IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15816-d1277567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Assessment of Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Agricultural Development Level in China: A County-Level Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Jiang

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Wanshun Zhang

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    China Institute of Development Strategy and Planning, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Feng Zhou

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Hong Peng

    (Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering, School of Water Resources and Hydropower, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Xin Liu

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yue Wang

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Xiao Zhang

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Main Functional Area Planning (MFAP) is a significant initiative in China, aimed at promoting coordinated socio-economic progress while ensuring resource capacity and environmental sustainability. However, there is a lack of quantitative assessments of China’s county-level agricultural development level (ADL) following the implementation of the MFAP. In this study, a coupled “agricultural product-agricultural space-agricultural population” evaluation index system which was based on plan requirements, remote sensing imagery, statistical data, and industry-specific information was proposed for assessing the development level of agricultural after implementing the MFAP, and we utilized the system to evaluate the ADL of 2850 counties across China from 2009 to 2015 at the county level. The results indicate that MFAP has played a positive role in driving agricultural development in China. From 2009 to 2015, the ADL of counties in China showed an upward trend, and the agricultural development within the “Seven regions & Twenty-three belts” reached a high level, with the proportion of the top three districts and counties in the agricultural development zone increasing from 86.78% to 88.72%. The spatial distribution of ADL ratings shows a central > east > northeast > west pattern, with the western regions exhibiting the fastest growth rate. Moreover, targeted policies were provided for pathway optimization and upgrading the level of agricultural development of regions with different levels of development within the seven main agricultural production areas and others.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Jiang & Wanshun Zhang & Feng Zhou & Hong Peng & Xin Liu & Yue Wang & Xiao Zhang, 2023. "Quantitative Assessment of Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Agricultural Development Level in China: A County-Level Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15816-:d:1277567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15816/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15816/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Shan & Jiang, Li & Shen, Geoffrey Q.P., 2019. "Embodied pasture land use change in China 2000-2015: From the perspective of globalization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 476-485.
    2. You, Liangzhi & Wood, Stanley, 2006. "An entropy approach to spatial disaggregation of agricultural production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-3), pages 329-347, October.
    3. Xufeng Cui & Ting Cai & Wei Deng & Rui Zheng & Yuehua Jiang & Hongjie Bao, 2022. "Indicators for Evaluating High-Quality Agricultural Development: Empirical Study from Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1101-1127, December.
    4. Shen, Zhiyang & Baležentis, Tomas & Chen, Xueli & Valdmanis, Vivian, 2018. "Green growth and structural change in Chinese agricultural sector during 1997–2014," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 83-96.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yufeng & Miao, Jiafeng, 2023. "What Determines China’s Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution? An Improved LMDI Decomposition Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(2), May.
    2. Terrance Hurley & Jawoo Koo & Kindie Tesfaye, 2018. "Weather risk: how does it change the yield benefits of nitrogen fertilizer and improved maize varieties in sub‐Saharan Africa?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 711-723, November.
    3. Mengjie Tian & Mingyong Hong & Ji Wang, 2023. "Land resources, market-oriented reform and high-quality agricultural development," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4165-4197, December.
    4. Shuai Qin & Hong Chen & Tuyen Thi Tran & Haokun Wang, 2022. "Analysis of the Spatial Effect of Capital Misallocation on Agricultural Output—Taking the Main Grain Producing Areas in Northeast China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Guan, Shihui & Han, Mengyao & Wu, Xiaofang & Guan, ChengHe & Zhang, Bo, 2019. "Exploring energy-water-land nexus in national supply chains: China 2012," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1225-1234.
    6. Joshua Elliot & Michael Glotter & Neil Best & Ken Boote & Jim Jones & Jerry Hatfield & Cynthia Rozenweig & Leonard A. Smith & Ian Foster, 2013. "Predicting agricultural impacts of large-scale drought: 2012 and the case for better modeling," GRI Working Papers 111, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    7. António Xavier & Rui Fragoso & Maria Belém Costa Freitas & Maria Socorro Rosário, 2019. "An Approach Using Entropy and Supervised Classifications to Disaggregate Agricultural Data at a Local Level," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(4), pages 763-779, December.
    8. Song, Jingyu & Delgado, Michael & Preckel, Paul & Villoria, Nelson, 2016. "Pixel Level Cropland Allocation and Marginal Impacts of Biophysical Factors," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235327, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Valin, Hugo & Havlik, Petr & Mosnier, Aline & Obersteiner, Michael, 2012. "Impacts of Alternative Climate Change Mitigation Policies on Food Consumption under various Diet Scenarios," Conference papers 332253, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Zhuohui Yu & Shiping Mao & Qingning Lin, 2022. "Has China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy Improved Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Kiselev, Sergey & Romashkin, Roman & Nelson, Gerald C. & Mason-D'Croz, Daniel & Palazzo, Amanda, 2013. "Russia's food security and climate change: Looking into the future," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 7, pages 1-66.
    12. Hyman, Glenn & Fujisaka, Sam & Jones, Peter & Wood, Stanley & de Vicente, M. Carmen & Dixon, John, 2008. "Strategic approaches to targeting technology generation: Assessing the coincidence of poverty and drought-prone crop production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 50-61, July.
    13. Guo, Shan & Li, Yilin & Hu, Yunhao & Xue, Fan & Chen, Bin & Chen, Zhan-Ming, 2020. "Embodied energy in service industry in global cities: A study of six Asian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Thomas, Timothy S., 2015. "US maize data reveals adaptation to heat and water stress:," IFPRI discussion papers 1485, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Xiong, Wei & Balkovič, Juraj & van der Velde, Marijn & Zhang, Xuesong & Izaurralde, R. César & Skalský, Rastislav & Lin, Erda & Mueller, Nathan & Obersteiner, Michael, 2014. "A calibration procedure to improve global rice yield simulations with EPIC," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 128-139.
    16. Gruere, Guillaume & Bouet, Antoine & Mevel, Simon, 2007. "Genetically modified food and international trade: The case of India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and the Philippines," IFPRI discussion papers 740, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. You, Liangzhi & Wood, Stanley & Wood-Sichra, Ulrike & Wu, Wenbin, 2014. "Generating global crop distribution maps: From census to grid," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 53-60.
    18. Havlík, Petr & Schneider, Uwe A. & Schmid, Erwin & Böttcher, Hannes & Fritz, Steffen & Skalský, Rastislav & Aoki, Kentaro & Cara, Stéphane De & Kindermann, Georg & Kraxner, Florian & Leduc, Sylvain & , 2011. "Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 5690-5702, October.
    19. Franco-Solís, Alberto & Montanía, Claudia V., 2021. "Dynamics of deforestation worldwide: A structural decomposition analysis of agricultural land use in South America," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Cheng, Mengyao & Wu, Jialu & Li, Chaohui & Jia, Yuanxin & Xia, Xiaohua, 2023. "Tele-connection of global agricultural land network: Incorporating complex network approach with multi-regional input-output analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15816-:d:1277567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.