IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12604-d1221136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Underground Cavern Sign Group Layout Using Eye-Tracking Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Qin Zeng

    (Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
    College of Economics & Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
    College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Yun Chen

    (Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
    College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Xiazhong Zheng

    (Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
    College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Shiyu He

    (College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Donghui Li

    (Building Decoration Supervision Station, Yichang Municipal Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau, Yichang 443000, China)

  • Benwu Nie

    (CHN ENERGY Jinshajiang Branch Co., Ltd., Kunming 650000, China)

Abstract

Efficient sign layouts play a crucial role in guiding driving in underground construction caverns and enhancing transportation safety. Previous studies have primarily focused on evaluating drivers’ gaze behavior in tunnels to optimize individual traffic sign layouts. However, the lack of a theoretical framework for visual perception of visual capture and information conveyed by sign groups hinders the measurement of drivers’ comprehensive visual perception and the layout optimization of sign groups. To address this gap, this study introduces a calculation method for sign group information volume and a visual cognition model, establishing a comprehensive evaluation approach for sign group visual cognition. Eye movement data, collected using eye-tracking technology, were utilized to evaluate the comprehensive visual perception and optimize the layout of sign groups. The findings indicate that a low information volume fails to enhance recognition ability and alleviate the psychological burden. Conversely, excessive information may result in overlooking signs positioned on the left and top. Furthermore, drivers are unable to improve cognitive efficiency and driving safety even with self-regulation when faced with an information volume exceeding 120 bits within a 100 m span. Overall, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method in promoting the long-term safety effect of temporary signage layouts in underground construction areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin Zeng & Yun Chen & Xiazhong Zheng & Shiyu He & Donghui Li & Benwu Nie, 2023. "Optimization of Underground Cavern Sign Group Layout Using Eye-Tracking Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12604-:d:1221136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lianzhen Wang & Han Zhang & Lingyun Shi & Qingling He & Huizhi Xu, 2021. "Optimization Model of Regional Traffic Signs for Inducement at Road Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Lei Han & Zhigang Du & Shoushuo Wang & Ying Chen, 2022. "Analysis of Traffic Signs Information Volume Affecting Driver’s Visual Characteristics and Driving Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. John Liechty & Rik Pieters & Michel Wedel, 2003. "Global and local covert visual attention: Evidence from a bayesian hidden markov model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 519-541, December.
    4. Amin Azimian & Carlos Alberto Catalina Ortega & Juan Maria Espinosa & Miguel Ángel Mariscal & Susana García-Herrero, 2021. "Analysis of Drivers’ Eye Movements on Roundabouts: A Driving Simulator Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Wenhui Zhang & Jing Dai & Yulong Pei & Penghui Li & Ying Yan & Xinqiang Chen, 2016. "Drivers’ Visual Search Patterns during Overtaking Maneuvers on Freeway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Kun Liu & Hongxing Deng, 2021. "The Relationship of the Information Quantity of Urban Roadside Traffic Signs and Drivers’ Visibility Based on Information Transmission," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Ting Shang & Hao Lu & Peng Wu & Yi Wei, 2021. "Eye-Tracking Evaluation of Exit Advance Guide Signs in Highway Tunnels in Familiar and Unfamiliar Drivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Yong Fang & Jiayi Zhou & Hua Hu & Yanxi Hao & Dianliang Xiao & Shaojie Li, 2022. "Combination Layout of Traffic Signs and Markings of Expressway Tunnel Entrance Sections: A Driving Simulator Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhongxiang Feng & Miaomiao Yang & Yingjie Du & Jin Xu & Congjun Huang & Xu Jiang, 2021. "Effects of the Spatial Structure Conditions of Urban Underpass Tunnels’ Longitudinal Section on Drivers’ Physiological and Behavioral Comfort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Qin Zeng & Yun Chen & Xiazhong Zheng & Meng Zhang & Donghui Li & Qilin Hu, 2023. "Exploring the Visual Attention Mechanism of Long-Distance Driving in an Underground Construction Cavern: Eye-Tracking and Simulated Driving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Sam Hui & Eric Bradlow, 2012. "Bayesian multi-resolution spatial analysis with applications to marketing," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 419-452, December.
    4. Krucien, Nicolas & Ryan, Mandy & Hermens, Frouke, 2017. "Visual attention in multi-attributes choices: What can eye-tracking tell us?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 251-267.
    5. Savannah Wei Shi & Michel Wedel & F. G. M. (Rik) Pieters, 2013. "Information Acquisition During Online Decision Making: A Model-Based Exploration Using Eye-Tracking Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1009-1026, May.
    6. Lemmens, Aurélie & Croux, Christophe & Stremersch, Stefan, 2012. "Dynamics in the international market segmentation of new product growth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 81-92.
    7. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski, 2017. "Applying hidden Markov models to visual activity analysis for simple digital control panel operations," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/17/06, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    8. Ricardo Montoya & Oded Netzer & Kamel Jedidi, 2010. "Dynamic Allocation of Pharmaceutical Detailing and Sampling for Long-Term Profitability," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 909-924, 09-10.
    9. Michel Wedel & Rik Pieters & Ralf Lans, 2023. "Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 697-729, June.
    10. Erik Reichle & Jessica Nelson, 2003. "Local vs. global covert visual attention: Are two states necessary? Comment on Liechty et al., 2003," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 543-549, December.
    11. LouAnne Boyd & Vincent Berardi & Deanna Hughes & Franceli Cibrian & Jazette Johnson & Viseth Sean & Eliza DelPizzo-Cheng & Brandon Mackin & Ayra Tusneem & Riya Mody & Sara Jones & Karen Lotich, 2022. "Manipulating image luminance to improve eye gaze and verbal behavior in autistic children," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Eric M. Schwartz & Eric T. Bradlow & Peter S. Fader, 2014. "Model Selection Using Database Characteristics: Developing a Classification Tree for Longitudinal Incidence Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 188-205, March.
    13. Clarence Lee & Elie Ofek & Thomas J. Steenburgh, 2018. "Personal and Social Usage: The Origins of Active Customers and Ways to Keep Them Engaged," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2473-2495, June.
    14. John R. Hauser & Glen L. Urban & Guilherme Liberali & Michael Braun, 2009. "Website Morphing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 202-223, 03-04.
    15. Yanli Ma & Shouming Qi & Yaping Zhang & Guan Lian & Weixin Lu & Ching-Yao Chan, 2020. "Drivers’ Visual Attention Characteristics under Different Cognitive Workloads: An On-Road Driving Behavior Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Yongzheng Yang & Zhigang Du & Fangtong Jiao & Fuquan Pan, 2021. "Analysis of EEG Characteristics of Drivers and Driving Safety in Undersea Tunnel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Oded Netzer & Olivier Toubia & Eric Bradlow & Ely Dahan & Theodoros Evgeniou & Fred Feinberg & Eleanor Feit & Sam Hui & Joseph Johnson & John Liechty & James Orlin & Vithala Rao, 2008. "Beyond conjoint analysis: Advances in preference measurement," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 337-354, December.
    18. Savannah Wei Shi & Hai Che & Lang Jin, 2021. "Strategic Product Displays Across Different Assortment Levels," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 8(3), pages 84-101, September.
    19. V. Kumar & S. Sriram & Anita Luo & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2011. "Assessing the Effect of Marketing Investments in a Business Marketing Context," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 924-940, September.
    20. Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12604-:d:1221136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.