IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6606-d826323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Using Quantitative Methods in Agricultural Processing Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Asimina Kouriati

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Christina Moulogianni

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Georgios Kountios

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3036, Cyprus)

  • Thomas Bournaris

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Eleni Dimitriadou

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • George Papadavid

    (Agricultural Research Institute Cyprus, Athalassa, Nicosia 1516, Cyprus)

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate critical success factors (CSFs), considering the perspectives of various stakeholders who are involved in enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation in agricultural processing companies in Central Macedonia (Greece). This evaluation—combined with aspects from the literature—may show how a digital production system can be managed and redesigned to become sustainable for a company. Research was conducted through the use of a specially designed questionnaire that was addressed to various stakeholders in the ERP implementation in agricultural processing companies. Descriptive statistics, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA), and Friedman test methods were used in order for relevant information to be identified and valid conclusions to be drawn. Given the results of the grey relational analysis (GRA), respondents consider 33 out of 37 critical success factors to be “very important”. Friedman test results seem to differ from GRA results in 19 out of 37 factors with regard to their ranking. Based on this, and using two different methods, the most important ERP critical success factors are highlighted. For the objective aim of this paper to be fulfilled, there is a contribution giving insights into stakeholders’ perspectives regarding the management of a digital production system in the field of agricultural processing companies. It also contributes to the literature, as it highlights methods that refer to the evaluation of critical success factors for ERP implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Asimina Kouriati & Christina Moulogianni & Georgios Kountios & Thomas Bournaris & Eleni Dimitriadou & George Papadavid, 2022. "Evaluation of Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Using Quantitative Methods in Agricultural Processing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6606-:d:826323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byungchan Ahn & Hyunchul Ahn, 2020. "Factors Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud-Based ERP from a Comprehensive Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Stefan Hack & Christian Berg, 2014. "The Potential of IT for Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Raul Oltra-Badenes & Hermenegildo Gil-Gomez & Vicente Guerola-Navarro & Pau Vicedo, 2019. "Is It Possible to Manage the Product Recovery Processes in an ERP? Analysis of Functional Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Botta-Genoulaz, Valerie & Millet, Pierre-Alain, 2006. "An investigation into the use of ERP systems in the service sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1-2), pages 202-221, February.
    5. Shaio Yan Huang & An An Chiu & Po Chi Chao & Arniati Arniati, 2019. "Critical Success Factors in Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Systems for Sustainable Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-42, November.
    6. Valerie Botta-Genoulaz & Pierre-Alain Millet, 2006. "An investigation into the use of ERP systems in the service sector," Post-Print hal-00266991, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saeed Kamranfar & Farid Damirchi & Mitra Pourvaziri & Pardayev Abdunabi Xalikovich & Samira Mahmoudkelayeh & Reza Moezzi & Amir Vadiee, 2023. "A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling Analysis of the Primary Barriers to Sustainable Construction in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Patricia Oyarzún-Diaz & Ana Orellana-Cortés & Hugo Segura & Cristian Vidal-Silva & Aurora Sánchez-Ortiz & Jorge Serrano-Malebrán, 2023. "Sustainable Health Education Simulator Using Open-Source Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dalal Bamufleh & Maram Abdulrahman Almalki & Randa Almohammadi & Esraa Alharbi, 2021. "User Acceptance of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Higher Education Institutions: A Conceptual Model," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 17(1), pages 144-163, January.
    2. Jones, Derek C. & Kalmi, Panu & Kauhanen, Antti, 2011. "Firm and employee effects of an enterprise information system: Micro-econometric evidence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 159-168, April.
    3. Patryk Morawiec & Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz, 2022. "Cloud Computing, Big Data, and Blockchain Technology Adoption in ERP Implementation Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Dobrzykowski, David & Saboori Deilami, Vafa & Hong, Paul & Kim, Seung-Chul, 2014. "A structured analysis of operations and supply chain management research in healthcare (1982–2011)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 514-530.
    5. Dalal Bamufleh & Maram Abdulrahman Almalki & Randa Almohammadi & Esraa Alharbi, 2021. "User Acceptance of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Higher Education Institutions: A Conceptual Model," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 17(4), pages 138-157, October.
    6. Koh, S.C.L. & Gunasekaran, A. & Cooper, J.R., 2009. "The demand for training and consultancy investment in SME-specific ERP systems implementation and operation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 241-254, November.
    7. Philip Müller & Martin Franz, 2019. "Transnational labour migration and the offshoring of knowledge-intensive business services within global production networks: The case of a German automotive company in Turkey," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(6), pages 1350-1369, September.
    8. Alemayehu, Fikru K. & Kumbhakar, Subal C. & Landazuri Tveteraas, Sigbjørn, 2022. "Estimation of staff use efficiency: Evidence from the hospitality industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Mackelprang, Alan W. & Jayaram, Jayanth & Xu, Kefeng, 2012. "The influence of types of training on service system performance in mass service and service shop operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 183-194.
    10. Monika Woźniak, 2021. "Sustainable Approach in IT Project Management—Methodology Choice vs. Client Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Chang, Man-Kit & Cheung, Waiman & Cheng, Chun-Hung & Yeung, Jeff H.Y., 2008. "Understanding ERP system adoption from the user's perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 928-942, June.
    12. Muhammad Fiaz & Amir Ikram & Asad Ilyas, 2018. "Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Digitization of Healthcare Service Quality," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, July.
    13. Kanellou, Alexandra & Spathis, Charalambos, 2013. "Accounting benefits and satisfaction in an ERP environment," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 209-234.
    14. Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska & Hanna Łosyk, 2020. "An Approach to Assessing Sustainability in the Development of a Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Xiaxia Ma & Wenliang Bian & Wenchao Wei & Fei Wei, 2022. "Customer-Centric, Two-Product Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem under Consideration of Weighted Customer Waiting Time in Power Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Guerola-Navarro, Vicente & Gil-Gomez, Hermenegildo & Oltra-Badenes, Raul & Sendra-García, Javier, 2021. "Customer relationship management and its impact on innovation: A literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 83-87.
    17. Sayeed Salih & Samah Abdelsalam & Mosab Hamdan & Ashraf Osman Ibrahim & Anas W. Abulfaraj & Faisal Binzagr & Omayma Husain & Abdallah Elhigazi Abdallah, 2022. "The CSFs from the Perspective of Users in Achieving ERP System Implementation and Post-Implementation Success: A Case of Saudi Arabian Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Raul Oltra-Badenes & Hermenegildo Gil-Gomez & Vicente Guerola-Navarro & Pau Vicedo, 2019. "Is It Possible to Manage the Product Recovery Processes in an ERP? Analysis of Functional Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Elsa Diez-Busto & Lidia Sanchez-Ruiz & Ana Fernandez-Laviada, 2021. "The B Corp Movement: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, February.
    20. M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Ada M. Pérez-Pico & M. Luisa López-Pérez, 2019. "Does Social Network Sentiment Influence S&P 500 Environmental & Socially Responsible Index?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6606-:d:826323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.