IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11597-d660740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model for Optimizing the Ratios of the Company Suppliers in Slovak Automotive Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Jaroslava Kádárová

    (Department of Industrial and Digital Engineering, Institute of Industrial Engineering, Management and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Park Komenského 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Peter Trebuňa

    (Department of Industrial and Digital Engineering, Institute of Industrial Engineering, Management and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Park Komenského 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Laura Lachvajderová

    (Department of Industrial and Digital Engineering, Institute of Industrial Engineering, Management and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Park Komenského 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

The Slovak automotive industry consists of various companies and suppliers, with different positions in the supply chain for automotive manufacturers. The accuracy of component deliveries and their quality affect the ultimate competitiveness of the entire automotive industry. The creation of strategic partnerships and stable supplier–customer relationships is currently a necessity. The aim of the article is to design the model for optimizing the ratio of the company suppliers in the Slovak automotive industry. The basis for designing the model was the results of our own research focused on the quality and timeliness of component deliveries from various suppliers. Supply chain members work with multiple subcontractors, using multiple subcontractors to supply the same components. We analyzed the overall quality of delivered components at a certain stage of the supply chain. The quality of the supplied components was the sum of all items from all suppliers. The aim of the proposed model is to determine the optimal percentage of individual suppliers of a particular part so as to minimize the overall risk associated with the supply and inventory of a particular part for the customer. Research methodology was focused on identification of the key performance indicators and key risk indicators of components deliveries by different suppliers. Those indicators provide a basis for the effective results of further research. We designed and used an algorithm for preparing and evaluating the model for optimizing the ratio of the company suppliers in the Slovak automotive industry. This research used modeling methods, simulations, and optimization models. The proposed model was verified in the specific conditions of the automotive supply chain. Deliveries from two subcontractors were simulated. Based on the results of the simulations, the optimal supply ratio of the two subcontractors was determined for a specific component of a member of the supply chain at a higher level. The results of the research can be useful for different suppliers in the Slovak automotive industry. By partially modifying the model and adapting it for different conditions in other industries, the model of optimizing the distribution of supply from individual suppliers can be used for other supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaroslava Kádárová & Peter Trebuňa & Laura Lachvajderová, 2021. "Model for Optimizing the Ratios of the Company Suppliers in Slovak Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11597-:d:660740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11597/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11597/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christy, David P. & Grout, John R., 1994. "Safeguarding supply chain relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 233-242, October.
    2. Daniela Spirkova & Katarina Teplicka & Sona Hurna & Robert Janiss, 2021. "Evaluation of Energy Savings and Economic Benefits of SOLTAG Rooftop Extensions under the Conditions of a Model Area in the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Sabri, Ehap H. & Beamon, Benita M., 2000. "A multi-objective approach to simultaneous strategic and operational planning in supply chain design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 581-598, October.
    4. Alikhani, Reza & Torabi, S. Ali & Altay, Nezih, 2019. "Strategic supplier selection under sustainability and risk criteria," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 69-82.
    5. Goh, Mark & Lim, Joseph Y.S. & Meng, Fanwen, 2007. "A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 164-173, October.
    6. Lai, Guoming & Debo, Laurens G. & Sycara, Katia, 2009. "Sharing inventory risk in supply chain: The implication of financial constraint," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 811-825, August.
    7. Katarína Teplická & Martin Straka, 2020. "Sustainability of Extraction of Raw Material by a Combination of Mobile and Stationary Mining Machines and Optimization of Machine Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Mayyas, Ahmad & Qattawi, Ala & Omar, Mohammed & Shan, Dongri, 2012. "Design for sustainability in automotive industry: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 1845-1862.
    9. Bogataj, David & Bogataj, Marija, 2007. "Measuring the supply chain risk and vulnerability in frequency space," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 291-301, July.
    10. Roder, Axel & Tibken, Bernd, 2006. "A methodology for modeling inter-company supply chains and for evaluating a method of integrated product and process documentation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 1010-1029, March.
    11. Renata Turisová & Hana Pačaiová & Zuzana Kotianová & Anna Nagyová & Michal Hovanec & Peter Korba, 2021. "Evaluation of eMaintenance Application Based on the New Version of the EFQM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Martina Sukitsch & Sabrina Engert & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2015. "The Implementation of Corporate Sustainability in the European Automotive Industry: An Analysis of Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-28, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aqlan, Faisal & Lam, Sarah S., 2015. "A fuzzy-based integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 54-63.
    2. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    3. Iman Kazemian & Samin Aref, 2016. "Multi-echelon Supply Chain Flexibility Enhancement Through Detecting Bottlenecks," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 17(4), pages 357-372, December.
    4. Emenike, Scholastica N. & Falcone, Gioia, 2020. "A review on energy supply chain resilience through optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    5. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    6. Kanokporn Kungwalsong & Abraham Mendoza & Vasanth Kamath & Subramanian Pazhani & Jose Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo, 2022. "An application of interactive fuzzy optimization model for redesigning supply chain for resilience," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1803-1839, August.
    7. Garvey, Myles D. & Carnovale, Steven & Yeniyurt, Sengun, 2015. "An analytical framework for supply network risk propagation: A Bayesian network approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 618-627.
    8. Golini, Ruggero & Kalchschmidt, Matteo, 2015. "Managing inventories in global sourcing contexts: A contingency perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 64-78.
    9. Nickel, Stefan & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Ziegler, Hans-Peter, 2012. "A multi-stage stochastic supply network design problem with financial decisions and risk management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 511-524.
    10. Amulya Gurtu & Jestin Johny, 2021. "Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Geoffrey Barongo Omosa & Solange Ayuni Numfor & Monika Kosacka-Olejnik, 2023. "Modeling a Reverse Logistics Supply Chain for End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling Risk Management: A Fuzzy Risk Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Baghalian, Atefeh & Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani, 2013. "Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 199-215.
    13. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    14. Jiao Wang & Lima Zhao & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2021. "Operations‐Finance Interface in Risk Management: Research Evolution and Opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 355-389, February.
    15. Feng, Yi & Mu, Yinping & Hu, Benyong & Kumar, Arun, 2014. "Commodity options purchasing and credit financing under capital constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 230-237.
    16. Pokharel, Shaligram, 2008. "A two objective model for decision making in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 378-388, February.
    17. Hashem Omrani & Farzane Adabi & Narges Adabi, 2017. "Designing an efficient supply chain network with uncertain data: a robust optimization—data envelopment analysis approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(7), pages 816-828, July.
    18. Mahdi Bashiri & Benny Tjahjono & Jordon Lazell & Jennifer Ferreira & Tomy Perdana, 2021. "The Dynamics of Sustainability Risks in the Global Coffee Supply Chain: A Case of Indonesia–UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Panos Kouvelis & Wenhui Zhao, 2012. "Financing the Newsvendor: Supplier vs. Bank, and the Structure of Optimal Trade Credit Contracts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 566-580, June.
    20. Sangwan, Thutchanan & Liangrokapart, Jirapan, 2015. "Risk Identification for Outbound Road Freight Transportation Service," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 20, pages 391-417, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11597-:d:660740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.