipal Governments: Evidence From Canada," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/gjbres/gjbr-v12n2-2018/GJBR-V12N2-2018-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carol Propper & Deborah Wilson, 2003. "The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 250-267, Summer.
    2. Swee Chua Goh & Catherine Elliott & Greg Richards, 2015. "Performance management in Canadian public organizations: findings of a multi-case study," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 64(2), pages 157-174, February.
    3. Max Moullin, 2017. "Improving and evaluating performance with the Public Sector Scorecard," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 66(4), pages 442-458, April.
    4. Panagiotis Dimitropoulos & Ioannis Kosmas & Ioannis Douvis, 2017. "Implementing the balanced scorecard in a local government sport organization," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 66(3), pages 362-379, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dietrichson, Jens, 2013. "Coordination Incentives, Performance Measurement and Resource Allocation in Public Sector Organizations," Working Papers 2013:26, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    2. Damir Ivankovic & Mircha Poldrugovac & Pascal Garel & Niek S Klazinga & Dionne S Kringos, 2020. "Why, what and how do European healthcare managers use performance data? Results of a survey and workshop among members of the European Hospital and Healthcare Federation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Revelli, Federico & Tovmo, Per, 2007. "Revealed yardstick competition: Local government efficiency patterns in Norway," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 121-134, July.
    4. Francisco Pedraja Chaparro & Javier Salinas Jiménez & María del Mar Salinas Jiménez, 2005. "Los indicadores de gestión en el Sector Público," Revista de Economía y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas, vol. 43(2), pages 109-129, Diciembre.
    5. Helen Simpson, 2009. "Productivity In Public Services," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 250-276, April.
    6. Cañizares-Espada Manuela & Muñoz-Colomina Clara Isabel & Pérez-Estébanez Raquel & Urquía-Grande Elena, 2021. "Transparency and Accessibility in Municipalities: The Case of Social Services in Spain," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 15(5), pages 31-54, June.
    7. repec:thr:techub:1009:y:2020:i:1:p:1-19 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Clare Leaver & Gian Luigi Albano & University College London and ELSE, 2004. "Transparency, Recruitment and Retention in the Public Sector," Economics Series Working Papers 219, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    9. Carol Propper & Deborah Wilson & Simon Burgess, 2005. "Extending Choice In English Health Care: The implications of the economic evidence," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 05/133, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    10. Richard Douglas Kamara, 2020. "Outcomes-based performance management through measuring indicators: Collaborative governance for local economic development (LED) in South African municipalities," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Bagaria, Nitika & Petrongolo, Barbara & Van Reenen, John, 2015. "Can helping the sick hurt the able? Incentives, information and disruption in a disability-related welfare reform," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62566, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Burgess, Simon & Propper, Carol & Gossage, Denise, 2003. "Explaining Differences in Hospital Performance: Does the Answer Lie in the Labour Market?," CEPR Discussion Papers 4118, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Federico Revelli, 2010. "Spend more, get more? An inquiry into English local government performance," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 62(1), pages 185-207, January.
    14. Patrick J. Devlin, 2010. "Exploring efficiency's dominance: the wholeness of the process," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 141-162, June.
    15. Dimitra Petrakaki & Niall Hayes & Lucas Introna, 2009. "Narrowing down accountability through performance monitoring technology," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 160-179, July.
    16. Makris, Miltiadis, 2009. "Incentives for motivated agents under an administrative constraint," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 428-440, August.
    17. Stewart Kaupa & Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku, 2020. "Challenges in the Implementation of Performance Management System in Namibian Public Sector," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 6(2), pages 25-34, June.
    18. Sheila M. Bird & Cox Sir David & Vern T. Farewell & Goldstein Harvey & Holt Tim & Smith Peter C., 2005. "Performance indicators: good, bad, and ugly," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(1), pages 1-27, January.
    19. Propper, Carol & Rigg, John A. & Burgess, Simon, 2005. "Health supplier quality and the distribution of child health," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6252, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Michael Kuhn & Luigi Siciliani, 2009. "Performance Indicators for Quality with Costly Falsification," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 1137-1154, December.
    21. Carol Propper & Simon Burgess & Denise Gossage, 2008. "Competition and Quality: Evidence from the NHS Internal Market 1991-9," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(525), pages 138-170, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Balanced Scorecard; Public Sector; Performance Measurement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other
    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.