IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1076-d727362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study on the Difference in Meteorological Monitoring between Constructed Green Land and Natural Sandy Land

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Huo

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    National Observation and Research Station of Desert Meteorology, Taklimakan Desert of Xinjiang, Urumqi 830002, China
    Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education (KLME), Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Fan Yang

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Meteorology and Sandstorm, Urumqi 830002, China
    Key Laboratory of Tree-Ring Physical and Chemical Research, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Xiefei Zhi

    (Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education (KLME), Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Ali Mamtimin

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    National Observation and Research Station of Desert Meteorology, Taklimakan Desert of Xinjiang, Urumqi 830002, China
    Taklimakan Desert Meteorology Field Experiment Station of China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Qing He

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Honglin Pan

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Meteorology and Sandstorm, Urumqi 830002, China
    Key Laboratory of Tree-Ring Physical and Chemical Research, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Cong Wen

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    National Observation and Research Station of Desert Meteorology, Taklimakan Desert of Xinjiang, Urumqi 830002, China
    Taklimakan Desert Meteorology Field Experiment Station of China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Yu Wang

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Meteorology and Sandstorm, Urumqi 830002, China
    Key Laboratory of Tree-Ring Physical and Chemical Research, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Ye Wu

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    National Observation and Research Station of Desert Meteorology, Taklimakan Desert of Xinjiang, Urumqi 830002, China
    Taklimakan Desert Meteorology Field Experiment Station of China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Xinghua Yang

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Meteorology and Sandstorm, Urumqi 830002, China
    Key Laboratory of Tree-Ring Physical and Chemical Research, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Chenglong Zhou

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    National Observation and Research Station of Desert Meteorology, Taklimakan Desert of Xinjiang, Urumqi 830002, China
    Taklimakan Desert Meteorology Field Experiment Station of China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Meiqi Song

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Meteorology and Sandstorm, Urumqi 830002, China
    Key Laboratory of Tree-Ring Physical and Chemical Research, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Lu Meng

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    National Observation and Research Station of Desert Meteorology, Taklimakan Desert of Xinjiang, Urumqi 830002, China
    Taklimakan Desert Meteorology Field Experiment Station of China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Minzhong Wang

    (Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Meteorology and Sandstorm, Urumqi 830002, China
    Key Laboratory of Tree-Ring Physical and Chemical Research, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China)

Abstract

The Taklimakan Desert is a typical arid area. Due to the needs of production and life, a total of 2 km 2 of constructed green land (hereinafter referred to as CGL) has been formed in the sand dune, resulting in the uniform underlying surface of the desert having been changed, which has led to the change in the near-surface energy distribution pattern and the formation of a local climate of the CGL that is obviously different from that of the desert climate. Therefore, it is necessary to study the varied interval of the threshold of meteorological factors and the regional climate characteristics of the CGL under the background of desert. The main results are as follows. Firstly, from sunrise to noon, the increasing rate of temperature in natural sandy land (hereafter, NSL) was higher than that in CGL, and the opposite results occurred between noon and sunset. The peak temperature of CGL was 2 h later than that of NSL. At night, the temperature at the boundary of the CGL was generally higher than that of the NSL and the central area of the CGL. In addition, the results show that under the combined influence of underlying conditions, local circulation and small terrain, the CGL (middle) daily range of temperature > NSL (west) > CGL (east) > CGL (west). The positive temperature change period of CGL was significantly shorter than that of NSL in all seasons. However, temperature inversion occurred at night in all seasons. The intensity of the temperature inversion was strongest in winter, with a maximum temperature difference of 12.8 °C, followed by autumn, spring, and summer, with a maximum difference of 6.4 °C. Secondly, the wind speed in the daytime was higher than that at night, and the wind speed in NSL was higher than that in CGL. In summer, if the average wind speed of the NSL was quantified as 1.0 m/s, the wind speed lapse rate reached 30% at the boundary of the CGL. Similarly, in the central area of CGL, the wind speed lapse rate reached 71%.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Huo & Fan Yang & Xiefei Zhi & Ali Mamtimin & Qing He & Honglin Pan & Cong Wen & Yu Wang & Ye Wu & Xinghua Yang & Chenglong Zhou & Meiqi Song & Lu Meng & Minzhong Wang, 2022. "A Comparative Study on the Difference in Meteorological Monitoring between Constructed Green Land and Natural Sandy Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1076-:d:727362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. Betts, 2000. "Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6809), pages 187-190, November.
    2. Stanislav E. Shmelev & Vitaliy Salnikov & Galina Turulina & Svetlana Polyakova & Tamara Tazhibayeva & Tobias Schnitzler & Irina A. Shmeleva, 2021. "Climate Change and Food Security: The Impact of Some Key Variables on Wheat Yield in Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Fang Zhao & Xincan Lan & Wuyang Li & Wenbo Zhu & Tianqi Li, 2021. "Influence of Land Use Change on the Surface Albedo and Climate Change in the Qinling-Daba Mountains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhan Chen & Yihao Wang & Ruisi Chen & Xiuya Ni & Jixin Cao, 2022. "Effects of Forest Type on Nutrient Fluxes in Throughfall, Stemflow, and Litter Leachate within Acid-Polluted Locations in Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, February.
    2. H. Damon Matthews & Kirsten Zickfeld & Alexander Koch & Amy Luers, 2023. "Accounting for the climate benefit of temporary carbon storage in nature," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Anatoly Shvidenko & Mike Apps, 2006. "The International Boreal Forest Research Association: Understanding Boreal Forests and Forestry in a Changing World," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 5-32, January.
    4. Jiale Tang & Xincan Lan & Yuanyuan Lian & Fang Zhao & Tianqi Li, 2022. "Estimation of Urban–Rural Land Surface Temperature Difference at Different Elevations in the Qinling–Daba Mountains Using MODIS and the Random Forest Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Robert Hamwey, 2007. "Active Amplification of the Terrestrial Albedo to Mitigate Climate Change: An Exploratory Study," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 419-439, May.
    6. Jean-Baptiste, Philippe & Ducroux, Rene, 2003. "Energy policy and climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 155-166, January.
    7. Brazhnik, Ksenia & Shugart, H.H., 2016. "SIBBORK: A new spatially-explicit gap model for boreal forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 182-196.
    8. Raphael Portmann & Urs Beyerle & Edouard Davin & Erich M. Fischer & Steven Hertog & Sebastian Schemm, 2022. "Global forestation and deforestation affect remote climate via adjusted atmosphere and ocean circulation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. He, Hongxing & Jansson, Per-Erik & Svensson, Magnus & Meyer, Astrid & Klemedtsson, Leif & Kasimir, Åsa, 2016. "Factors controlling Nitrous Oxide emission from a spruce forest ecosystem on drained organic soil, derived using the CoupModel," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 321(C), pages 46-63.
    10. Annie Levasseur & Pascal Lesage & Manuele Margni & Miguel Brandão & Réjean Samson, 2012. "Assessing temporary carbon sequestration and storage projects through land use, land-use change and forestry: comparison of dynamic life cycle assessment with ton-year approaches," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 759-776, December.
    11. Rørstad, Per Kristian, 2022. "Payment for CO2 sequestration affects the Faustmann rotation period in Norway more than albedo payment does," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. Binkley, Clark S. & Brand, David & Harkin, Zoe & Bull, Gary & Ravindranath, N. H. & Obersteiner, Michael & Nilsson, Sten & Yamagata, Yoshiki & Krott, Max, 2002. "Carbon sink by the forest sector--options and needs for implementation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 65-77, May.
    13. Gustavsson, Leif & Haus, Sylvia & Lundblad, Mattias & Lundström, Anders & Ortiz, Carina A. & Sathre, Roger & Truong, Nguyen Le & Wikberg, Per-Erik, 2017. "Climate change effects of forestry and substitution of carbon-intensive materials and fossil fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 612-624.
    14. Jingeng Huo & Zhenqin Shi & Wenbo Zhu & Hua Xue & Xin Chen, 2022. "A Multi-Scenario Simulation and Optimization of Land Use with a Markov–FLUS Coupling Model: A Case Study in Xiong’an New Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Sohngen, Brent & Favero, Alice & Jin, Yufang & Huang, Yuhan, 2018. "Global cost estimates of forest climate mitigation with albedo: A new policy approach," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274307, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Yitao Li & Zhao-Liang Li & Hua Wu & Chenghu Zhou & Xiangyang Liu & Pei Leng & Peng Yang & Wenbin Wu & Ronglin Tang & Guo-Fei Shang & Lingling Ma, 2023. "Biophysical impacts of earth greening can substantially mitigate regional land surface temperature warming," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Jussi Lintunen & Aapo Rautiainen & Jussi Uusivuori, 2022. "Which Is more Important, Carbon or Albedo? Optimizing Harvest Rotations for Timber and Climate Benefits in a Changing Climate," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 134-160, January.
    18. Enjun Ma & Xiangzheng Deng & Qian Zhang & Anping Liu, 2014. "Spatial Variation of Surface Energy Fluxes Due to Land Use Changes across China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, April.
    19. Jean-Sébastien Landry & Navin Ramankutty, 2015. "Carbon Cycling, Climate Regulation, and Disturbances in Canadian Forests: Scientific Principles for Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-36, January.
    20. David Lutz & Richard Howarth, 2014. "Valuing albedo as an ecosystem service: implications for forest management," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 53-63, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1076-:d:727362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.