IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13011-d939340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Daily Activity Space for Various Generations in the Yogyakarta Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • Sakinah Fathrunnadi Shalihati

    (Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
    Geography Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Purwokerto 53182, Indonesia)

  • Andri Kurniawan

    (Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Sri Rum Giyarsih

    (Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Djaka Marwasta

    (Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Dimas Bayu Endrayana Dharmowijoyo

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia
    Institute of Transport and Infrastructure, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia
    School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
    Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Janabadra, Yogyakarta 55231, Indonesia)

Abstract

Two indices of activity space measurements using Euclidian distance measurements have been argued to be able to measure specific visited out-of-home activity locations closer to activity space definitions than other methods. However, the Euclidian distance does not consider any barriers or obstacles, such as the existence of public spaces (e.g., army bases, government offices and airports) or natural barriers (e.g., mountains, hills and agricultural fields that have no road infrastructure). Therefore, this study tries to fill the research gap by measuring the two indices using road network distance. Moreover, this study tries to determine whether the activity space of different generations, namely Generations (Gens) X, Y and Z, is significantly different, and whether some socio-demographic and activity pattern variables can help differentiate the activity space measurements. Using the 2019 Yogyakarta Metropolitan Area (YMA) dataset, this study confirms that measuring activity space using road network distance statistically gives different results from activity space measured using Euclidian distance. Moreover, this study confirms that the oldest generation had opposite activity space patterns in comparison to Gens Y and Z. Unlike the younger ones, the oldest generation visited out-of-home activity locations nearer to their home locations on weekdays but expanded to visit farther out-of-home locations on weekends. Trade-off mechanisms were found between weekdays and weekends, by which Gens X and Y significantly visited out-of-home activity locations farther from their home more often on weekends than on weekdays. However, all generations were observed to visit out-of-home activity locations near their out-of-home activity anchors every day, whereas the oldest tended more often to visit the activity locations farther from their out-of-home activity anchors than the younger generations on Fridays and Sundays.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakinah Fathrunnadi Shalihati & Andri Kurniawan & Sri Rum Giyarsih & Djaka Marwasta & Dimas Bayu Endrayana Dharmowijoyo, 2022. "Daily Activity Space for Various Generations in the Yogyakarta Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13011-:d:939340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schönfelder, Stefan & Axhausen, Kay W., 2003. "Activity spaces: measures of social exclusion?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 273-286, October.
    2. van den Berg, Pauline & Sharmeen, Fariya & Weijs-Perrée, Minou, 2017. "On the subjective quality of social Interactions: Influence of neighborhood walkability, social cohesion and mobility choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 309-319.
    3. Zhang, Wen & Susilo, Yusak O. & Ahmad Termida, Nursitihazlin, 2016. "Investigating the interactions between travellers' familiar areas and their multi-day activity locations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 61-73.
    4. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Response to Commentaries on “Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?”," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(2), pages 151-158, April.
    5. Li, Ran & Tong, Daoqin, 2016. "Constructing human activity spaces: A new approach incorporating complex urban activity-travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 23-35.
    6. Dimas B. E. Dharmowijoyo & Yusak O. Susilo & Anders Karlström, 2018. "On complexity and variability of individuals’ discretionary activities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 177-204, January.
    7. Etminani-Ghasrodashti, Roya & Ardeshiri, Mahyar, 2016. "The impacts of built environment on home-based work and non-work trips: An empirical study from Iran," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 196-207.
    8. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 7-18, January.
    9. Zachary Patterson & Steven Farber, 2015. "Potential Path Areas and Activity Spaces in Application: A Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 679-700, November.
    10. Jun, Myung-Jin & Choi, Keechoo & Jeong, Ji-Eun & Kwon, Ki-Hyun & Kim, Hee-Jae, 2015. "Land use characteristics of subway catchment areas and their influence on subway ridership in Seoul," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 30-40.
    11. Nodjomian, Adam T. & Kockelman, Kara, 2019. "How does the built environment affect interest in the ownership and use of self-driving vehicles?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 115-134.
    12. Delbosc, Alexa & Nakanishi, Hitomi, 2017. "A life course perspective on the travel of Australian millennials," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 319-336.
    13. Tim Schwanen & Donggen Wang, 2014. "Well-Being, Context, and Everyday Activities in Space and Time," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(4), pages 833-851, July.
    14. Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Chen, Cynthia, 2004. "TTB or not TTB, that is the question: a review and analysis of the empirical literature on travel time (and money) budgets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(9-10), pages 643-675.
    15. Charles Raux & Tai-Yu Ma & Eric Cornelis, 2011. "Variability versus stability in daily travel and activity behaviour. The case of a one week travel diary," Working Papers halshs-00612610, HAL.
    16. Asif Ahmed & Peter Stopher, 2014. "Seventy Minutes Plus or Minus 10 - A Review of Travel Time Budget Studies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 607-625, September.
    17. Muhamad Rizki & Tri Basuki Joewono & Dimas B. E. Dharmowijoyo & Prawira Fajarindra Belgiawan, 2021. "Does multitasking improve the travel experience of public transport users? Investigating the activities during commuter travels in the Bandung Metropolitan Area, Indonesia," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 429-454, June.
    18. Kang, Hejun & Scott, Darren M., 2010. "Exploring day-to-day variability in time use for household members," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 609-619, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Jixiang & Wang, Bo & Xiao, Longzhu, 2021. "Non-linear associations between built environment and active travel for working and shopping: An extreme gradient boosting approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Miotti, Marco & Needell, Zachary A. & Jain, Rishee K., 2023. "The impact of urban form on daily mobility demand and energy use: Evidence from the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    3. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Næss, Petter, 2018. "Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 107-117.
    4. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu & Liu, Chao, 2019. "How does the station-area built environment influence Metrorail ridership? Using gradient boosting decision trees to identify non-linear thresholds," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-78.
    5. Jixiang Liu & Longzhu Xiao, 2024. "Socioeconomic differences in effect size: predicting commuting mode choice of migrants and locals using a light gradient boosting approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Erick Guerra & Shengxiao Li & Ariadna Reyes, 2022. "How do low-income commuters get to work in US and Mexican cities? A comparative empirical assessment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 75-96, January.
    7. Faan Chen & Adriano Borges Costa, 2024. "Exploring the causal effects of the built environment on travel behavior: a unique randomized experiment in Shanghai," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 215-245, February.
    8. Liu, Chengxi & Susilo, Yusak O. & Dharmowijoyo, Dimas B.E., 2018. "Investigating intra-household interactions between individuals' time and space constraints," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 108-119.
    9. Dimas Bayu Endrayana Dharmowijoyo & Yusak Octavius Susilo & Tri Basuki Joewono, 2021. "Residential Locations and Health Effects on Multitasking Behaviours and Day Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Arif Budiarto & Nur Shalin Abdi & Dimas Bayu Endrayana Dharmowijoyo & Nursitihazlin Ahmad Termida & Basil David Daniel & Nur Sabahiah Abdul Sukor & Liza Evianti Tanjung, 2022. "Effects of Changes in Discretionary Trips and Online Activities on Social and Mental Health during Two Different Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    11. Donggen Wang & Tao Lin, 2019. "Built environment, travel behavior, and residential self-selection: a study based on panel data from Beijing, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 51-74, February.
    12. Zhu, Pengyu & Tan, Xinying & Zhao, Songnian & Shi, Shuai & Wang, Mingshu, 2022. "Land use regulations, transit investment, and commuting preferences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    13. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu & Yu, Bin & Ju, Yang, 2021. "Non-linear associations between zonal built environment attributes and transit commuting mode choice accounting for spatial heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 22-35.
    14. Mitra, Suman K. & Saphores, Jean-Daniel M., 2019. "Why do they live so far from work? Determinants of long-distance commuting in California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. Kailai Wang & Xize Wang, 2022. "Generational Differences in Automobility: Comparing America's Millennials and Gen Xers Using Gradient Boosting Decision Trees," Papers 2206.11056, arXiv.org.
    16. Mitra, Suman K. & Saphores, Jean-Daniel M., 2017. "Carless in California: Green choice or misery?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-12.
    17. Chowdhury, Tufayel & Scott, Darren M., 2020. "An analysis of the built environment and auto travel in Halifax, Canada," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 23-33.
    18. Holz-Rau, Christian & Scheiner, Joachim, 2019. "Land-use and transport planning – A field of complex cause-impact relationships. Thoughts on transport growth, greenhouse gas emissions and the built environment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 127-137.
    19. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    20. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Dirty density: Air quality and the density of American cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13011-:d:939340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.