IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13688-d950079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Wind Turbine Distances Using a Novel Techno-Spatial Approach in Complex Wind Farm Terrains

Author

Listed:
  • Bukurije Hoxha

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Prishtina “Hasan Prishtina”, 10 000 Prishtina, Kosovo
    Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University Ss Cyril and Methodius, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia)

  • Igor K. Shesho

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University Ss Cyril and Methodius, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia)

  • Risto V. Filkoski

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University Ss Cyril and Methodius, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia)

Abstract

Among the current challenges facing the energy sector is finding environmentally friendly and high-performance forms of energy generation. One such form of energy generation is from the wind. In addition to the fluctuations that cause changes in the generated energy, another factor that significantly affects the overall efficiency of wind farms is the distance between the turbines. In that context, a distance of at least three diameters (3D) onwards is necessary to enable a stable operation. This is more difficult to implement for mountainous terrain due to the terrain configuration’s influence, the turbine units’ positioning, and the mutual influence resulting from their position in the area under consideration. This work investigates the interdependence of the terrain features, the placement of ten turbines in different scenarios, and the impact on the overall efficiency of the wind farm. The place where the wind farm is considered is in Koznica, a mountainous area near Prishtina. An analysis has been carried out for two-diameter (2D), three-diameter (3D), and five-diameter (5D) turbine blade spacing for turbines with a rated power of 3.4 MW. The study considers placement in the following forms: Arc, I, L, M, and V. The results show that for 2D distance layout, the capacity factors for Arc, I, L, M, and V placements have the values: 32.9%, 29.8%, 31.1%, 30.6%, and 37.1%. For the 3D distance, according to these scenarios, the capacity factor values are: 29.9%, 30.8%, 30.4%, 29.3%, and 35.6%. For the longest distance, 5D, the capacity factor values are: 28.9%, 29.9%, 29.4%, 27.6%, and 30.6%. The value of the capacity factor for an optimal layout; is achieved at 39.3%.

Suggested Citation

  • Bukurije Hoxha & Igor K. Shesho & Risto V. Filkoski, 2022. "Analysis of Wind Turbine Distances Using a Novel Techno-Spatial Approach in Complex Wind Farm Terrains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13688-:d:950079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13688/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13688/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shakoor, Rabia & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri & Raheem, Abdur & Wu, Yuan-Kang, 2016. "Wake effect modeling: A review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen׳s model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1048-1059.
    2. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2016. "Optimization of wind turbine layout position in a wind farm using a newly-developed two-dimensional wake model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 192-200.
    3. Victoria Yildirir & Eugen Rusu & Florin Onea, 2022. "Wind Energy Assessments in the Northern Romanian Coastal Environment Based on 20 Years of Data Coming from Different Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Anne A. Gharaibeh & Deema A. Al-Shboul & Abdulla M. Al-Rawabdeh & Rasheed A. Jaradat, 2021. "Establishing Regional Power Sustainability and Feasibility Using Wind Farm Land-Use Optimization," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-32, April.
    5. Parada, Leandro & Herrera, Carlos & Flores, Paulo & Parada, Victor, 2017. "Wind farm layout optimization using a Gaussian-based wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 531-541.
    6. Charlotte Bay Hasager & Leif Rasmussen & Alfredo Peña & Leo E. Jensen & Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, 2013. "Wind Farm Wake: The Horns Rev Photo Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Ismail Kamdar & Shahid Ali & Juntakan Taweekun & Hafiz Muhammad Ali, 2021. "Wind Farm Site Selection Using WAsP Tool for Application in the Tropical Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Li-Hsing Ho & Hung Sun & Tsun-Hung Tsai, 2019. "Research on 3D Painting in Virtual Reality to Improve Students’ Motivation of 3D Animation Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Fernando Porté-Agel & Yu-Ting Wu & Chang-Hung Chen, 2013. "A Numerical Study of the Effects of Wind Direction on Turbine Wakes and Power Losses in a Large Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Siddik Shakul Hameed & Ramesh Ramadoss & Kannadasan Raju & GM Shafiullah, 2022. "A Framework-Based Wind Forecasting to Assess Wind Potential with Improved Grey Wolf Optimization and Support Vector Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, April.
    11. Muhammed Y. Worku, 2022. "Recent Advances in Energy Storage Systems for Renewable Source Grid Integration: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Athanasios Zisos & Georgia-Konstantina Sakki & Andreas Efstratiadis, 2023. "Mixing Renewable Energy with Pumped Hydropower Storage: Design Optimization under Uncertainty and Other Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Hassna Salime & Badre Bossoufi & Youness El Mourabit & Saad Motahhir, 2023. "Robust Nonlinear Adaptive Control for Power Quality Enhancement of PMSG Wind Turbine: Experimental Control Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao, Siyu & Xu, Qingshan & Feijóo, Andrés & Zheng, Gang & Zhou, Jiemin, 2020. "Wind farm layout optimization with a three-dimensional Gaussian wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 553-569.
    2. Tao, Siyu & Xu, Qingshan & Feijóo, Andrés & Zheng, Gang & Zhou, Jiemin, 2020. "Nonuniform wind farm layout optimization: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Azlan, F. & Kurnia, J.C. & Tan, B.T. & Ismadi, M.-Z., 2021. "Review on optimisation methods of wind farm array under three classical wind condition problems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Yang, Xiaolei & Pakula, Maggie & Sotiropoulos, Fotis, 2018. "Large-eddy simulation of a utility-scale wind farm in complex terrain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 767-777.
    5. Cao, Lichao & Ge, Mingwei & Gao, Xiaoxia & Du, Bowen & Li, Baoliang & Huang, Zhi & Liu, Yongqian, 2022. "Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    6. Pollini, Nicolò, 2022. "Topology optimization of wind farm layouts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1015-1027.
    7. Ge, Mingwei & Wu, Ying & Liu, Yongqian & Li, Qi, 2019. "A two-dimensional model based on the expansion of physical wake boundary for wind-turbine wakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 975-984.
    8. Mohammed Ifkirne & Houssam El Bouhi & Siham Acharki & Quoc Bao Pham & Abdelouahed Farah & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, 2022. "Multi-Criteria GIS-Based Analysis for Mapping Suitable Sites for Onshore Wind Farms in Southeast France," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    9. Antonio Colmenar-Santos & Severo Campíez-Romero & Lorenzo Alfredo Enríquez-Garcia & Clara Pérez-Molina, 2014. "Simplified Analysis of the Electric Power Losses for On-Shore Wind Farms Considering Weibull Distribution Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-30, October.
    10. Kyoungboo Yang, 2020. "Determining an Appropriate Parameter of Analytical Wake Models for Energy Capture and Layout Optimization on Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Li, Qing'an & Cai, Chang & Kamada, Yasunari & Maeda, Takao & Hiromori, Yuto & Zhou, Shuni & Xu, Jianzhong, 2021. "Prediction of power generation of two 30 kW Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines with Gaussian model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing & Gao, Xiaoxia, 2019. "Investigation into spacing restriction and layout optimization of wind farm with multiple types of wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 637-650.
    13. Li, Qing'an & Maeda, Takao & Kamada, Yasunari & Hiromori, Yuto, 2018. "Investigation of wake characteristic of a 30 kW rated power Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine with wake model and field measurement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1190-1204.
    14. Nicolas Kirchner-Bossi & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "Realistic Wind Farm Layout Optimization through Genetic Algorithms Using a Gaussian Wake Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Li, Qing'an & Wang, Ye & Kamada, Yasunari & Maeda, Takao & Xu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Shuni & Zhang, Fanghong & Cai, Chang, 2022. "Diagonal inflow effect on the wake characteristics of a horizontal axis wind turbine with Gaussian model and field measurements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    16. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing, 2018. "Study on an innovative three-dimensional wind turbine wake model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 483-493.
    17. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2016. "Optimization of wind turbine layout position in a wind farm using a newly-developed two-dimensional wake model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 192-200.
    18. Zhou, Huanyu & Qiu, Yingning & Feng, Yanhui & Liu, Jing, 2022. "Power prediction of wind turbine in the wake using hybrid physical process and machine learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 568-586.
    19. Davide Astolfi & Francesco Castellani, 2019. "Wind Turbine Power Curve Upgrades: Part II," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Kaldellis, John K. & Triantafyllou, Panagiotis & Stinis, Panagiotis, 2021. "Critical evaluation of Wind Turbines’ analytical wake models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13688-:d:950079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.