IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2016i1p45-d86474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’s New Urban Space Regulation Policies: A Study of Urban Development Boundary Delineations

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuzhou Zhuang

    (Department of Geographic Information Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China)

  • Kaiyuan Li

    (Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China)

  • Jiaxun Liu

    (Department of Geographic Information Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China)

  • Qianwen Cheng

    (Department of Geographic Information Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China)

  • Yu Gao

    (Department of Geographic Information Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China)

  • Jinxia Shan

    (Department of Geographic Information Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China)

  • Lingyan Cai

    (Department of Geographic Information Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China)

  • Qiuhao Huang

    (Department of Geographic Information Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China
    Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China)

  • Yanming Chen

    (Department of Geographic Information Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China
    Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China)

  • Dong Chen

    (Department of Geographic Information Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China)

Abstract

China’s rapid urbanisation has led to ecological deterioration and reduced the land available for agricultural production. The purpose of this study is to develop an urban development boundary delineation (UDBD) model using the high-tech manufacturing area of Xinbei in the District of Changzhou as a case study, and by applying remote sensing, GIS, and other technologies. China’s UDBD policies are reviewed, spatiotemporal changes since 1985 are documented, and future expansion is modelled to 2020. The simulated urban-growth patterns are analysed in relation to China’s policies for farmland preservation, ecological redlines protection areas, and housing developments. The UDBD model developed in this study satisfies regional farmland and ecological space protection constraints, while being consistent with urban development strategies. This study provides theoretical references and technological support for the implementation of land management policies that will optimize land allocations for urban growth, agriculture, and ecological protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuzhou Zhuang & Kaiyuan Li & Jiaxun Liu & Qianwen Cheng & Yu Gao & Jinxia Shan & Lingyan Cai & Qiuhao Huang & Yanming Chen & Dong Chen, 2016. "China’s New Urban Space Regulation Policies: A Study of Urban Development Boundary Delineations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:45-:d:86474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/45/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/45/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brueckner, Jan K., 2007. "Urban growth boundaries: An effective second-best remedy for unpriced traffic congestion?," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3-4), pages 263-273, November.
    2. Anas, Alex & Rhee, Hyok-Joo, 2007. "When are urban growth boundaries not second-best policies to congestion tolls?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 263-286, March.
    3. Ding, Chengri & Knaap, Gerrit J. & Hopkins, Lewis D., 1999. "Managing Urban Growth with Urban Growth Boundaries: A Theoretical Analysis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 53-68, July.
    4. Penghui Jiang & Qianwen Cheng & Yuan Gong & Liyan Wang & Yunqian Zhang & Liang Cheng & Manchun Li & Jiancheng Lu & Yuewei Duan & Qiuhao Huang & Dong Chen, 2016. "Using Urban Development Boundaries to Constrain Uncontrolled Urban Sprawl in China," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(6), pages 1321-1343, November.
    5. Myung-Jin Jun, 2004. "The Effects of Portland's Urban Growth Boundary on Urban Development Patterns and Commuting," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(7), pages 1333-1348, June.
    6. Yang, Xin & Zheng, Xin-Qi & Chen, Rui, 2014. "A land use change model: Integrating landscape pattern indexes and Markov-CA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 283(C), pages 1-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jae Hong Kim, 2013. "Measuring the Containment and Spillover Effects of Urban Growth Boundaries: The Case of the Portland Metropolitan Area," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 650-675, December.
    2. Dan Yi & Xi Guo & Yi Han & Jie Guo & Minghao Ou & Xiaomin Zhao, 2022. "Coupling Ecological Security Pattern Establishment and Construction Land Expansion Simulation for Urban Growth Boundary Delineation: Framework and Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Jou, Jyh-Bang, 2012. "Efficient growth boundaries in the presence of population externalities and stochastic rents," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 349-357.
    4. Jyh-Bang Jou, 2014. "Determinants of Efficient Growth Boundaries with Balanced Budgets and Stochastic Rents," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 93-111, March.
    5. Kono, Tatsuhito & Joshi, Kirti Kusum, 2012. "A new interpretation on the optimal density regulations: Closed and open city," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 223-234.
    6. Pankaj Bajracharya & Selima Sultana, 2022. "Examining the Use of Urban Growth Boundary for Future Urban Expansion of Chattogram, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Hirte, Georg & Tscharaktschiew, Stefan, 2018. "The impact of anti-congestion policies and the role of labor-supply margins," CEPIE Working Papers 04/18, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    8. Satyajit Chatterjee & Burcu Eyigungor, 2017. "A Tractable City Model For Aggregative Analysis," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 58(1), pages 127-155, February.
    9. Tikoudis, Ioannis & Verhoef, Erik T. & van Ommeren, Jos N., 2018. "Second-best urban tolls in a monocentric city with housing market regulations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 342-359.
    10. Xu, Shu-Xian & Liu, Ronghui & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "Pareto-improving policies for an idealized two-zone city served by two congestible modes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 876-891.
    11. Takayama, Yuki & Kuwahara, Masao, 2017. "Bottleneck congestion and residential location of heterogeneous commuters," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 65-79.
    12. Hans Koster, "undated". "The Welfare Effects of Greenbelt Policy: Evidence from England," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-023/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    13. Tatsuhito Kono & Hiroya Kawaguchi, 2017. "Cordon Pricing and Land‐Use Regulation," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 119(2), pages 405-434, April.
    14. Yoshida, Jun & Kono, Tatsuhito, 2020. "Land use policies considering a natural ecosystem," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Hirte, Georg & Min, Hyuk-Ki & Rhee, Hyok-Joo, 2022. "Regulation versus taxation: Efficiency of zoning and tax instruments as anti-congestion policies," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    16. Georg Hirte & Stefan Tscharaktschiew, 2015. "Why not to choose the most convenient labor supply model? The impact of labor supply modeling on policy evaluation," ERSA conference papers ersa15p303, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Clemens de Olde & Stijn Oosterlynck, 2021. "Taking Implementation Seriously in the Evaluation of Urban Growth Management Strategies: “Safeguarding the Future” of the Antwerp City-Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Marz, Waldemar & Goetzke, Frank, 2022. "CAFE in the city — A spatial analysis of fuel economy standards," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    19. Takeda, Yoshihiro & Kono, Tatsuhito & Zhang, Yang, 2019. "Welfare effects of floor area ratio regulation on landowners and residents with different levels of income," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    20. Takayama, Yuki, 2020. "Who gains and who loses from congestion pricing in a monocentric city with a bottleneck?," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:45-:d:86474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.