IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p11101-d651667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“White” Space and Organic Claims on Food Packaging: Communicating Sustainability Values and Affecting Young Adults’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Kostoula Margariti

    (Department of Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

The development of organic food products has proliferated over the past few decades, alongside the use of “white” space on products’ packaging as an element that communicates quality and sustainability values. Despite a growing interest towards green products, sustainable business practices and aesthetics, there is not enough evidence on how specific design elements (i.e., “white” space) of organic food packaging could affect consumers’ brand perceptions, attitude towards the brand (Abr) and purchase intentions (PI). The present study seeks to unveil the role of “white” space as a packaging design element on the effectiveness of organic food products. Based on a content analysis of 406 international packaging designs it establishes the widespread coexistence of organic products with extended, in shades of gray “white” space. A between-subjects experiment with 305 young adults builds on the associations between “white” space and sustainability, and provides evidence on the proposed serial mediation model with perceived naturalness, quality and trustworthiness, and Abr as mediators in the relationship between organic food products and PI, especially when the packaging uses extended “white” space. Pertinent managerial implications with respect to effective packaging design that promotes sustainability values and generates positive attitudes and behaviors towards organic foods are underlined.

Suggested Citation

  • Kostoula Margariti, 2021. "“White” Space and Organic Claims on Food Packaging: Communicating Sustainability Values and Affecting Young Adults’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:11101-:d:651667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/11101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/11101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Batte, Marvin T. & Hooker, Neal H. & Haab, Timothy C. & Beaverson, Jeremy, 2007. "Putting their money where their mouths are: Consumer willingness to pay for multi-ingredient, processed organic food products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 145-159, April.
    2. Fanny Thomas & Sonia Capelli, 2018. "The effect of the number of ingredient images on package evaluation and product choice," Post-Print hal-01832083, HAL.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Jian Wang & Yen Hsu, 2019. "Does Sustainable Perceived Value Play a Key Role in the Purchase Intention Driven by Product Aesthetics? Taking Smartwatch as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Canice M. C. Kwan & Xianchi Dai & Robert S. WyerJr., 2017. "Contextual Influences on Message Persuasion: The Effect of Empty Space," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(2), pages 448-464.
    6. John W. Pracejus & G. Douglas Olsen & Thomas C. O'Guinn, 2006. "How Nothing Became Something: White Space, Rhetoric, History, and Meaning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 82-90, June.
    7. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L., 1992. "Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 57-70, January.
    8. Martinho, Graça & Pires, Ana & Portela, Gonçalo & Fonseca, Miguel, 2015. "Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 58-68.
    9. Paulos, Bentham, 1998. "Green power in perspective: lessons from green marketing of consumer goods," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 46-55.
    10. Lohr, Luanne, 2001. "Factors Affecting International Demand And Trade In Organic Food Products," Faculty Series 16674, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    11. Pracejus, John W. & O'Guinn, Thomas C. & Olsen, G. Douglas, 2013. "When white space is more than “burning money”: Economic signaling meets visual commercial rhetoric," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 211-218.
    12. Bloch, Peter H & Brunel, Frederic F & Arnold, Todd J, 2003. "Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 551-565, March.
    13. Michela Balconi & Roberta Sebastiani & Laura Angioletti, 2019. "A Neuroscientific Approach to Explore Consumers’ Intentions Towards Sustainability within the Luxury Fashion Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Smith, Samantha & Paladino, Angela, 2010. "Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 93-104.
    15. Lise Magnier & Dominique Crié, 2015. "Communicating packaging eco-friendliness," Post-Print hal-01563044, HAL.
    16. van Doorn, Jenny & Verhoef, Peter C., 2011. "Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Fan & Lijuan Peng & Tinggui Chen & Guodong Cong, 2024. "Mining the impact of social media information on public green consumption attitudes: a framework based on ELM and text data mining," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. László Bendegúz Nagy & Brigitta Unger-Plasek & Zoltán Lakner & Ágoston Temesi, 2023. "Confidence in organic food: a cross-country choice based conjoint analysis of credibility factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Junyi Zhong & Jiazhen Huo, 2022. "Impacts of Power Structure on Introduction of Green Store Brand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-33, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charalampia N. Anastasiou & Kiriaki M. Keramitsoglou & Nikos Kalogeras & Maria I. Tsagkaraki & Ioanna Kalatzi & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis, 2017. "Can the “Euro-Leaf” Logo Affect Consumers’ Willingness-To-Buy and Willingness-To-Pay for Organic Food and Attract Consumers’ Preferences? An Empirical Study in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Dangelico, Rosa Maria & Alvino, Letizia & Fraccascia, Luca, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Patrycja Wojciechowska & Karolina Wiszumirska, 2022. "Sustainable Communication in the B2C Market—The Impact of Packaging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Alvino, Letizia & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Other publications TiSEM ed6b6a75-2a9f-4b6e-8076-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Xixiang Sun & Ziyuan Tian & Jianguo Wang & Weihuan Su, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental Commitment on Green Purchase Behavior in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Eteokleous, Pantelitsa P. & Christofi, Anna-Maria & Korfiatis, Nikolaos, 2022. "Drivers, outcomes, and moderators of consumer intention to buy organic goods: Meta-analysis, implications, and future agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 339-354.
    7. Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag, 2015. "Organic Food Perception: Fad, or Healthy and Environmentally Friendly? A Case on Romanian Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Favier, Manon & Celhay, Franck & Pantin-Sohier, Gaëlle, 2019. "Is less more or a bore? Package design simplicity and brand perception: an application to Champagne," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 11-20.
    9. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    10. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel & Stephan Zielke, 2017. "Can't Buy Me Green? A Review of Consumer Perceptions of and Behavior Toward the Price of Organic Food," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 211-251, March.
    11. Xuhui Wang & Frida Pacho & Jia Liu & Redempta Kajungiro, 2019. "Factors Influencing Organic Food Purchase Intention in Developing Countries and the Moderating Role of Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Michaelidou, Nina & Hassan, Louise M., 2010. "Modeling the factors affecting rural consumers' purchase of organic and free-range produce: A case study of consumers' from the Island of Arran in Scotland, UK," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 130-139, April.
    13. BAGLIONE, Stephen L. & TUCCI, Louis A. & STANTON, John L., 2019. "Organic Food: Identifying Actionable Segments," Holistic Marketing Management Journal, Holistic Marketing Management, vol. 9(1), pages 10-27, March.
    14. Nur Hasanah, 2017. "Influence of Age and Education on Purchase Intention of Halal Labelled Food Among Indonesian Muslim Mothers," GATR Journals gjbssr490, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    15. Raza, Syed Ali & Shah, Nida & Nisar, Wasay, 2019. "Consumer Buying Behavior of Organic Food with Respect to Health and Safety Concerns among Adolescents," MPRA Paper 93570, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Bin Wang & Jionghua Li & Ao Sun & Yongming Wang & Dianting Wu, 2019. "Residents’ Green Purchasing Intentions in a Developing-Country Context: Integrating PLS-SEM and MGA Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Maria Teresa Cuomo & Pantea Foroudi & Debora Tortora & Shahzeb Hussain & T.C. Melewar, 2019. "Celebrity Endorsement and the Attitude Towards Luxury Brands for Sustainable Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Min Tian & Bo Pu & Yini Chen & Zhian Zhu, 2019. "Consumer’s Waste Classification Intention in China: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. András István Kun & Marietta Kiss, 2021. "On the Mechanics of the Organic Label Effect: How Does Organic Labeling Change Consumer Evaluation of Food Products?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Nguyen Phuong Mai & Vo Nam D., 2023. "Exploring Organic Food Purchase Behaviors of Gen Z: An Application of TPB and MOA Model in a Transition Country," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 35-50, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:11101-:d:651667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.