IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9454-d1169397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Cause Analysis of Innovation Ecosystem Niche Fitness: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Xuhong Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Haiqing Hu

    (School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Cheng Zhou

    (Faculty of Culture, Tourism, Journalism and Art, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

Abstract

In this study, we explore the evolution and formation mechanism of innovation ecosystem niche fitness from three perspectives: theoretical analysis, model construction, and empirical testing. Based on the niche theory, a theoretical framework for the innovation ecosystem is constructed. Spatiotemporal analysis and qualitative comparison methods are employed to estimate the innovation niche fitness of nine provinces located in the Yellow River Basin, and their spatiotemporal characteristics and differences in terms of formation mechanism differences are then explored. The results show that: (1) temporally, from 2000 to 2017, the innovation niche fitness in the Yellow River Basin experienced minor fluctuations. However, since 2017, there has been a considerable increase. Spatially, the midstream and downstream regions, particularly in the provinces of Shandong, Henan, and Sichuan, have a higher innovation fitness. Conversely, the upstream regions of Qinghai, Ningxia, Gansu, and Inner Mongolia display a lower fitness because of the lack of advantages in innovation elements. (2) The innovation niche fitness is heavily influenced by several factors, including the number of industrial enterprises above designated size, R&D personnel, higher education institutions, scientific research institutions, expenditure for technical renovation, sales revenue of new products, total expenditure on R&D, and the total retail sales of consumer goods. (3) Four mechanisms explain high innovation niche fitness, each of which corresponds to different regions. The formation mechanisms of low innovation niche fitness can be categorized into two paths, which have an asymmetric relationship with the formation mechanisms of high innovation niche fitness. Therefore, provinces and regions should focus on these advantages to enhance the innovation niche fitness. Our research will serve as a theoretical reference to enhance the overall innovation capacity of the Yellow River Basin in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuhong Zhang & Haiqing Hu & Cheng Zhou, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Cause Analysis of Innovation Ecosystem Niche Fitness: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9454-:d:1169397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9454/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9454/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linyan Wang & Haiqing Hu & Xianzhu Wang, 2022. "The Dynamic Evolution of the Structure of an Urban Housing Investment Niche Network and Its Underlying Mechanisms: A Case Study of 35 Large and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Fan, Di & Li, Yi & Chen, Liang, 2017. "Configuring innovative societies: The crossvergent role of cultural and institutional varieties," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 66, pages 43-56.
    3. Elisa Villani & Christian Lechner, 2021. "How to acquire legitimacy and become a player in a regional innovation ecosystem? The case of a young university," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1017-1045, August.
    4. Xueling Guan & Lijiang Chen & Qing Xia & Zhaohui Qin, 2022. "Innovation Efficiency of Chinese Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry from the Perspective of Innovation Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Ma, Dan & Zhu, Qing, 2022. "Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 801-813.
    6. Yan, Xiang & Bai, Jiancheng & Zhang, Yueyan & Hu, Shiliang, 2022. "Can the ecological environment reverse feed renewable energy technology innovation? -- Heterogeneity test from the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1381-1392.
    7. Xie, Xuemei & Liu, Xiaojie & Blanco, Cristina, 2023. "Evaluating and forecasting the niche fitness of regional innovation ecosystems: A comparative evaluation of different optimized grey models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Yung-Shuan Chen & Han-Sheng Lei & Wei-Che Hsu, 2019. "A Study on the Sustainable Development Strategy of Firms: Niche and Social Network Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Joern Block & Roy Thurik & Haibo Zhou, 2013. "What turns knowledge into innovative products? The role of entrepreneurship and knowledge spillovers," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 693-718, September.
    10. Chen, Ping-Chuan & Hung, Shiu-Wan, 2016. "An actor-network perspective on evaluating the R&D linking efficiency of innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 303-312.
    11. Fukuda, Kayano, 2020. "Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    12. Yanxia Wu & Shuaishuai Yang & Fangnan Liu & Yuxuan Cao & Mingyue Jiang, 2023. "The Security and Driving Factors of the Innovative Ecosystem: Evidence from the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Aleksandra Kuzior & Iryna Pidorycheva & Viacheslav Liashenko & Hanna Shevtsova & Nataliia Shvets, 2022. "Assessment of National Innovation Ecosystems of the EU Countries and Ukraine in the Interests of Their Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Xuemei & Liu, Xiaojie & Blanco, Cristina, 2023. "Evaluating and forecasting the niche fitness of regional innovation ecosystems: A comparative evaluation of different optimized grey models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Prokop, Viktor & Hajek, Petr & Stejskal, Jan, 2021. "Configuration Paths to Efficient National Innovation Ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Roblek Vasja & Meško Maja & Podbregar Iztok, 2021. "Mapping of the Emergence of Society 5.0: A Bibliometric Analysis," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 54(4), pages 293-305, December.
    4. Lingzhang Kong & Jinye Li, 2022. "Digital Economy Development and Green Economic Efficiency: Evidence from Province-Level Empirical Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    7. Pigford, Ashlee-Ann E. & Hickey, Gordon M. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2018. "Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 116-121.
    8. Kun Wang & Bing Chen & Yuhong Li, 2024. "Technological, process or managerial innovation? How does digital transformation affect green innovation in industrial enterprises?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-32, February.
    9. Nan Li & Beibei Shi & Rong Kang, 2023. "Analysis of the Coupling Effect and Space-Time Difference between China’s Digital Economy Development and Carbon Emissions Reduction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Shuying Wang & Yifei Gao & Hongchang Zhou, 2022. "Research on Green Total Factor Productivity Enhancement Path from the Configurational Perspective—Based on the TOE Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Joern H. Block & Christian O. Fisch & Mirjam van Praag, 2017. "The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 61-95, January.
    12. Sainan Cheng & Guohua Qu, 2023. "Research on the Effect of Digital Economy on Carbon Emissions under the Background of “Double Carbon”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Silveli Cristo-Andrade & João J. Ferreira, 2020. "Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship: what researches and approaches?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 263-286, March.
    14. Masatoshi Kato & Koichiro Onishi & Yuji Honjo, 2022. "Does patenting always help new firm survival? Understanding heterogeneity among exit routes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 449-475, August.
    15. Junjun Tang & Xing Zhao, 2023. "Does the new digital infrastructure improve total factor productivity?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(4), pages 895-916, October.
    16. Mukherjee, Abheek Anjan & Raj, Alok & Aggarwal, Shikha, 2023. "Identification of barriers and their mitigation strategies for industry 5.0 implementation in emerging economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    17. Yanzhang Gu & Longying Hu & Hongjin Zhang & Chenxuan Hou, 2021. "Innovation Ecosystem Research: Emerging Trends and Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Ibrahim Yitmen & Amjad Almusaed & Sepehr Alizadehsalehi, 2023. "Investigating the Causal Relationships among Enablers of the Construction 5.0 Paradigm: Integration of Operator 5.0 and Society 5.0 with Human-Centricity, Sustainability, and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.
    19. Maurseth, Per Botolf & Svensson, Roger, 2020. "The Importance of Tacit Knowledge: Dynamic Inventor Activity in the Commercialization Phase," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    20. Wei Yang & Qiuxia Chen & Qiuqi Guo & Xiaoting Huang, 2022. "Towards Sustainable Development: How Digitalization, Technological Innovation, and Green Economic Development Interact with Each Other," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9454-:d:1169397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.