IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16879-d1005134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Decision Framework of Online Multi-Attribute Reverse Auctions for Green Supplier Selection under Mixed Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Shilei Wang

    (Bussiness School, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou 454000, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center of Henan Province for Aviation Economic Development, Zhengzhou 454000, China)

  • Ying Ji

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • M. I. M. Wahab

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

  • Dan Xu

    (Bussiness School, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou 454000, China)

  • Changbao Zhou

    (Bussiness School, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou 454000, China)

Abstract

In order to realize the “dual carbon” goal proposed for the world and to seek the low-carbon and sustainable development of the economy and society, the green supply chain management problem faced by Chinese enterprises and governments is particularly important. At the same time, how to quickly and efficiently select the suitable green supplier is the most basic and critical link in green supply chain management, as well as an important issue that Chinese government and enterprises must face in the process of green material procurement. In addition, there are various uncertainties emerging in the current market environment that hinder the green suppliers and the buyer to make the efficient decisions. Therefore, in order to find a more suitable and efficient method for green supplier selection, from the standpoint of the buyer, a new decision framework of online multi-sourcing, multi-attribute reverse auction (OMSMARA), which effectively improves the procurement efficiency and reduces procurement costs and risks, is proposed under the mixed uncertainty. Specifically, the main innovation work includes three aspects: Firstly, the trapezoidal fuzzy numbers are applied to describe the uncertain bidding attribute values by the green suppliers. Secondly, the hesitant fuzzy sets theory is introduced to characterize the buyer’s satisfaction degrees of the bidding evaluation attribute information, and the attribute weights are determined by using the hesitant fuzzy maximizing deviation method. Thirdly, a fuzzy multi-objective mixed integer programming model is proposed to solve the green supplier selection and quantity allocation question in OMSMARA. A numerical example is given to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed decision framework, and the sensitivity analysis and comparison analysis further show the robustness and reliability of the proposed solution method.

Suggested Citation

  • Shilei Wang & Ying Ji & M. I. M. Wahab & Dan Xu & Changbao Zhou, 2022. "A New Decision Framework of Online Multi-Attribute Reverse Auctions for Green Supplier Selection under Mixed Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16879-:d:1005134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16879/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16879/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yeon-Koo Che, 1993. "Design Competition through Multidimensional Auctions," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 24(4), pages 668-680, Winter.
    2. Pham, Long & Teich, Jeffrey & Wallenius, Hannele & Wallenius, Jyrki, 2015. "Multi-attribute online reverse auctions: Recent research trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 1-9.
    3. Edieal J. Pinker & Abraham Seidmann & Yaniv Vakrat, 2003. "Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1457-1484, November.
    4. Xu, Jiayan & Feng, Yinbo & He, Wen, 2017. "Procurement auctions with ex post cooperation between capacity constrained bidders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1164-1174.
    5. Chuang Li & Qingqing Liu & Qing Li & Hailing Wang, 2022. "Does Innovative Industrial Agglomeration Promote Environmentally-Friendly Development? Evidence from Chinese Prefecture-Level Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Teich, Jeffrey E. & Wallenius, Hannele & Wallenius, Jyrki & Zaitsev, Alexander, 2006. "A multi-attribute e-auction mechanism for procurement: Theoretical foundations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 90-100, November.
    7. Labiba Noshin Asha & Arup Dey & Nita Yodo & Lucy G. Aragon, 2022. "Optimization Approaches for Multiple Conflicting Objectives in Sustainable Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Hanane Assellaou & Brahim Ouhbi & Bouchra Frikh, 2018. "Multi-Objective Programming for Supplier Selection and Order Allocation Under Disruption Risk and Demand, Quality, and Delay Time Uncertainties," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 5(2), pages 30-56, April.
    9. Qian, Xiaohu & Fang, Shu-Cherng & Huang, Min & Wang, Xingwei, 2019. "Winner determination of loss-averse buyers with incomplete information in multiattribute reverse auctions for clean energy device procurement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 276-292.
    10. Liu, Shuren & Liu, Changgeng & Hu, Qiying, 2013. "Optimal procurement strategies by reverse auctions with stochastic demand," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 430-435.
    11. Jain, Vipul & Panchal, Gajanan B. & Kumar, Sameer, 2014. "Universal supplier selection via multi-dimensional auction mechanisms for two-way competition in oligopoly market of supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 127-137.
    12. Cheng, Chi-Bin, 2011. "Reverse auction with buyer-supplier negotiation using bi-level distributed programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 601-611, June.
    13. Bichler, Martin & Kalagnanam, Jayant, 2005. "Configurable offers and winner determination in multi-attribute auctions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(2), pages 380-394, January.
    14. Huang, Min & Qian, Xiaohu & Fang, Shu-Cherng & Wang, Xingwei, 2016. "Winner determination for risk aversion buyers in multi-attribute reverse auction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 184-200.
    15. Qizhong Deng & Yansi Qin & Najid Ahmad, 2022. "Relationship between Environmental Pollution, Environmental Regulation and Resident Health in the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River, China: Spatial Effect and Regulating Effec," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Shaojian Qu & Yuting Xu & Ying Ji & Can Feng & Jinpeng Wei & Shan Jiang, 2022. "Data-Driven Robust Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluating the Carbon Emissions Efficiency of Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gang Ma & Zhengming Zhou & Shilei Wang & Ke Zhou & Junjun Zheng & Chujian Wang, 2023. "Combinatorial Auction of Used Cars Considering Pro-Environment Attribute: A Social Welfare Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Juliang & Xiang, Jie & Cheng, T.C. Edwin & Hua, Guowei & Chen, Cheng, 2019. "An optimal efficient multi-attribute auction for transportation procurement with carriers having multi-unit supplies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 249-260.
    2. Pham, Long & Teich, Jeffrey & Wallenius, Hannele & Wallenius, Jyrki, 2015. "Multi-attribute online reverse auctions: Recent research trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 1-9.
    3. Jifeng Cao & Cheng Ma, 2022. "Procurement Strategies and Auction Mechanism for Heterogeneous Service Providers in a Service Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-36, July.
    4. Xiaohu Qian & Min Huang & Qingyu Zhang & Mingqiang Yin & Xingwei Wang, 2018. "Mechanism design of incentive-based reverse auctions with loss-averse 3PLs under incomplete attributes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Gülşah Karakaya & Murat Köksalan, 2016. "An interactive approach for Bi-attribute multi-item auctions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 97-119, October.
    6. Gregory E. Kersten, 2014. "Multiattribute Procurement Auctions: Efficiency and Social Welfare in Theory and Practice," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 215-232, December.
    7. Yu, Hao & Huang, Min & Chao, Xiuli & Yue, Xiaohang, 2022. "Truthful multi-attribute multi-unit double auctions for B2B e-commerce logistics service transactions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. Lorentziadis, Panos L., 2020. "Competitive bidding in asymmetric multidimensional public procurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 211-220.
    9. Cheng, Chi-Bin, 2011. "Reverse auction with buyer-supplier negotiation using bi-level distributed programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 601-611, June.
    10. Gajanan Panchal & Vipul Jain & Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Matthias Gurtner, 2017. "Equilibrium analysis in multi-echelon supply chain with multi-dimensional utilities of inertial players," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 417-436, August.
    11. Zhang, Meng & Kong, Zhaojun, 2022. "A multi-attribute double auction and bargaining model for emergency material procurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    12. Ching-Hua Chen-Ritzo & Terry P. Harrison & Anthony M. Kwasnica & Douglas J. Thomas, 2005. "Better, Faster, Cheaper: An Experimental Analysis of a Multiattribute Reverse Auction Mechanism with Restricted Information Feedback," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(12), pages 1753-1762, December.
    13. Gérard P. Cachon & Fuqiang Zhang, 2006. "Procuring Fast Delivery: Sole Sourcing with Information Asymmetry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 881-896, June.
    14. Jens Leth Hougaard & Kurt Nielsen & Athanasios Papakonstantinou, 2013. "A Multi-attribute Yardstick Auction without Prior Scoring," MSAP Working Paper Series 02_2013, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics, revised Mar 2014.
    15. Xiaohu Qian & Shu-Cherng Fang & Min Huang & Qi An & Xingwei Wang, 2018. "Reverse auctions with regret-anticipated bidders," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 293-313, September.
    16. Dimitris Kostamis & Damian R. Beil & Izak Duenyas, 2009. "Total-Cost Procurement Auctions: Impact of Suppliers' Cost Adjustments on Auction Format Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(12), pages 1985-1999, December.
    17. Benjamin Blau & Clemens Dinther & Tobias Conte & Yongchun Xu & Christof Weinhardt, 2009. "How to Coordinate Value Generation in Service Networks," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(5), pages 343-356, October.
    18. Wang, Hong, 2020. "Quality manipulation and limit corruption in competitive procurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1124-1135.
    19. Guang-Xin Gao, 2018. "Sustainable Winner Determination for Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects in Multi-Attribute Reverse Auctions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Müller, R.J. & Perea ý Monsuwé, A. & Wolf, S., 2007. "Combinatorial scoring auctions," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16879-:d:1005134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.