IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p550-d1018220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Characteristics of YouTubers and Their Influence on Viewers’ Purchase Intention: A Viewers’ Pseudo-Social Interaction Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Bo-Chiuan Su

    (School of Business, Putian University, Putian 351100, China)

  • Li-Wei Wu

    (Department of International Business, Tunghai University, Taichung 407224, Taiwan)

  • Ji-Ping Wu

    (Department of International Business, Tunghai University, Taichung 407224, Taiwan)

Abstract

As the video content online becomes more and more diverse and rich, YouTube has become the most commonly used video platform by the public. When choosing a product brand, viewers give priority to products recommended by their favorite YouTubers. To our best knowledge, no studies in the research literature have explored the relationships between the degree of YouTubers’ self-disclosure, similarity of viewers and YouTubers, YouTubers’ attractiveness, and viewers’ pseudo-social interaction with YouTubers and how these affect viewers’ stickiness to YouTubers, viewers’ brand attitudes toward products, and viewers’ perceptions and purchase intentions of YouTuber-recommended brands and products. Viewers’ stickiness to YouTubers, viewers’ brand attitudes toward products, and viewers’ pseudo-social interactions with YouTubers are mediating variables. A total of 435 valid questionnaires were collected. The results show that the degree of YouTubers’ self-disclosure, similarity of viewers and YouTubers, and YouTubers’ attractiveness have a significantly positive impact on viewers’ pseudo-social interaction, and viewers’ pseudo-social interaction will also have a significantly positive impact on viewers’ brand attitude and stickiness to YouTubers. Moreover, viewers’ brand attitude has a significantly positive impact on viewers’ purchase intention. The results also show that the degree of self-disclosure, similarity, and attractiveness indirectly affect brand attitudes through pseudo-social interaction as an intermediary, and the pseudo-social interaction has an indirect effect on purchase intention through brand attitudes. Finally, based on the findings, this paper focuses on the YouTube market and proposes strategies that YouTubers can improve to increase viewers’ stickiness, brand attitudes, and purchase intentions for brands and products recommended by YouTubers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo-Chiuan Su & Li-Wei Wu & Ji-Ping Wu, 2022. "Exploring the Characteristics of YouTubers and Their Influence on Viewers’ Purchase Intention: A Viewers’ Pseudo-Social Interaction Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:550-:d:1018220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/550/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/550/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephens, Debra Lynn & Hill, Ronald Paul & Bergman, Karyn, 1996. "Enhancing the consumer-product relationship: Lessons from the QVC home shopping channel," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 193-200, November.
    2. Bagozzi, Richard P. & Yi, Youjae & Nassen, Kent D., 1998. "Representation of measurement error in marketing variables: Review of approaches and extension to three-facet designs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1-2), pages 393-421, November.
    3. Labrecque, Lauren I., 2014. "Fostering Consumer–Brand Relationships in Social Media Environments: The Role of Parasocial Interaction," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 134-148.
    4. Lee, Jung Eun & Watkins, Brandi, 2016. "YouTube vloggers' influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5753-5760.
    5. Bhatnagar, Amit & Ghose, Sanjoy, 2004. "Segmenting consumers based on the benefits and risks of Internet shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1352-1360, December.
    6. Hashed Mabkhot & Normalisa Md Isa & Ammar Mabkhot, 2022. "The Influence of the Credibility of Social Media Influencers SMIs on the Consumers’ Purchase Intentions: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Johnson, Devon & Grayson, Kent, 2005. "Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 500-507, April.
    8. Kevin Lane Keller & Donald R. Lehmann, 2006. "Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 740-759, 11-12.
    9. Zott, Christoph & Amit, Raphael & Donlevy, Jon, 2000. "Strategies for value creation in e-commerce:: best practice in Europe," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 463-475, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akawut Jansom & Siwarit Pongsakornrungsilp, 2021. "How Instagram Influencers Affect the Value Perception of Thai Millennial Followers and Purchasing Intention of Luxury Fashion for Sustainable Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Edwards, Chase J. & Bendickson, Joshua S. & Baker, Brent L. & Solomon, Shelby J., 2020. "Entrepreneurship within the history of marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 259-267.
    3. Zhenwu You & Meng Wang & Yangjin Shamu, 2023. "The impact of network social presence on live streaming viewers’ social support willingness: a moderated mediation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Raza, Ali & Ishaq, Muhammad Ishtiaq & Khan, Ayesha & Ahmad, Rehan & Haj Salem, Narjes, 2023. "How fashion cewebrity influences customer engagement behavior in emerging economy? Social network influence as moderator," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Yong Wang & Shamim Chowdhury Ahmed & Shejun Deng & Haizhong Wang, 2019. "Success of Social Media Marketing Efforts in Retaining Sustainable Online Consumers: An Empirical Analysis on the Online Fashion Retail Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Weismueller, Jason & Harrigan, Paul & Wang, Shasha & Soutar, Geoffrey N., 2020. "Influencer endorsements: How advertising disclosure and source credibility affect consumer purchase intention on social media," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 160-170.
    7. Mukta Garg & Apurva Bakshi, 2024. "Exploring the impact of beauty vloggers’ credible attributes, parasocial interaction, and trust on consumer purchase intention in influencer marketing," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Bu, Yi & Parkinson, Joy & Thaichon, Park, 2022. "Influencer marketing: Homophily, customer value co-creation behaviour and purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Chuah, Stephanie Hui-Wen, 2021. "“Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 146-157.
    10. Hemant C. Sashittal & Avan R. Jassawalla, 2021. "Brands as personal narratives: learning from user–YouTube–brand interactions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(6), pages 657-670, November.
    11. Jin, S. Venus & Ryu, Ehri, 2020. "“I'll buy what she's #wearing†: The roles of envy toward and parasocial interaction with influencers in Instagram celebrity-based brand endorsement and social commerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    12. Kim, Juran & Kang, Seungmook & Lee, Ki Hoon, 2020. "How social capital impacts the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 596-603.
    13. Cheung, Man Lai & Leung, Wilson K.S. & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Koay, Kian Yeik, 2022. "“I follow what you post!†: The role of social media influencers’ content characteristics in consumers' online brand-related activities (COBRAs)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    14. Sokolova, Karina & Kefi, Hajer, 2020. "Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    15. Molina-Castillo, Francisco-Jose & Lopez-Nicolas, Carolina & Soto-Acosta, Pedro, 2012. "Interaction effects of media and message on perceived complexity, risk and trust of innovative products," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 577-587.
    16. Longinos Marin & Salvador Ruiz, 2007. "“I Need You Too!â€\x9D Corporate Identity Attractiveness for Consumers and The Role of Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 245-260, March.
    17. Yuan, Chun Lin & Moon, Hakil & Kim, Kyung Hoon & Wang, Shuman, 2021. "The influence of parasocial relationship in fashion web on customer equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 610-617.
    18. Manisha Mathur, 2020. "Improving the value of the retailer brand through social media equity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(5), pages 508-530, September.
    19. Masuda, Hisashi & Han, Spring H. & Lee, Jungwoo, 2022. "Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Xiang, Li & Zheng, Xiabing & Lee, Matthew K.O. & Zhao, Dingtao, 2016. "Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on social commerce platform: The role of parasocial interaction," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 333-347.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:550-:d:1018220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.