IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2531-d1359956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bicycle Parking Requirements in City Building Codes and Their Potential to Promote Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • David Kohlrautz

    (Institute of Urban and Transport Planning, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany)

  • Tobias Kuhnimhof

    (Institute of Urban and Transport Planning, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany)

Abstract

Bicycle parking requirements in building codes are an important tool for promoting cycling, as several studies have shown that the provision of secure parking increases cycling rates and contributes to sustainability. However, bicycle parking requirements are not comprehensive across the EU and vary widely within countries and between municipalities, which questions what aspects they should consider. This paper analyzes the literature and guidelines on parking requirements and compares their implementation in ten German and four international cities both qualitatively, examining specific requirements for parking facilities, and quantitatively, examining the number of spaces required. The results show that most guidelines set comparable standards in terms of quality and quantity. However, the quality standards defined in the actual building codes are heterogeneous. While most cities require features such as the ability to lock the bicycle frame, they do not adequately address different user groups and insufficiently consider e-bike charging infrastructure. Most cities meet the guidelines for the required number of bicycle parking spaces, but lack a clear rationale based on local conditions, which can lead to an unsustainable under- or oversupply. In summary, cities do not fully utilize the potential of parking requirements to promote cycling because of incomplete qualitative standards.

Suggested Citation

  • David Kohlrautz & Tobias Kuhnimhof, 2024. "Bicycle Parking Requirements in City Building Codes and Their Potential to Promote Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2531-:d:1359956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shoup, Donald C., 1997. "The High Cost of Free Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4vz087cc, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. David Kohlrautz & Tobias Kuhnimhof, 2023. "E-Bike Charging Infrastructure in the Workplace—Should Employers Provide It?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Shoup, Donald C., 1997. "The High Cost of Free Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt25w617n7, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Alexandros Nikitas & Stefanos Tsigdinos & Christos Karolemeas & Efthymia Kourmpa & Efthimios Bakogiannis, 2021. "Cycling in the Era of COVID-19: Lessons Learnt and Best Practice Policy Recommendations for a More Bike-Centric Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Changzheng Yuan & Yangbo Sun & Jun Lv & Anne C. Lusk, 2017. "Cycle Tracks and Parking Environments in China: Learning from College Students at Peking University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao, Haohan & Xu, Meng & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Pricing strategies for shared parking management with double auction approach: Differential price vs. uniform price," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Lin, Ting (Grace) & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Robinson, Todd P. & Goulias, Konstadinos G. & Church, Richard L. & Olaru, Doina & Tapin, John & Han, Renlong, 2014. "Spatial analysis of access to and accessibility surrounding train stations: a case study of accessibility for the elderly in Perth, Western Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 111-120.
    3. Keumju Lim & Justine Jihyun Kim & Jongsu Lee, 2020. "Forecasting the future scale of vehicle to grid technology for electric vehicles and its economic value as future electric energy source: The case of South Korea," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(8), pages 1350-1366, December.
    4. Tian, Qiong & Yang, Li & Wang, Chenlan & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "Dynamic pricing for reservation-based parking system: A revenue management method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 36-44.
    5. Kristina M. Currans & Gabriella Abou-Zeid & Chris McCahill & Nicole Iroz-Elardo & Kelly J. Clifton & Susan Handy & Irene Pineda, 2023. "Households with constrained off-street parking drive fewer miles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2227-2252, December.
    6. Franco, Sofia & Cutter, W. & Lewis, Skyler, 2020. "The Shadow Cost of Parking Minimums: Evidence from Los Angeles County," Economics Department, Working Paper Series 1014, Economics Department, Pomona College, revised 12 Aug 2020.
    7. Perdomo Calvo, Jorge Andrés, 2014. "An Economics Approach to Fixing the Fare of the Parking Lot Service in Bogotá Using Price Cap Regulation," MPRA Paper 79614, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Rodríguez, Andrés & Cordera, Rubén & Alonso, Borja & dell'Olio, Luigi & Benavente, Juan, 2022. "Microsimulation parking choice and search model to assess dynamic pricing scenarios," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 253-269.
    9. Jorge Andrés Perdomo Calvo & Mariana Rubio, 2012. "Regulación económica para la tarifa de parqueaderos en Bogotá mediante precios máximos," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, December.
    10. Shoup, Donald C., 1999. "The trouble with minimum parking requirements," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 549-574.
    11. Ulrika Gunnarsson-Östling, 2021. "Housing Design and Mobility Convenience—The Case of Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Watters, Paul & O'Mahony, Margaret & Caulfield, Brian, 2006. "Response to cash outs for work place parking and work place parking charges," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 503-510, November.
    13. José Javier Soto Martínez & Luis Gabriel Márquez Díaz & Luis Fernando Macea Mercado, 2018. "Preferencias sobre alternativas de estacionamiento en Cartagena: ¿Cuánto están dispuestos a pagar los conductores?," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 12(2), pages 163-180, December.
    14. Basu, Rounaq & Ferreira, Joseph, 2021. "Sustainable mobility in auto-dominated Metro Boston: Challenges and opportunities post-COVID-19," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 197-210.
    15. Balsas, Carlos J. L., 2003. "Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 35-49, January.
    16. Jessica Berg & Malin Henriksson & Jonas Ihlström, 2019. "Comfort First! Vehicle-Sharing Systems in Urban Residential Areas: The Importance for Everyday Mobility and Reduction of Car Use among Pilot Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Andersson, Matts & Mandell, Svante & Thörn, Helena Braun & Gomér, Ylva, 2016. "The effect of minimum parking requirements on the housing stock," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 206-215.
    18. Shoup, Donald C., 1997. "Evaluating the effects of cashing out employer-paid parking: Eight case studies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 201-216, October.
    19. Gwendolyn Bailey & Thomas LaPoint, 2016. "Comparing Greenhouse Gas Emissions across Texas Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Shoup, Donald C., 2004. "The ideal source of local public revenue," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 753-784, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2531-:d:1359956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.