IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3211-d1374099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interaction Effect of Export Trade, Foreign Direct Investment and Technological Independent Innovation in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xianke Li

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China
    School of Economics and Management, Guangzhou College of Applied Science and Technology, Guangzhou 511370, China)

  • Chongyan Li

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China
    School of Economics and Management, Guangzhou College of Applied Science and Technology, Guangzhou 511370, China)

Abstract

China has made significant progress in the field of clean energy and sustainable development, with its photovoltaic industry technology leading globally. What has been the trajectory of China’s successful technological catch-up over the past two decades? Is China’s experience sustainable? To clarify the interaction logic between export trade (ET), foreign direct investment (FDI), and technological independent innovation (TII) in China, this paper uses panel data from 31 provinces and cities in the Chinese Mainland between 2000 and 2022. A panel vector autoregression (PVAR) model is constructed from a dynamic endogenous perspective to verify the interaction and regional heterogeneity among the three. The results are as follows: (1) The unified analytical framework shows a significant bidirectional “positive feedback effect” between ET and TII. However, FDI inhibits TII to a certain extent. Furthermore, the correlation between ET and FDI is weak. (2) The impact of ET on TII is most pronounced in the western region, while the central region sees the highest contribution rate of FDI to TII. The self-evolution effect of TII is most evident in the eastern region. This study provides suggestions for the government to develop an adaptation policy for local industrial technology conditions and establish a National Sustainable Systems of Innovation (NSSI) with multiple comparative advantages, and serves as a reference for establishing a “Chinese model”.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianke Li & Chongyan Li, 2024. "Interaction Effect of Export Trade, Foreign Direct Investment and Technological Independent Innovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3211-:d:1374099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sims, Christopher A, 1980. "Comparison of Interwar and Postwar Business Cycles: Monetarism Reconsidered," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(2), pages 250-257, May.
    2. Holtz-Eakin, Douglas & Newey, Whitney & Rosen, Harvey S, 1988. "Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(6), pages 1371-1395, November.
    3. Adam B. Jaffe & Karen Palmer, 1997. "Environmental Regulation And Innovation: A Panel Data Study," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 79(4), pages 610-619, November.
    4. Francisco L. Rivera-Batiz & Luis A. Rivera-Batiz, 2018. "Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Francisco L Rivera-Batiz & Luis A Rivera-Batiz (ed.), International Trade, Capital Flows and Economic Development, chapter 1, pages 3-32, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Anthony Creane & Kaz Miyagiwa, 2020. "Export versus FDI: Learning through propinquity," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 16(4), pages 361-379, December.
    6. Cristina Villar & Ramón Javier Mesa & Jose Plà Barber, 2020. "A meta-analysis of export spillovers from FDI: advanced vs emerging markets," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(5), pages 991-1010, January.
    7. Love, Inessa & Zicchino, Lea, 2006. "Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 190-210, May.
    8. Ning, Lutao & Guo, Rui & Chen, Kaihua, 2023. "Does FDI bring knowledge externalities for host country firms to develop complex technologies? The catalytic role of overseas returnee clustering structures," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    9. Yuliani Suseno & Craig Standing, 2018. "The Systems Perspective of National Innovation Ecosystems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 282-307, May.
    10. Cristiano Antonelli & Christophe Feder, 2021. "The Schumpeterian creative response: export and innovation: evidence for OECD countries 1995–2015," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(3), pages 803-821, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ouyang, Yaofu & Li, Peng, 2018. "On the nexus of financial development, economic growth, and energy consumption in China: New perspective from a GMM panel VAR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 238-252.
    2. Ma, Shao-Chao & Fan, Ying, 2020. "A deployment model of EV charging piles and its impact on EV promotion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Bo Niu & Dazhuan Ge & Rui Yan & Yingyi Ma & Dongqi Sun & Mengqiu Lu & Yuqi Lu, 2021. "The Evolution of the Interactive Relationship between Urbanization and Land-Use Transition: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Lips, Johannes, 2018. "Debt and the Oil Industry - Analysis on the Firm and Production Level," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181504, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Wang, Yuanyuan & Chi, Yuanying & Xu, Jin-Hua & Yuan, Yongke, 2022. "Consumers’ attitudes and their effects on electric vehicle sales and charging infrastructure construction: An empirical study in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    6. Elgin, Ceyhun & Kuzubas, Tolga Umut, 2013. "Wage-productivity gap in OECD economies," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 7, pages 1-21.
    7. Maurizio Lisciandra & Carlo Migliardo, 2017. "An Empirical Study of the Impact of Corruption on Environmental Performance: Evidence from Panel Data," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 297-318, October.
    8. Qureshi, Fiza & Khan, Habib Hussain & Rehman, Ijaz Ur & Ghafoor, Abdul & Qureshi, Saba, 2019. "Mutual fund flows and investors’ expectations in BRICS economies: Implications for international diversification," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 130-150.
    9. Long Chen & Nan Wang & Qiyun Li & Wenjun Zhou, 2023. "Environmental regulation, foreign direct investment and China’s economic development under the new normal: restrain or promote?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4195-4216, May.
    10. Boeing, Philipp & Eberle, Jonathan & Howell, Anthony, 2022. "The impact of China's R&D subsidies on R&D investment, technological upgrading and economic growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. O'Toole, Conor M. & Morgenroth, Edgar L.W. & Ha, Thuy T., 2016. "Investment efficiency, state-owned enterprises and privatisation: Evidence from Viet Nam in Transition," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 93-108.
    12. Mozhgan Asna-ashary & Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Mehdi Feizi & Saeed Malek Sadati, 2020. "COVID-19 Outbreak and Air Pollution in Iran: A Panel VAR Analysis," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202016, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    13. Luca Agnello & Ricardo M. Sousa, 2013. "Fiscal Policy And Asset Prices," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(2), pages 154-177, April.
    14. Elgin, Ceyhun & Yucel, Emekcan, 2014. "Determinants of the weight for leisure in preferences," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 8, pages 1-26.
    15. Manthos D. Delis & Iftekhar Hasan & Pantelis Kazakis, 2014. "Bank Regulations and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 18(5), pages 1811-1846.
    16. Dreger, Christian & Reimers, Hans-Eggert, 2014. "On the relationship between public and private investment in the euro area," Discussion Papers 344, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.
    17. Odolinski, Kristofer & Wheat, Phillip, 2016. "Dynamics in rail infrastructure provision: maintenance and renewal costs in Sweden," Working papers in Transport Economics 2016:23, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI), revised 11 Dec 2017.
    18. Luca Agnello & Ricardo M. Sousa, 2011. "Can Fiscal Policy Stimulus Boost Economic Recovery?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 62(6), pages 1045-1066.
    19. Sumon Kumar Bhaumik & Manisha Chakrabarty & Ali M. Kutan & Ekta Selarka, 2021. "How Effective are Stock Market Reforms in Emerging Market Economies? Evidence from a Panel VAR Model of the Indian Stock Market," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(4), pages 795-818, December.
    20. Kumeka, Terver Theophilus & Uzoma-Nwosu, Damian Chidozie & David-Wayas, Maria Onyinye, 2022. "The effects of COVID-19 on the interrelationship among oil prices, stock prices and exchange rates in selected oil exporting economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3211-:d:1374099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.