IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2407-d1356817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Entrepreneurial Leadership, Innovative Behaviour, and Competitive Advantage Relationship in Manufacturing Companies: A Key to Manufactural Development and Sustainable Business

Author

Listed:
  • Kansu Ercantan

    (Business Administration Department, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Near East University, Nicosia 99010, Cyprus)

  • Şerife Z. Eyupoglu

    (Business Administration Department, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Near East University, Nicosia 99010, Cyprus)

  • Özlem Ercantan

    (Business Administration Department, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Near East University, Nicosia 99010, Cyprus)

Abstract

The ability of management to influence employee attitudes and behaviours towards organizational goals is pivotal for an organization’s competitiveness, development, and survival. The study’s objective was to investigate the link between entrepreneurial leadership, competitive advantage, and manufacturing development, mediated by employees’ innovative behaviour, via the lens of resource-based view theory. Convenience sampling was used to collect quantitative data from the 378 manufacturing sector employees through the use of a cross-sectional design. There is a lack of research on the underlying mechanisms by which leaders influence organizational processes, such as innovation stimulation. This study explores the psychological mechanisms influencing entrepreneurial leadership and employee innovative behaviour, revealing that entrepreneurial leadership reduces work uncertainty, encourages innovation, and significantly impacts a firm’s competitive advantage in the market. The findings of the study revealed that entrepreneurial leadership fosters an encouraging and supportive environment in the workplace, which in turn leads to a sustainable competitive advantage. Additionally, the findings showed that innovative behaviour significantly mediates the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and competitive advantage. By expanding the applicability of resource-based view theory, the results of this research also contribute to the comprehension of the interplay between innovative attitudes, manufactural development, competitive advantage, and leadership, specifically in the context of manufacturing sector organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kansu Ercantan & Şerife Z. Eyupoglu & Özlem Ercantan, 2024. "The Entrepreneurial Leadership, Innovative Behaviour, and Competitive Advantage Relationship in Manufacturing Companies: A Key to Manufactural Development and Sustainable Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2407-:d:1356817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2407/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2407/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lulu Zhou & Shuming Zhao & Feng Tian & Xufan Zhang & Stephen Chen, 2018. "Visionary leadership and employee creativity in China," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(1), pages 93-105, April.
    2. Basharat Javed & Atique Arif Khan & Sajid Bashir & Surendra Arjoon, 2017. "Impact of ethical leadership on creativity: the role of psychological empowerment," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 839-851, June.
    3. Bo Carlsson & Pontus Braunerhjelm & Maureen McKelvey & Christer Olofsson & Lars Persson & Håkan Ylinenpää, 2013. "The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 913-930, December.
    4. Gita Surie & Allan Ashley, 2008. "Integrating Pragmatism and Ethics in Entrepreneurial Leadership for Sustainable Value Creation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 235-246, August.
    5. William Wales & Erik Monsen & Alexander McKelvie, 2011. "The Organizational Pervasiveness of Entrepreneurial Orientation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 895-923, September.
    6. Scott L. Newbert, 2008. "Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual‐level empirical investigation of the resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(7), pages 745-768, July.
    7. Maczulskij, Terhi & Viinikainen, Jutta, 2023. "Self-confidence predicts entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial success," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    8. Gupta, Vipin & MacMillan, Ian C. & Surie, Gita, 2004. "Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 241-260, March.
    9. Julian Birkinshaw, 1997. "Entrepreneurship In Multinational Corporations: The Characteristics Of Subsidiary Initiatives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 207-229, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katharina Fellnhofer & Kaisu Puumalainen & Helena Sjögrén, 0. "Entrepreneurial orientation in work groups – effects of individuals and group characteristics," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-37.
    2. Katharina Fellnhofer & Kaisu Puumalainen & Helena Sjögrén, 2017. "Entrepreneurial orientation in work groups – effects of individuals and group characteristics," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 427-463, June.
    3. Andreas Engelen & Christoph Neumann & Christian Schwens, 2015. "“Of Course I Can†: The Effect of CEO Overconfidence on Entrepreneurially Oriented Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1137-1160, September.
    4. Tengku Mohd Azizuddin Tuan Mahmood & Abdullah Al Mamun & Ghazali Bin Ahmad & Mohamed Dahlan Ibrahim, 2019. "Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions and Pre-Start-Up Behaviour among Asnaf Millennials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-26, September.
    5. J. P. Coen Rigtering & M. Ayelen Behrens, 2021. "The Effect of Corporate — Start-Up Collaborations on Corporate Entrepreneurship," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(8), pages 2427-2454, November.
    6. Williams, Christopher & Lee, Soo Hee, 2009. "International management, political arena and dispersed entrepreneurship in the MNC," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 287-299, July.
    7. Sarabi, Almasa & Froese, Fabian J. & Chng, Daniel H.M. & Meyer, Klaus E., 2020. "Entrepreneurial leadership and MNE subsidiary performance: The moderating role of subsidiary context," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    8. Luís Marques & João J. Ferreira & Sascha Kraus & Raj Mahto, 2022. "Organizational Antecedents of Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Quantitative Investigation from Portugal," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(3), pages 483-513, November.
    9. Haim Faridian, Parisa, 2023. "Leading open innovation: The role of strategic entrepreneurial leadership in orchestration of value creation and capture in GitHub open source communities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Ambos, Tina C. & Hughes, Mathew (Mat) & Niemand, Thomas & Kraus, Sascha, 2023. "Subsidiary managers' initiative pursuit: A behavioral agency model," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    11. Juan Yang & Bo Pu & Zhenzhong Guan, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Leadership and Turnover Intention in Startups: Mediating Roles of Employees’ Job Embeddedness, Job Satisfaction and Affective Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Lars Matysiak & Alan M. Rugman & Andreas Bausch, 2018. "Dynamic Capabilities of Multinational Enterprises: The Dominant Logics Behind Sensing, Seizing, and Transforming Matter!," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 225-250, April.
    13. Katalin Takacs Haynes & Michael A. Hitt & Joanna Tochman Campbell, 2015. "The Dark Side of Leadership: Towards a Mid-Range Theory of Hubris and Greed in Entrepreneurial Contexts," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 479-505, June.
    14. Sara S. A. Abdalla & Koichi Nakagawa, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Leadership, Supply Chain Innovation, and Adaptability: A Cross-national Investigation," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Crespo, Cátia Fernandes & Crespo, Nuno Fernandes & Curado, Carla, 2022. "The effects of subsidiary’s leadership and entrepreneurship on international marketing knowledge transfer and new product development," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).
    16. Karpinskaya, E. & Shirokova, G., 2018. "Entrepreneurial Leadership: Approaches to Concept Definition and Main Research Directions," Working Papers 15111, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    17. Hensellek, Simon & Kleine-Stegemann, Lucas & Kollmann, Tobias, 2023. "Entrepreneurial leadership, strategic flexibility, and venture performance: Does founders' span of control matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Prommer, Lisa & Tiberius, Victor & Kraus, Sascha, 2020. "Exploring the future of startup leadership development," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    19. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    20. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2407-:d:1356817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.