IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13387-d945074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modern Methods of Sustainable Behaviour Analysis—The Case of Purchasing FMCG

Author

Listed:
  • Konrad Biercewicz

    (Institute of Management, Faculty of Economics, Finance and Management, University of Szczecin, ul. Cukrowa 8, 71-004 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Urszula Chrąchol-Barczyk

    (Institute of Management, Faculty of Economics, Finance and Management, University of Szczecin, ul. Cukrowa 8, 71-004 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Jarosław Duda

    (Institute of Management, Faculty of Economics, Finance and Management, University of Szczecin, ul. Cukrowa 8, 71-004 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Wiścicka-Fernando

    (Institute of Management, Faculty of Economics, Finance and Management, University of Szczecin, ul. Cukrowa 8, 71-004 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

In this manuscript, the authors aim to explore sustainable consumer behaviour during shopping at a self-service store with fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG). An innovative combination of virtual reality (VR) equipment and an electroencephalogram (EEG) was used in the study. The objective of the study was to gather information as to how consumers make shopping decisions when buying fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG). The studies conducted so far have used either VR or EEG. To the best knowledge of the authors, no results of a study from the FMCG sector using both these devices simultaneously have ever been published. The results of the pilot studies are presented in the paper. The presented results constitute a part of a wider research project within the scope of which a triangulation of the research methods was used, enabling deeper analyses to be conducted of conscious and non-conscious aspects of the study subjects. The authors analysed primary data indicative of sustainable consumer behaviour. Descriptive statistics, including such measures as a mean value, standard deviation, and correlation analysis, as well as the Valence/Arousal Index, were used. The conducted studies provided knowledge of sustainable behaviour for two types of consumers – non-routine and considerate. Moreover, emotion indicators for FMCG products were defined, out of which the highest satisfaction was recorded for salmon as a product.

Suggested Citation

  • Konrad Biercewicz & Urszula Chrąchol-Barczyk & Jarosław Duda & Małgorzata Wiścicka-Fernando, 2022. "Modern Methods of Sustainable Behaviour Analysis—The Case of Purchasing FMCG," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13387-:d:945074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13387/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13387/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Loxton & Robert Truskett & Brigitte Scarf & Laura Sindone & George Baldry & Yinong Zhao, 2020. "Consumer Behaviour during Crises: Preliminary Research on How Coronavirus Has Manifested Consumer Panic Buying, Herd Mentality, Changing Discretionary Spending and the Role of the Media in Influencing," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Bogdan Wierzbiński & Tomasz Surmacz & Wiesława Kuźniar & Lucyna Witek, 2021. "The Role of the Ecological Awareness and the Influence on Food Preferences in Shaping Pro-Ecological Behavior of Young Consumers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. C. Lanier Benkard & Ali Yurukoglu & Anthony Lee Zhang, 2021. "Concentration in Product Markets," NBER Working Papers 28745, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
      • Benkard, C. Lanier & Yurukoglu, Ali & Zhang, Anthony Lee, 2021. "Concentration in Product Markets," Working Papers 308, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    4. Lerner, Jennifer & Han, Seunghee & Keltner, Dacher, 2007. "Feelings and Consumer Decision Making: Extending the Appraisal-Tendency Framework," Scholarly Articles 37143006, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    5. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2021. "Shopping in virtual reality: A literature review and future agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 37-58.
    6. Fang Qiu & Qifan Hu & Bing Xu, 2020. "Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain Coordination and Volume Loss Reduction Based on Strategic Consumer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Bechara, Antoine & Damasio, Antonio R., 2005. "The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 336-372, August.
    8. Jung, Jaesuk & Yu, Jihye & Seo, Yuri & Ko, Eunju, 2021. "Consumer experiences of virtual reality: Insights from VR luxury brand fashion shows," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 517-524.
    9. Datta, Subhadeep & Mukherjee, Sourjo, 2022. "In families we trust: Family firm branding and consumer’s reaction to product harm crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 257-268.
    10. Lombart, Cindy & Millan, Elena & Normand, Jean-Marie & Verhulst, Adrien & Labbé-Pinlon, Blandine & Moreau, Guillaume, 2019. "Consumer perceptions and purchase behavior toward imperfect fruits and vegetables in an immersive virtual reality grocery store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 28-40.
    11. Ihsan Ullah Jan & Seonggoo Ji & Chankoo Yeo, 2019. "Values and Green Product Purchase Behavior: The Moderating Effects of the Role of Government and Media Exposure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jimin Xiong & Zhanfeng Tang & Yufeng Zhu & Kefeng Xu & Yanhong Yin & Yang Xi, 2021. "Change of Consumption Behaviours in the Pandemic of COVID-19: Examining Residents’ Consumption Expenditure and Driving Determinants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Dow Alexander & Dow Sheila C., 2011. "Animal Spirits Revisited," Capitalism and Society, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Da Silva, Sergio, 2009. "Does Macroeconomics Need Microeconomic Foundations?," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 3, pages 1-11.
    4. Norbert Bajkó & Zsolt Fülöp & Kinga Nagyné Pércsi, 2022. "Changes in the Innovation- and Marketing-Habits of Family SMEs in the Foodstuffs Industry, Caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Hamelin, Nicolas & Bonelli, Marco I., 2022. "Traders’ anticipatory feelings and traders’ profitability: An exploratory study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    6. Steven J. Stanton & Crystal Reeck & Scott A. Huettel & Kevin S. LaBar, 2014. "Effects of induced moods on economic choices," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9(2), pages 167-175, March.
    7. Adam, Marc T.P. & Astor, Philipp J. & Krämer, Jan, 2016. "Affective Images, Emotion Regulation and Bidding Behavior: An Experiment on the Influence of Competition and Community Emotions in Internet Auctions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 56-69.
    8. Ostovan, Nima & Khalili Nasr, Arash, 2022. "The manifestation of luxury value dimensions in brand engagement in self-concept," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Michael G. Luchs & Minu Kumar, 2017. "“Yes, but this Other One Looks Better/Works Better”: How do Consumers Respond to Trade-offs Between Sustainability and Other Valued Attributes?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 567-584, February.
    10. Kyra L Wiggin & Martin Reimann & Shailendra P Jain & Darren W Dahl & Margaret C Campbell & Paul M Herr, 2019. "Curiosity Tempts Indulgence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(6), pages 1194-1212.
    11. Rengifo, Erick W. & Trifan, Emanuela, 2007. "Investors Facing Risk: Loss Aversion and Wealth Allocation Between Risky and Risk-Free Assets," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 28063, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    12. Timo Ehrig & Jaison Manjaly & Aditya Singh & Shyam Sunder, 2022. "Adaptive Rationality in Strategic Interaction: Do Emotions Regulate Thinking About Others?," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 330-349, December.
    13. Qayyum, Abdul & Jamil, Raja Ahmed & Shah, Adnan Muhammad & Lee, KangYoon, 2023. "Inclusive advertising featuring disability on instagram: Effect on consumer well-being, brand engagement, and purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    14. Yaprak Kurtsal & Davide Viaggi, 2020. "Exploring Collaboration and Consumer Behavior in Food Community Networks and Constraints Preventing Active Participation: The Case of Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    15. Dominika Mesinger & Aneta Ocieczek & Witold Kozirok & Tomasz Owczarek, 2023. "Attitudes of Young Tri-City Residents toward Game Meat in the Context of Food Neophobia and a Tendency to Look for Diversity in Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Choi, Dayeon & Seo, Yuri & Septianto, Felix & Ko, Eunju, 2022. "Luxury customization and self-authenticity: Implications for consumer wellbeing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 243-252.
    17. Trujillo, Carlos A., 2008. "Book essay on Flemming Hansen and Sverre Riis Christensen (2007), Emotions, advertising and consumer choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(9), pages 982-985, September.
    18. Ivan Barreda-Tarrazona & Ainhoa Jaramillo-Gutierrez & Daniel Navarro-Martinez & Gerardo Sabater-Grande, 2014. "The role of forgone opportunities in decision making under risk," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 167-188, October.
    19. Stephanie Lichtenfeld & Vanessa L Buechner & Markus A Maier & Maria Fernández-Capo, 2015. "Forgive and Forget: Differences between Decisional and Emotional Forgiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-11, May.
    20. Klaus Wälde & Agnes Moors, 2016. "Current Emotion Research in Economics," Working Papers 1612, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13387-:d:945074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.