IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9088-d613927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Sustainable Open Innovations—A Firm-Level Capacity Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Solomon Gyamfi

    (Institute of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, 53210 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

  • Yee Yee Sein

    (Science and Research Centre, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, 53210 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Institutional constraints impede firms’ open innovation. They have been a challenge, obstructing growth and sustainable development. Research on open innovation has shown that the quality of institutions essentially affects innovation in firms. Hence, prior research has made efforts to incorporate the quality of institutions into open innovation analysis. We can use a series of analyses to examine the impact of corruption, the tax system, and other indicators on firm innovation performance. However, developing economies, such as countries in sub-Saharan Africa, represent a specific group of countries that have long been perceived as those mostly deficient in the rule of law, with poor regulatory quality and a great deal of corruption. In these countries, it is also possible to see a lower number of studies, as the inability to obtain quality data to perform empirical analyses can often limit researchers. Nevertheless, employing data from the World Bank’s 2019 Enterprise Survey, this research aimed at exploring the determinants of sustainable open innovation as well as the effect of institutional quality on firms’ capacity utilization and process innovation through a PLS structural equation model analysis. Our research showed interesting findings, such as the fact that the quality of institutions significantly affects firms’ use of OI instruments and capacity utilization. This research also provides for the novelty of the analysis of capacity utilization in an open innovation analysis. The results support the hypotheses that low institutional quality negatively affects firms’ implementation of inbound open innovation instruments, and that there is a strong and positive effect of low institutional quality on firms’ capacity utilization. In addition, we confirm the premise that firms’ implementation of inbound open innovation instruments has a positive and significant influence on firms’ process innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Solomon Gyamfi & Yee Yee Sein, 2021. "Determinants of Sustainable Open Innovations—A Firm-Level Capacity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9088-:d:613927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9088/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9088/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Qi Zhang & Lawrence Loh & Weiwei Wu, 2020. "How do Environmental, Social and Governance Initiatives Affect Innovative Performance for Corporate Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Paunov, Caroline, 2016. "Corruption's asymmetric impacts on firm innovation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 216-231.
    4. Xu, Gang & Yano, Go, 2017. "How does anti-corruption affect corporate innovation? Evidence from recent anti-corruption efforts in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 498-519.
    5. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    6. Mohammed Seid Hussen & Murat Çokgezen, 2021. "The impact of regional institutional quality on firm innovation: evidence from Africa," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 69-90, January.
    7. Philippe Aghion, 2017. "Entrepreneurship and growth: lessons from an intellectual journey," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01599618, HAL.
    8. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zhang, Min, 2020. "The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. José Antonio Alonso & Carlos Garcimartín, 2013. "The Determinants Of Institutional Quality. More On The Debate," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 206-226, March.
    10. Goel, Rajeev K. & Nelson, Michael A., 2021. "Capacity utilization in emerging economy firms: Some new insights related to the role of infrastructure and institutions," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 97-106.
    11. Philippe Aghion, 2017. "Entrepreneurship and growth: lessons from an intellectual journey," Post-Print halshs-01599618, HAL.
    12. Defeng Yang & Aric Xu Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Wei Jiang, 2019. "Environmental Strategy, Institutional Force, and Innovation Capability: A Managerial Cognition Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1147-1161, November.
    13. Barasa, Laura & Knoben, Joris & Vermeulen, Patrick & Kimuyu, Peter & Kinyanjui, Bethuel, 2017. "Institutions, resources and innovation in East Africa: A firm level approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 280-291.
    14. Aziz N. Berdiev & Rajeev K. Goel & James W. Saunoris, 2018. "Corruption and the shadow economy: One‐way or two‐way street?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(11), pages 3221-3241, November.
    15. Michael Breen & Robert Gillanders, 2012. "Corruption, institutions and regulation," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 263-285, September.
    16. Najiba El Amrani El Idrissi & Ilham Zerrouk & Naoual Zerrari & Salvatore Monni, 2020. "Comparative study between two innovative clusters in Morocco and Italy," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(1), pages 400-417, March.
    17. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Chih-Wei & Ho, Shan-Ju, 2020. "Country governance, corruption, and the likelihood of firms’ innovation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 326-338.
    18. Marcel Bogers & Ann-Kristin Zobel & Allan Afuah & Esteve Almirall & Sabine Brunswicker & Linus Dahlander & Lars Frederiksen & Annabelle Gawer & Marc Gruber & Stefan Haefliger & John Hagedoorn & Dennis, 2017. "The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 8-40, January.
    19. Prokop, Viktor & Hajek, Petr & Stejskal, Jan, 2021. "Configuration Paths to Efficient National Innovation Ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Levinthal, Daniel & March, James G., 1981. "A model of adaptive organizational search," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 307-333, December.
    21. Lee, Ryeowon & Lee, Jong-Ho & Garrett, Tony C., 2019. "Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 507-515.
    22. Li-Ying, Jason & Mothe, Caroline & Nguyen, Thi Thuc Uyen, 2018. "Linking forms of inbound open innovation to a driver-based typology of environmental innovation: Evidence from French manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 51-63.
    23. Paola Garrone & Luca Grilli & Boris Mrkajic, 2018. "The role of institutional pressures in the introduction of energy‐efficiency innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1245-1257, December.
    24. Viktor Prokop & Jan Stejskal & Petr Hajek, 2018. "The Influence of Financial Sourcing and Collaboration on Innovative Company Performance: A Comparison of Czech, Slovak, Estonian, Lithuanian, Romanian, Croatian, Slovenian, and Hungarian Case Studies," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Jan Stejskal & Petr Hajek & Oto Hudec (ed.), Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems, pages 219-252, Springer.
    25. Yuna Heo & Fangfang Hou & Seongkyu Gilbert Park, 2021. "Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of investment or innovation? Different effects in advanced and emerging economies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 35-60, January.
    26. Barone, Elisabetta & Ranamagar, Nathan & Solomon, Jill F., 2013. "A Habermasian model of stakeholder (non)engagement and corporate (ir)responsibility reporting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 163-181.
    27. Viktor Prokop & Jan Stejskal & Viktorie Klimova & Vladimir Zitek, 2021. "The role of foreign technologies and R&D in innovation processes within catching-up CEE countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, April.
    28. Baumol, William J., 1993. "Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 197-210, May.
    29. Sheila M. Puffer & Daniel J. McCarthy & Max Boisot, 2010. "Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The Impact of Formal Institutional Voids," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(3), pages 441-467, May.
    30. Steven W. Bradley & Jeffery S. McMullen & Kendall Artz & Edward M. Simiyu, 2012. "Capital Is Not Enough: Innovation in Developing Economies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(4), pages 684-717, June.
    31. Vanessa Casadella & R. Younes Bouacida, 2020. "The Primacy of Innovation Capacities in the NIS of the Maghreb Countries: An Analysis in Terms of Learning Capacity in Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria," Post-Print hal-03680587, HAL.
    32. Dejene Mamo Bekana, 2020. "Does governance quality promote innovation in sub-Saharan Africa? An empirical study across 37 countries," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 21-44, January.
    33. Andreas Buehn & Friedrich Schneider, 2012. "Corruption and the shadow economy: like oil and vinegar, like water and fire?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 19(1), pages 172-194, February.
    34. Joseph LiPuma & Scott Newbert & Jonathan Doh, 2013. "The effect of institutional quality on firm export performance in emerging economies: a contingency model of firm age and size," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 817-841, May.
    35. Joseph Lipuma & Scott L. Newbert & Jonathan P. Doh, 2013. "The effect of institutional quality on firm export performance in emerging economies : a contingency model of firm age and size," Post-Print hal-02312662, HAL.
    36. Tunyi, Abongeh A. & Agyei-Boapeah, Henry & Areneke, Geofry & Agyemang, Jacob, 2019. "Internal capabilities, national governance and performance in African firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 18-37.
    37. Tsai, Kuen-Hung & Wang, Jiann-Chyuan, 2009. "External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 518-526, April.
    38. Ha Thi Thu Le & Quyen Thi Mai Dao & Van-Chien Pham & Duong Thuy Tran, 2019. "Global trend of open innovation research: A bibliometric analysis," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1633808-163, January.
    39. Liu, Xiaoding, 2016. "Corruption culture and corporate misconduct," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 307-327.
    40. Elisabetta Barone & Nathan Ranamagar & Jill F. Solomon, 2013. "A Habermasian model of stakeholder (non)engagement and corporate (ir)responsibility reporting," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 163-181, September.
    41. Kafouros, Mario & Wang, Chengqi & Piperopoulos, Panagiotis & Zhang, Mingshen, 2015. "Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 803-817.
    42. Philippe Aghion, 2017. "Entrepreneurship and growth: lessons from an intellectual journey," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 9-24, January.
    43. Marlen Gabriele Arnold, 2011. "The role of open innovation in strengthening corporate responsibility," International Journal of Sustainable Economy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 361-379.
    44. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Zheng Liu, 2019. "Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    45. Stefan Zeume, 2017. "Bribes and Firm Value," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(5), pages 1457-1489.
    46. Yanmei Zhu & Xinhua Wittmann & Mike Peng, 2012. "Institution-based barriers to innovation in SMEs in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 1131-1142, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stella Lippolis & Angelo Ruggieri & Rossella Leopizzi, 2023. "Open Innovation for sustainable transition: The case of Enel “Open Power”," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4202-4216, November.
    2. Barbara Bigliardi & Serena Filippelli, 2022. "Sustainability and Open Innovation: Main Themes and Research Trajectories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Adams, Kweku & Attah-Boakye, Rexford & Yu, Honglan & Johansson, Jeaneth & Njoya, Eric Tchouamou, 2023. "Female board representation and coupled open innovation: Evidence from emerging market multinational enterprises," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristian Barra & Nazzareno Ruggiero, 2023. "Quality of Government and Types of Innovation—Empirical Evidence for Italian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1749-1789, June.
    2. Alfredo Monte & Sara Moccia & Luca Pennacchio, 2022. "Regional entrepreneurship and innovation: historical roots and the impact on the growth of regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 451-473, January.
    3. Hameeda A. AlMalki & Christopher M. Durugbo, 2023. "Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 731-785, June.
    4. Zoltan J. Acs & Saul Estrin & Tomasz Mickiewicz & László Szerb, 2018. "Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 501-514, August.
    5. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zhang, Min, 2020. "The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Javier Changoluisa & Michael Fritsch, 2020. "New Business Formation and Incumbents’ Perception of Competitive Pressure," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 56(1), pages 165-197, February.
    7. Maribel Guerrero & Francisco Liñán & F. Rafael Cáceres-Carrasco, 2021. "The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: a comparison across developed and developing economies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1733-1759, December.
    8. Jonathan Munemo, 2018. "Entrepreneurial Success in Africa: How Relevant Are Foreign Direct Investment and Financial Development?," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 30(4), pages 372-385, December.
    9. Philippe Aghion & Céline Antonin, 2018. "Technical Progress and Growth since the Crisis," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(3), pages 55-68.
    10. Galindo-Martín, Miguel-Ángel & Castaño-Martínez, María-Soledad & Méndez-Picazo, María-Teresa, 2021. "Effects of the pandemic crisis on entrepreneurship and sustainable development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 345-353.
    11. Fiona Sussan & Zoltan J. Acs, 2017. "The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 55-73, June.
    12. Polemis, Michael L. & Stengos, Thanasis, 2020. "The impact of regulatory quality on business venturing: A semi-parametric approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 29-36.
    13. Mike Herrington & Alicia Coduras, 2019. "The national entrepreneurship framework conditions in sub-Saharan Africa: a comparative study of GEM data/National Expert Surveys for South Africa, Angola, Mozambique and Madagascar," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Steff De Visscher & Markus Eberhardt & Gerdie Everaert, 2017. "Measuring productivity and absorptive capacity evolution," Discussion Papers 2017-11, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    15. Dokas, Ioannis & Panagiotidis, Minas & Papadamou, Stephanos & Spyromitros, Eleftherios, 2023. "Does innovation affect the impact of corruption on economic growth? International evidence," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1030-1054.
    16. Eberhardt, Markus & Everaert, Gerdie & De Visscher, Stef, 2017. "Measuring Productivity and Absorptive Capacity Evolution in OECD Economies," CEPR Discussion Papers 12261, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Michele Cincera & Ela Ince & Anabela Marques Santos, 2019. "Competition and Innovation: Evidence from Worldwide Corporate R&D Spenders," Working Papers TIMES² 2019-33, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    18. Gupta, Brij B. & Gaurav, Akshat & Panigrahi, Prabin Kumar & Arya, Varsha, 2023. "Analysis of artificial intelligence-based technologies and approaches on sustainable entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    19. Óscar Afonso, 2022. "Growth and wage effects of the monetary policy," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4058-4084, October.
    20. Jian, Jianhui & Fan, Xiaojie & Zhao, Shiyong & Zhou, Dong, 2021. "Business creation, innovation, and economic growth: Evidence from China’s economic transition, 1978–2017," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 371-378.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9088-:d:613927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.