IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p727-d1319057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing Models under Three-Echelon Prefabricated Construction Supply Chains with Consumer Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Jiang

    (College of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China)

  • Yichao Hua

    (College of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China)

  • Meng Yuan

    (College of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China)

  • Igor Martek

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • Weiling Jiang

    (College of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China)

Abstract

With the growing ecological crisis and consumer environmental awareness, there is a general recognition of the urgent need for the reform of the energy-intensive construction industry. Prefabricated construction has emerged as an effective approach to achieve energy conservation and environmental sustainability. The prefabricated rate is a critical indicator that comprehensively reflects the level of technology, which affects orders, costs, pricing, and partnerships. Moreover, given the highly decentralized nature of the construction industry, it is imperative to consider building materials’ supply in the Prefabricated Construction Supply Chain (PCSC). Therefore, this paper investigates how the prefabricated rate affects consumer preferences and order allocation while designing a three-echelon PCSC under a single-supplier structure, two-supplier structure, and dual-channel structure. Two different channels, prefabricated component and non-prefabricated component, are distinguished by the prefabricated rate. This research not only provides pricing-oriented decision advice but also offers suggestions for channel selection among participants. The results show that the increase in consumers’ preference for the prefabricated rate raises prices. Moreover, a moderate prefabricated rate is most beneficial. Comparing the three models, the supply chain performance of a two-supplier structure is better than that of a single-supplier structure if the prefabricated rate exceeds a certain threshold, while the dual-channel structure is the worst.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Jiang & Yichao Hua & Meng Yuan & Igor Martek & Weiling Jiang, 2024. "Pricing Models under Three-Echelon Prefabricated Construction Supply Chains with Consumer Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:727-:d:1319057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/727/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/727/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Linghong & Wang, Jingguo & You, Jianxin, 2015. "Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 63-73.
    2. Yue Zhai & Yelin Fu & Gangyan Xu & George Huang, 2019. "Multi-period hedging and coordination in a prefabricated construction supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 1949-1971, April.
    3. Hong, Zhaofu & Guo, Xiaolong, 2019. "Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 155-166.
    4. Lara Jaillon & C. S. Poon, 2008. "Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: a Hong Kong case study," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(9), pages 953-966.
    5. Chiara Criscuolo & Ralf Martin & Henry G. Overman & John Van Reenen, 2019. "Some Causal Effects of an Industrial Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(1), pages 48-85, January.
    6. Zhai, Yue & Zhong, Ray Y. & Huang, George Q., 2018. "Buffer space hedging and coordination in prefabricated construction supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 192-206.
    7. Balderjahn, Ingo, 1988. "Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 51-56, August.
    8. Liu, Zugang (Leo) & Anderson, Trisha D. & Cruz, Jose M., 2012. "Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 602-613.
    9. Yue Zhai & Ray Y. Zhong & Zhi Li & George Huang, 2017. "Production lead-time hedging and coordination in prefabricated construction supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 3984-4002, July.
    10. Yingmiao Qian & Xian-An Yu & Malin Song & Zhiyang Shen, 2023. "Complexity analysis and control of game behavior of subjects in green building materials supply chain considering technology subsidies," Post-Print hal-03974946, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen Jiang & Meng Yuan, 2022. "Coordination of Prefabricated Construction Supply Chain under Cap-and-Trade Policy Considering Consumer Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Pei Dang & Zhanwen Niu & Shang Gao & Lei Hou & Guomin Zhang, 2020. "Critical Factors Influencing the Sustainable Construction Capability in Prefabrication of Chinese Construction Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Li, Jin & Hu, Zening & Shi, Victor & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Manufacturer's encroachment strategy with substitutable green products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Ouyang, Jianjun & Fu, Jie, 2023. "Energy-saving and subsidy policy decisions for double competition manufacturers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Bian, Junsong & Zhao, Xuan, 2020. "Competitive environmental sourcing strategies in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Zhai, Yue & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Shao, Saijun & Xu, Su Xiu & Huang, George Q., 2020. "Spatial-temporal hedging coordination in prefabricated housing production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Yang Liu & Jianjun Dong & Ling Shen, 2020. "A Conceptual Development Framework for Prefabricated Construction Supply Chain Management: An Integrated Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-29, March.
    8. Jin, Minyue & Zhang, Xueqing & Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu, 2021. "Implications of green optimism upon sustainable supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 131-139.
    9. Asgari, Erfan & Hammami, Ramzi & Frein, Yannick & Nouira, Imen, 2021. "The effect of greenness- and price-based competition on a product's environmental performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    10. Han, Xiaoya & Khouja, Moutaz & Liu, Xin, 2023. "A dynamic model considering consumer green awareness and environmental subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Jiguang Wang & Jianhong Chang & Yucai Wu, 2020. "The Optimal Production Decision of Competing Supply Chains When Considering Green Degree: A Game-Theoretic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Mukherjee, Arka & Carvalho, Margarida, 2021. "Dynamic decision making in a mixed market under cooperation: Towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    14. Wang, Moran & Guo, Xiaolong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "Financial hedging in two-stage sustainable commodity supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 803-818.
    15. Bowon Kim & Jeong Eun Sim, 2016. "Supply Chain Coordination and Consumer Awareness for Pollution Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Chen, Wenbo, 2018. "Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharingAuthor-Name: Yang, Huixiao," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 179-191.
    17. Prudence Dato, 2018. "Investment in Energy Efficiency, Adoption of Renewable Energy and Household Behavior: Evidence from OECD Countries," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    18. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Guo, Jian-Xin & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2021. "Implications for enterprise to adopt cleaner technology: From the perspective of energy market and commodity market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Ouardighi, Fouad El & Sim, Jeong Eun & Kim, Bowon, 2016. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 982-996.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:727-:d:1319057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.