IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15505-d980230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual Framework for Evaluating E-Commerce Deliveries Using Agent-Based Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Alves

    (Institute of Science, Technology and Innovation, (ICTIN), Federal University of Lavras, São Sebastião do Paraíso 37950-000, Brazil)

  • Renato da Silva Lima

    (Industrial Engineering and Management Institute, Federal University of Itajubá, Itajubá 37500-903, Brazil)

  • Leise Kelli De Oliveira

    (Department of Transport Engineering and Geotechnics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil)

  • Alexandre Ferreira de Pinho

    (Industrial Engineering and Management Institute, Federal University of Itajubá, Itajubá 37500-903, Brazil)

Abstract

To model the urban logistic environment, many variables need to be taken into account as this system is composed of different stakeholders with conflicting objectives and actions that influence the actions of others. Agent-based modeling (ABM) and simulations are useful tools for studying this environment with so many variables and uncertainties. Typically, urban logistic stakeholders are represented by agents who interact with each other and obey different rules. This study presents a conceptual framework for evaluating e-commerce urban freight using ABM and Design of Experiments (DoE). The simulations performed were designed to highlight the most important parameters that affect the response variable and should be taken into account in the experimentation process. The scenarios were studied to evaluate the use of Delivery Lockers (DLs) and failures in delivery attempts. The results of the DoE analysis allowed us to verify that the DL utilization rate, first attempt delivery failure rate, and truck stoppage time most impact costs and profits in the modeled system. The framework presented showed that the use of DoE in the simulation study reduced the number of simulated scenarios, which is a significant gain given the complexity of the model and the relatively large computational time required to execute a new scenario. Consequently, different studies may use the findings presented here to plan scenarios in their simulation projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Alves & Renato da Silva Lima & Leise Kelli De Oliveira & Alexandre Ferreira de Pinho, 2022. "Conceptual Framework for Evaluating E-Commerce Deliveries Using Agent-Based Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15505-:d:980230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15505/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15505/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holguín-Veras, José & Amaya Leal, Johanna & Sanchez-Diaz, Ivan & Browne, Michael & Wojtowicz, Jeffrey, 2020. "State of the art and practice of urban freight management Part II: Financial approaches, logistics, and demand management," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 383-410.
    2. Oliveira, Leise Kelli de & Morganti, Eleonora & Dablanc, Laetitia & Oliveira, Renata Lúcia Magalhães de, 2017. "Analysis of the potential demand of automated delivery stations for e-commerce deliveries in Belo Horizonte, Brazil," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 34-43.
    3. Ido Orenstein & Tal Raviv & Elad Sadan, 2019. "Flexible parcel delivery to automated parcel lockers: models, solution methods and analysis," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(5), pages 683-711, December.
    4. Happe, Kathrin, 2005. "Agent-Based Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis by Experimental Design and Metamodelling: An Application to Modelling Regional Structural Change," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24464, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Roberta Alves & Renato da Silva Lima & David Custódio de Sena & Alexandre Ferreira de Pinho & José Holguín-Veras, 2019. "Agent-Based Simulation Model for Evaluating Urban Freight Policy to E-Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Kim, Woojung & Holguín-Veras, José & Schmid, Joshua, 2021. "Adoption of delivery services in light of the COVID pandemic: Who and how long?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 270-286.
    7. Elbert, R. & Friedrich, C., 2018. "Simulation-based Evaluation of Urban Consolidation Centers Considering Urban Access Regulations," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 110820, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    8. Lachapelle, Ugo & Burke, Matthew & Brotherton, Aiden & Leung, Abraham, 2018. "Parcel locker systems in a car dominant city: Location, characterisation and potential impacts on city planning and consumer travel access," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-14.
    9. Lin, Yun Hui & Wang, Yuan & He, Dongdong & Lee, Loo Hay, 2020. "Last-mile delivery: Optimal locker location under multinomial logit choice model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Xuping Wang & Linmin Zhan & Junhu Ruan & Jun Zhang, 2014. "How to Choose “Last Mile” Delivery Modes for E-Fulfillment," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-11, June.
    11. Yael Deutsch & Boaz Golany, 2018. "A parcel locker network as a solution to the logistics last mile problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 251-261, January.
    12. Kim, Woojung & Wang, Xiaokun Cara, 2022. "The adoption of alternative delivery locations in New York City: Who and how far?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 127-140.
    13. Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin & Ng, Li Ting Wendy & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2018. "An investigation of customers’ intention to use self-collection services for last-mile delivery," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-8.
    14. José M. González-Varona & Félix Villafáñez & Fernando Acebes & Alfonso Redondo & David Poza, 2020. "Reusing Newspaper Kiosks for Last-Mile Delivery in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Weltevreden, Jesse W.J. & Rotem-Mindali, Orit, 2009. "Mobility effects of b2c and c2c e-commerce in the Netherlands: a quantitative assessment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 83-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alves, Roberta & Pereira, Cecília Aparecida & Lima, Renato da Silva, 2023. "Operational cost analysis for e-commerce deliveries using agent-based modeling and simulation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alves, Roberta & Pereira, Cecília Aparecida & Lima, Renato da Silva, 2023. "Operational cost analysis for e-commerce deliveries using agent-based modeling and simulation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. José M. González-Varona & Félix Villafáñez & Fernando Acebes & Alfonso Redondo & David Poza, 2020. "Reusing Newspaper Kiosks for Last-Mile Delivery in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Ashu Kedia & Diana Kusumastuti & Alan Nicholson, 2019. "Establishing Collection and Delivery Points to Encourage the Use of Active Transport: A Case Study in New Zealand Using a Consumer-Centric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Lin, Yunhui & Wang, Yuan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2022. "Profit-maximizing parcel locker location problem under threshold Luce model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Gabriele Iannaccone & Edoardo Marcucci & Valerio Gatta, 2021. "What Young E-Consumers Want? Forecasting Parcel Lockers Choice in Rome," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Leung, Abraham & Lachapelle, Ugo & Burke, Matthew, 2023. "Spatio-temporal analysis of Australia Post parcel locker use during the initial system growth phase in Queensland (2013–2017)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Mancini, Simona & Gansterer, Margaretha & Triki, Chefi, 2023. "Locker box location planning under uncertainty in demand and capacity availability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Mashalah, Heider Al & Hassini, Elkafi & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Bhatt (Mishra), Deepa, 2022. "The impact of digital transformation on supply chains through e-commerce: Literature review and a conceptual framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    10. John Olsson & Daniel Hellström & Henrik Pålsson, 2019. "Framework of Last Mile Logistics Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Kahr, Michael, 2022. "Determining locations and layouts for parcel lockers to support supply chain viability at the last mile," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    12. Schwerdfeger, Stefan & Boysen, Nils, 2020. "Optimizing the changing locations of mobile parcel lockers in last-mile distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1077-1094.
    13. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Kim, Woojung & Wang, Xiaokun Cara, 2022. "The adoption of alternative delivery locations in New York City: Who and how far?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 127-140.
    15. Vincent F. Yu & Hadi Susanto & Yu-Hsuan Yeh & Shih-Wei Lin & Yu-Tsung Huang, 2022. "The Vehicle Routing Problem with Simultaneous Pickup and Delivery and Parcel Lockers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Schaefer, Jaclyn S. & Figliozzi, Miguel A., 2021. "Spatial accessibility and equity analysis of Amazon parcel lockers facilities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    17. dos Santos, André Gustavo & Viana, Ana & Pedroso, João Pedro, 2022. "2-echelon lastmile delivery with lockers and occasional couriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Buldeo Rai, Heleen & Verlinde, Sara & Macharis, Cathy, 2021. "Unlocking the failed delivery problem? Opportunities and challenges for smart locks from a consumer perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Ranjbari, Andisheh & Diehl, Caleb & Dalla Chiara, Giacomo & Goodchild, Anne, 2023. "Do parcel lockers reduce delivery times? Evidence from the field," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    20. Peppel, Marcel & Ringbeck, Jürgen & Spinler, Stefan, 2022. "How will last-mile delivery be shaped in 2040? A Delphi-based scenario study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15505-:d:980230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.