IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v6y2019i1p1633808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global trend of open innovation research: A bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ha Thi Thu Le
  • Quyen Thi Mai Dao
  • Van-Chien Pham
  • Duong Thuy Tran

Abstract

A bibliometric approach was conducted to evaluate the global scientific outputs of open innovation based on literature in Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) database from 2003 to 2017, with the ultimate goal of assisting researchers to fulfil the potentiality of open innovation research and to establish future directions. Overall, 1,046 articles in 318 journals were analysed by research performance of countries, continents and institutes, authorship, journals, most cited articles, first articles, author-keywords, keywords plus and paper titles to identify relevant trends in this period. This study demonstrates that Europe was the most productive continent featured by Italy’s remarkable surge by 150% in total articles between 2016 and 2017. However, with respect to research performance by country, the USA came top with the highest total number of articles. The analysis of keywords groups in this study shows that while intangible assets were given decreasing attention, issues pertaining to business performance, firm openness and innovation capacity became foci in open innovation research. Articles were published by top journals which all featured the “management” field in their subject categories, indicating that open innovation spectrum was mainly explored in the field of management.

Suggested Citation

  • Ha Thi Thu Le & Quyen Thi Mai Dao & Van-Chien Pham & Duong Thuy Tran, 2019. "Global trend of open innovation research: A bibliometric analysis," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1633808-163, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:1633808
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2019.1633808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2019.1633808
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2019.1633808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ho, Manh-Toan, 2020. "The rise of research on development economics in Vietnam: Analyses and implications for the public and policymakers from SSHPA 2008-2020 dataset," Thesis Commons msy6e, Center for Open Science.
    2. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Khodayari, Maryam & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Shahabaldini parizi, Zahra & Shahriari, Elmira, 2022. "Sharing Your Assets: A Holistic Review of Sharing Economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 604-625.
    3. , Aisdl, 2020. "The rise of research on development economics in Vietnam: Analyses and implications for the public and policymakers from SSHPA 2008-2020 dataset," OSF Preprints 9nbyr, Center for Open Science.
    4. Vuong Quan Hoang & La Viet Phuong & Vuong Thu Trang & Hoang Phuong Hanh & Ho Manh Toan & Ho Manh Tung & Nguyen Hong Kong To, 2020. "Multi-faceted insights of entrepreneurship facing a fast-growing economy: A literature review," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 25-41, January.
    5. Solomon Gyamfi & Yee Yee Sein, 2021. "Determinants of Sustainable Open Innovations—A Firm-Level Capacity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Belén Payán-Sánchez & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Diego Vazquez-Brust & Natalia Yakovleva & Miguel Pérez-Valls, 2021. "Open Innovation for Sustainability or Not: Literature Reviews of Global Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:1633808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.