IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i6p543-d71762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues of Application of Machine Learning Models for Virtual and Real-Life Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Young Min Kim

    (Department of Convergence Engineering for Future City, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, Korea)

  • Ki Uhn Ahn

    (School of Civil, Architectural Engineering and Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, Korea)

  • Cheol Soo Park

    (Department of Convergence Engineering for Future City, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, Korea
    School of Civil, Architectural Engineering and Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, Korea)

Abstract

The current Building Energy Performance Simulation (BEPS) tools are based on first principles. For the correct use of BEPS tools, simulationists should have an in-depth understanding of building physics, numerical methods, control logics of building systems, etc. However, it takes significant time and effort to develop a first principles-based simulation model for existing buildings—mainly due to the laborious process of data gathering, uncertain inputs, model calibration, etc. Rather than resorting to an expert’s effort, a data-driven approach (so-called “inverse” approach) has received growing attention for the simulation of existing buildings. This paper reports a cross-comparison of three popular machine learning models (Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gaussian Process (GP)) for predicting a chiller’s energy consumption in a virtual and a real-life building. The predictions based on the three models are sufficiently accurate compared to the virtual and real measurements. This paper addresses the following issues for the successful development of machine learning models: reproducibility, selection of inputs, training period, outlying data obtained from the building energy management system (BEMS), and validation of the models. From the result of this comparative study, it was found that SVM has a disadvantage in computation time compared to ANN and GP. GP is the most sensitive to a training period among the three models.

Suggested Citation

  • Young Min Kim & Ki Uhn Ahn & Cheol Soo Park, 2016. "Issues of Application of Machine Learning Models for Virtual and Real-Life Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:6:p:543-:d:71762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/6/543/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/6/543/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Bojic, Milorad, 2000. "Artificial neural networks for the prediction of the energy consumption of a passive solar building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 479-491.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carpenter, Joseph & Woodbury, Keith A. & O'Neill, Zheng, 2018. "Using change-point and Gaussian process models to create baseline energy models in industrial facilities: A comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 415-425.
    2. Hyo-Jun Kim & Young-Hum Cho, 2021. "Optimal Control Method of Variable Air Volume Terminal Unit System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Mirian Jiménez-Torres & Catalina Rus-Casas & Lenin Guillermo Lemus-Zúiga & Leocadio Hontoria, 2017. "The Importance of Accurate Solar Data for Designing Solar Photovoltaic Systems—Case Studies in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalogirou, Soteris A., 2001. "Artificial neural networks in renewable energy systems applications: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 373-401, December.
    2. Buratti, Cinzia & Barelli, Linda & Moretti, Elisa, 2012. "Application of artificial neural network to predict thermal transmittance of wooden windows," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 425-432.
    3. Tian, Wei & Song, Jitian & Li, Zhanyong & de Wilde, Pieter, 2014. "Bootstrap techniques for sensitivity analysis and model selection in building thermal performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 320-328.
    4. Movagharnejad, Kamyar & Mehdizadeh, Bahman & Banihashemi, Morteza & Kordkheili, Masoud Sheikhi, 2011. "Forecasting the differences between various commercial oil prices in the Persian Gulf region by neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 3979-3984.
    5. Rodríguez-Hidalgo, M.C. & Rodríguez-Aumente, P.A. & Lecuona, A. & Legrand, M. & Ventas, R., 2012. "Domestic hot water consumption vs. solar thermal energy storage: The optimum size of the storage tank," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 897-906.
    6. Wang, Zhangyuan & Yang, Wansheng & Qiu, Feng & Zhang, Xiangmei & Zhao, Xudong, 2015. "Solar water heating: From theory, application, marketing and research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 68-84.
    7. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    8. Wen, Hao & Sang, Song & Qiu, Chenhui & Du, Xiangrui & Zhu, Xiao & Shi, Qian, 2019. "A new optimization method of wind turbine airfoil performance based on Bessel equation and GABP artificial neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Luyao Wang & Hong Fan & Yankun Wang, 2018. "Sustainability Analysis and Market Demand Estimation in the Retail Industry through a Convolutional Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Kusiak, Andrew & Li, Mingyang, 2010. "Reheat optimization of the variable-air-volume box," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 1997-2005.
    11. Kljajić, Miroslav & Gvozdenac, Dušan & Vukmirović, Srdjan, 2012. "Use of Neural Networks for modeling and predicting boiler's operating performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 304-311.
    12. Keçebaş, Ali & Alkan, Mehmet Ali & Yabanova, İsmail & Yumurtacı, Mehmet, 2013. "Energetic and economic evaluations of geothermal district heating systems by using ANN," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 558-567.
    13. Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Florides, Georgios A. & Pouloupatis, Panayiotis D. & Christodoulides, Paul & Joseph-Stylianou, Josephina, 2015. "Artificial neural networks for the generation of a conductivity map of the ground," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 400-407.
    14. An, Ning & Zhao, Weigang & Wang, Jianzhou & Shang, Duo & Zhao, Erdong, 2013. "Using multi-output feedforward neural network with empirical mode decomposition based signal filtering for electricity demand forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 279-288.
    15. Kapp, Sean & Choi, Jun-Ki & Hong, Taehoon, 2023. "Predicting industrial building energy consumption with statistical and machine-learning models informed by physical system parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    16. Kusiak, Andrew & Tang, Fan & Xu, Guanglin, 2011. "Multi-objective optimization of HVAC system with an evolutionary computation algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2440-2449.
    17. Kara Togun, Necla & Baysec, Sedat, 2010. "Prediction of torque and specific fuel consumption of a gasoline engine by using artificial neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 349-355, January.
    18. Lazrak, Amine & Leconte, Antoine & Chèze, David & Fraisse, Gilles & Papillon, Philippe & Souyri, Bernard, 2015. "Numerical and experimental results of a novel and generic methodology for energy performance evaluation of thermal systems using renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 142-156.
    19. Coskun, C. & Oktay, Z. & Dincer, I., 2011. "Estimation of monthly solar radiation distribution for solar energy system analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1319-1323.
    20. Kalogirou, Soteris A., 2000. "Applications of artificial neural-networks for energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(1-2), pages 17-35, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:6:p:543-:d:71762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.