IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12493-d930618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Biomass Fuel Composition for Rubber Glove Manufacturing in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Laddawan Thep-On

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

  • Shahariar Chowdhury

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
    Environmental Assessment and Technology for Hazardous Waste Management Research Center, Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

  • Kua-Anan Taechato

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
    Environmental Assessment and Technology for Hazardous Waste Management Research Center, Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

  • Anil Kumar

    (Centre for Energy and Environment, Delhi Technological University, Delhi 110042, India)

  • Issara Chanakaewsomboon

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
    The Sustainable Innovation Center (SIC-PSU), Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

Abstract

The demand for rubber gloves has significantly increased in both medical and non-medical fields due to the spread of the coronavirus in 2019. It is challenging for rubber glove manufacturing industries to balance the production and demand for the product. Additionally, they must determine techniques to decrease the production costs so as to make rubber gloves more economical for consumers. Generally, natural gas, fossil fuels, and renewable energy sources are used worldwide in the manufacturing of rubber gloves. In addition, Thailand uses biomass energy for rubber glove production, but biomass utilization is not economically friendly. This study used different biomasses as fuel in rubber glove production so as to reduce production costs and make the process more environmentally friendly. Wood chip (WC), palm kernel shells (PKS), and oil palm mesocarp fiber (OPMF) biomass were collected from local regions and used in different ratios. The samples of WC, PKS, and OPMF were prepared in four different ratios, namely, 88:12:0, 85:15:0, 85:13:2, and 85:10:5, for efficient biomass utilization. The 85:10:5 (WC: PKS: OPMF) ratio was found to be the optimal ratio as the annual production costs of rubber gloves significantly decreased to USD 1.64 per 1000 units of gloves. Furthermore, this biomass ratio also showed the best boiler efficiency of 74.87%. Therefore, WC, PKS, and OPMF biomass are recommended as fuel for rubber glove industries to make sustainable and economical production processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Laddawan Thep-On & Shahariar Chowdhury & Kua-Anan Taechato & Anil Kumar & Issara Chanakaewsomboon, 2022. "Optimization of Biomass Fuel Composition for Rubber Glove Manufacturing in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12493-:d:930618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12493/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmad, Farah B. & Zhang, Zhanying & Doherty, William O.S. & O'Hara, Ian M., 2019. "The outlook of the production of advanced fuels and chemicals from integrated oil palm biomass biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 386-411.
    2. Carneiro, Patrícia & Ferreira, Paula, 2012. "The economic, environmental and strategic value of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 17-22.
    3. Sunday Yusuf Kpalo & Mohamad Faiz Zainuddin & Latifah Abd Manaf & Ahmad Muhaimin Roslan, 2020. "A Review of Technical and Economic Aspects of Biomass Briquetting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonel Jorge Ribeiro Nunes & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias, 2019. "Technological Innovation in Biomass Energy for the Sustainable Growth of Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Liu, Liwei & Ye, Junhong & Zhao, Yufei & Zhao, Erdong, 2015. "The plight of the biomass power generation industry in China – A supply chain risk perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 680-692.
    3. Anita Konieczna & Kamila Mazur & Adam Koniuszy & Andrzej Gawlik & Igor Sikorski, 2022. "Thermal Energy and Exhaust Emissions of a Gasifier Stove Feeding Pine and Hemp Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Paiano, Annarita & Lagioia, Giovanni, 2016. "Energy potential from residual biomass towards meeting the EU renewable energy and climate targets. The Italian case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 161-173.
    5. Chen, Wei & Fang, Yang & Li, Kaixu & Chen, Zhiqun & Xia, Mingwei & Gong, Meng & Chen, Yingquan & Yang, Haiping & Tu, Xin & Chen, Hanping, 2020. "Bamboo wastes catalytic pyrolysis with N-doped biochar catalyst for phenols products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Lacrimioara Senila & Ioan Tenu & Petru Carlescu & Daniela Alexandra Scurtu & Eniko Kovacs & Marin Senila & Oana Cadar & Marius Roman & Diana Elena Dumitras & Cecilia Roman, 2022. "Characterization of Biobriquettes Produced from Vineyard Wastes as a Solid Biofuel Resource," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Kugelmeier, Cristie Luis & Monteiro, Marcos Roberto & da Silva, Rodrigo & Kuri, Sebastião Elias & Sordi, Vitor Luiz & Della Rovere, Carlos Alberto, 2021. "Corrosion behavior of carbon steel, stainless steel, aluminum and copper upon exposure to biodiesel blended with petrodiesel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Rosa Martins & Haylemar de Nazaret Cardenas-Rodriguez & Levy Ely Lacerda Oliveira & Erik Leandro Bonaldi & Frederico de Oliveira Assuncao & Germano Lambert-Torres & Helcio Francisco Villa-Nova & Wilso, 2022. "Technical and Economic Analysis of the Implementation of a Self-Sustainable Briquetting Process for Electric Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Gigel Paraschiv & Georgiana Moiceanu & Gheorghe Voicu & Mihai Chitoiu & Petru Cardei & Mirela Nicoleta Dinca & Paula Tudor, 2021. "Optimization Issues of a Hammer Mill Working Process Using Statistical Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Nabila, Rakhmawati & Hidayat, Wahyu & Haryanto, Agus & Hasanudin, Udin & Iryani, Dewi Agustina & Lee, Sihyun & Kim, Sangdo & Kim, Soohyun & Chun, Donghyuk & Choi, Hokyung & Im, Hyuk & Lim, Jeonghwan &, 2023. "Oil palm biomass in Indonesia: Thermochemical upgrading and its utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Sunday Yusuf Kpalo & Mohamad Faiz Zainuddin & Latifah Abd Manaf & Ahmad Muhaimin Roslan & Nik Nor Rahimah Nik Ab Rahim, 2022. "Techno-Economic Viability Assessment of a Household Scale Agricultural Residue Composite Briquette Project for Rural Communities in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Shafie, S.M. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Masjuki, H.H. & Ahmad-Yazid, A., 2012. "A review on electricity generation based on biomass residue in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5879-5889.
    13. Lim, Chun Hsion & Lim, Steven & How, Bing Shen & Ng, Wendy Pei Qin & Ngan, Sue Lin & Leong, Wei Dong & Lam, Hon Loong, 2021. "A review of industry 4.0 revolution potential in a sustainable and renewable palm oil industry: HAZOP approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    14. Anabela Botelho & Lina Lourenço-Gomes & Lígia Pinto & Sara Sousa & Marieta Valente, 2016. "Using stated preference methods to assess environmental impacts of forest biomass power plants in Portugal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 1323-1337, October.
    15. Abdul-Hamid, Asma-Qamaliah & Ali, Mohd Helmi & Osman, Lokhman Hakim & Tseng, Ming-Lang & Lim, Ming K., 2022. "Industry 4.0 quasi-effect between circular economy and sustainability: Palm oil industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    16. Cartelle Barros, Juan José & Lara Coira, Manuel & de la Cruz López, María Pilar & del Caño Gochi, Alfredo, 2016. "Probabilistic life-cycle cost analysis for renewable and non-renewable power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 774-787.
    17. Suhartini, Sri & Rohma, Novita Ainur & Mardawati, Efri & Kasbawati, & Hidayat, Nur & Melville, Lynsey, 2022. "Biorefining of oil palm empty fruit bunches for bioethanol and xylitol production in Indonesia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    18. Gerrit Ralf Surup & Hamideh Kaffash & Yan Ma & Anna Trubetskaya & Johan Berg Pettersen & Merete Tangstad, 2022. "Life Cycle Based Climate Emissions of Charcoal Conditioning Routes for the Use in the Ferro-Alloy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, May.
    19. Faiza Ali Yusuf & Faradiella Mohd Kusin & Sunday Yusuf Kpalo, 2021. "Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Regarding Charcoal Consumption among Households in Sanaag Province, North-Eastern Somalia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    20. Esteban, Bernat & Riba, Jordi-Roger & Baquero, Grau & Rius, Antoni, 2015. "Comparative cost evaluation of heating oil and small-scale wood chips produced from Euro-Mediterranean forests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 568-575.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12493-:d:930618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.