IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11508-d1202219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Photovoltaic Self-Consumption on Water Treatment Energy Costs: The Case of the Region of Valencia

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos García-López

    (University Institute of Water and Environmental Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Borja Montano

    (University Institute of Water and Environmental Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Joaquín Melgarejo

    (University Institute of Water and Environmental Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

Abstract

Energy consumption is one of the principal components of the operative costs incurred by providers of water services, both financial and environmental. Fortunately, in recent years solar panel technology has improved substantially, and photovoltaic self-consumption has become a tool that can reduce the costs of water reuse and other water services. Regions with a scarcity of water resources make a considerable use of non-conventional sources, consuming a significant amount of energy, which has a high financial and environmental cost and compromises the sustainability of the water supply. This research analyses the possibility of replacing part of this energy with self-consumption through photovoltaic panels based on data obtained for the Region of Valencia in order to analyse the impact of energy substitution on energy costs. Performing a Cost–Benefit Analysis, self-consumption projects require an electricity market price of between 0.14 and 0.18 EUR/kWh, so in financial terms it is not a particularly attractive alternative. However, the avoided greenhouse gas emissions have a high value, and including them in the calculations, the price needed to be in feasible amounts of 0.04–0.10 EUR/kWh for a small installation and 0.02–0.08 EUR/kWh for a large one. In other words, photovoltaic self-consumption is still today an alternative with financial difficulties, but the associated environmental benefit justifies public intervention as it is a beneficial energy alternative in a context of high greenhouse gas emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos García-López & Borja Montano & Joaquín Melgarejo, 2023. "The Influence of Photovoltaic Self-Consumption on Water Treatment Energy Costs: The Case of the Region of Valencia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11508-:d:1202219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11508/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11508/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ornella Malandrino & Daniela Sica & Mario Testa & Stefania Supino, 2017. "Policies and Measures for Sustainable Management of Solar Panel End-of-Life in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Rafael M. Almeida & Rafael Schmitt & Steven M. Grodsky & Alexander S. Flecker & Carla P. Gomes & Lu Zhao & Haohui Liu & Nathan Barros & Rafael Kelman & Peter B. McIntyre, 2022. "Floating solar power could help fight climate change — let’s get it right," Nature, Nature, vol. 606(7913), pages 246-249, June.
    3. Harder, Elizabeth & Gibson, Jacqueline MacDonald, 2011. "The costs and benefits of large-scale solar photovoltaic power production in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 789-796.
    4. Damette, Olivier & Delacote, Philippe & Lo, Gaye Del, 2018. "Households energy consumption and transition toward cleaner energy sources," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 751-764.
    5. Weishi Zhang & David I. Stern & Xianbing Liu & Wenjia Cai & Can Wang, 2017. "An analysis of the costs of energy saving and CO2 mitigation in rural households in China," CCEP Working Papers 1704, Centre for Climate & Energy Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    6. Pillai, Unni, 2015. "Drivers of cost reduction in solar photovoltaics," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 286-293.
    7. Reichelstein, Stefan & Yorston, Michael, 2013. "The prospects for cost competitive solar PV power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 117-127.
    8. Rosenow, Jan & Guertler, Pedro & Sorrell, Steven & Eyre, Nick, 2018. "The remaining potential for energy savings in UK households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 542-552.
    9. Moreno, Blanca & García-Álvarez, María Teresa & Ramos, Carmen & Fernández-Vázquez, Esteban, 2014. "A General Maximum Entropy Econometric approach to model industrial electricity prices in Spain: A challenge for the competitiveness," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 815-824.
    10. Bertsch, Valentin & Geldermann, Jutta & Lühn, Tobias, 2017. "What drives the profitability of household PV investments, self-consumption and self-sufficiency?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1-15.
    11. Dusonchet, Luigi & Telaretti, Enrico, 2010. "Economic analysis of different supporting policies for the production of electrical energy by solar photovoltaics in eastern European Union countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4011-4020, August.
    12. Deb, Dipankar & Brahmbhatt, Nisarg L., 2018. "Review of yield increase of solar panels through soiling prevention, and a proposed water-free automated cleaning solution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3306-3313.
    13. Dusonchet, Luigi & Telaretti, Enrico, 2010. "Economic analysis of different supporting policies for the production of electrical energy by solar photovoltaics in western European Union countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3297-3308, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sommerfeldt, Nelson & Madani, Hatef, 2017. "Revisiting the techno-economic analysis process for building-mounted, grid-connected solar photovoltaic systems: Part one – Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1379-1393.
    2. Bobinaite, Viktorija & Tarvydas, Dalius, 2014. "Financing instruments and channels for the increasing production and consumption of renewable energy: Lithuanian case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 259-276.
    3. Kim, Byungil & Kim, Changyoon & Han, SangUk & Bae, JuHyun & Jung, Jaehoon, 2020. "Is it a good time to develop commercial photovoltaic systems on farmland? An American-style option with crop price risk," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Gobong Choi & Eunnyeong Heo & Chul-Yong Lee, 2018. "Dynamic Economic Analysis of Subsidies for New and Renewable Energy in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Jan K. Kazak & Joanna A. Kamińska & Rafał Madej & Marta Bochenkiewicz, 2020. "Where Renewable Energy Sources Funds are Invested? Spatial Analysis of Energy Production Potential and Public Support," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Ieva Pakere & Dace Lauka & Dagnija Blumberga, 2020. "Does the Balance Exist between Cost Efficiency of Different Energy Efficiency Measures? DH Systems Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Dusonchet, L. & Telaretti, E., 2015. "Comparative economic analysis of support policies for solar PV in the most representative EU countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 986-998.
    8. Andreas Welling, 2017. "Green Finance: Recent developments, characteristics and important actors," FEMM Working Papers 170002, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    9. Antonelli, Marco & Desideri, Umberto, 2014. "The doping effect of Italian feed-in tariffs on the PV market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 583-594.
    10. Olivier De Groote & Axel Gautier & Frank Verboven, 2020. "The political economic of financing climate policy : evidence from the solar PV subsidy programs," Working Paper Research 389, National Bank of Belgium.
    11. Jordehi, A. Rezaee, 2016. "Parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic (PV) cells: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 354-371.
    12. Belqasem Aljafari & Siva Rama Krishna Madeti & Priya Ranjan Satpathy & Sudhakar Babu Thanikanti & Bamidele Victor Ayodele, 2022. "Automatic Monitoring System for Online Module-Level Fault Detection in Grid-Tied Photovoltaic Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Hafeznia, Hamed & Aslani, Alireza & Anwar, Sohail & Yousefjamali, Mahdis, 2017. "Analysis of the effectiveness of national renewable energy policies: A case of photovoltaic policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 669-680.
    14. de la Hoz, Jordi & Martín, Helena & Ballart, Jordi & Córcoles, Felipe & Graells, Moisès, 2013. "Evaluating the new control structure for the promotion of grid connected photovoltaic systems in Spain: Performance analysis of the period 2008–2010," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 541-554.
    15. Marcin Bukowski & Janusz Majewski & Agnieszka Sobolewska, 2020. "Macroeconomic Electric Energy Production Efficiency of Photovoltaic Panels in Single-Family Homes in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Jan Prusa & Andrea Klimesova & Karel Janda, 2013. "Consumer Loss in Czech Photovoltaic Power Plants," CAMA Working Papers 2013-50, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    17. Sarasa-Maestro, Carlos J. & Dufo-López, Rodolfo & Bernal-Agustín, José L., 2013. "Photovoltaic remuneration policies in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 317-328.
    18. Karel Janda & Štěpán Krška & Jan Průša, 2014. "Česká fotovoltaická energie: modelový odhad nákladů na její podporu [Czech Photovoltaic Energy: Model Estimation of The Costs of its Support]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(3), pages 323-346.
    19. Telaretti, E. & Dusonchet, L., 2017. "Stationary battery technologies in the U.S.: Development Trends and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 380-392.
    20. Ruyin Long & Wenhua Cui & Qianwen Li, 2017. "The Evolution and Effect Evaluation of Photovoltaic Industry Policy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-40, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11508-:d:1202219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.