IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8592-d606681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Attitudes and Willingness to Purchase Online—Classification Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Gąsior

    (Department of Marketing, Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, ul. Nadbystrzycka 38D, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

During the last several years, a tremendous increase in the popularity of online shopping has been observed. There are several possible reasons behind it, some of them, like competitive pricing, convenience or low cost of information search, considered to be extrinsic, others—like ease of use of this channel, pleasure related to it or willingness to reduce social interactions—intrinsic. The purpose of this research is to evaluate another factor, i.e., consumers’ environmental attitudes, in the perspective of their possible relation with the perception and willingness to use online and conventional shopping channels. In order to achieve this, a self-reporting questionnaire was developed and the data from a representative sample of 1000 Polish Internet users was gathered. The research procedure included cluster analysis, whose objective was to identify groups of customers with similar composition of environmental attitudes and next, a set of Kruskal–Wallis tests, aimed at identifying differences in opinions on channels between these clusters. The research proved that large groups of consumers with consistent sets of environmental attitudes exist and the scope of differences between such clusters is not reduced to a unidimensional, “positive–negative” continuum. Furthermore, there are significant differences between clusters in the declared willingness to use online and conventional shopping channels—groups more environmentally-oriented are more willing to purchase online and trust online shops, although they neither perceive conventional retail in a more negative way nor directly prefer online over conventional channels. The nature of such a phenomenon is open to explanation and interpretation, nevertheless, the research proves that environmental attitudes should be included in future models of consumers’ channel choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Gąsior, 2021. "Environmental Attitudes and Willingness to Purchase Online—Classification Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8592-:d:606681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Swapan Kumar Saha & Paulo Duarte & Susana C. Silva & Guijun Zhuang, 2021. "Supporting sustainability by promoting online purchase through enhancement of online convenience," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7251-7272, May.
    2. John Horn, 1965. "A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 30(2), pages 179-185, June.
    3. Maxwell, Sarah, 2002. "Rule-based price fairness and its effect on willingness to purchase," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 191-212, April.
    4. Lu, Qiang (Steven) & Pattnaik, Chinmay & Xiao, Junji & Voola, Ranjit, 2018. "Cross-national variation in consumers' retail channel selection in a multichannel environment: Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 321-332.
    5. Poushneh, Atieh & Vasquez-Parraga, Arturo Z., 2017. "Discernible impact of augmented reality on retail customer's experience, satisfaction and willingness to buy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 229-234.
    6. Prateek Kalia, 2017. "Does Demographics Affect Purchase Frequency in Online Retail?," International Journal of Online Marketing (IJOM), IGI Global, vol. 7(2), pages 42-56, April.
    7. Gianni Cicia & Marilena Furno & Teresa Giudice, 2021. "Do consumers’ values and attitudes affect food retailer choice? Evidence from a national survey on farmers’ market in Germany," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Lawrence Hamilton, 2011. "Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 231-242, January.
    9. Niu, Baozhuang & Mu, Zihao & Li, Baixun, 2019. "O2O results in traffic congestion reduction and sustainability improvement: Analysis of “Online-to-Store” channel and uniform pricing strategy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 481-505.
    10. Farid Huseynov & Sevgi Özkan Yıldırım, 2019. "Online Consumer Typologies and Their Shopping Behaviors in B2C E-Commerce Platforms," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, May.
    11. Alexander Rossolov & Halyna Rossolova & José Holguín-Veras, 2021. "Online and in-store purchase behavior: shopping channel choice in a developing economy," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3143-3179, December.
    12. Martinsson, Johan & Lundqvist, Lennart J. & Sundström, Aksel, 2011. "Energy saving in Swedish households. The (relative) importance of environmental attitudes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5182-5191, September.
    13. Spangenberg, Eric R. & Sprott, David E. & Grohmann, Bianca & Tracy, Daniel L., 2006. "Gender-congruent ambient scent influences on approach and avoidance behaviors in a retail store," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(12), pages 1281-1287, November.
    14. Roland Hischier, 2018. "Car vs. Packaging—A First, Simple (Environmental) Sustainability Assessment of Our Changing Shopping Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, August.
    15. Joonas Rokka & Liisa Uusitalo, 2008. "Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices : Do consumers care?," Post-Print hal-02313351, HAL.
    16. Lukasz Skowron & Monika Sak-Skowron, 2021. "Environmental Sensitivity and Awareness as Differentiating Factors in the Purchase Decision-Making Process in the Smartphone Industry—Case of Polish Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Hongmei Zhang & Yubo Zou & Will Terry & Wilfried Karmaus & Hasan Arshad, 2019. "Joint Clustering With Correlated Variables," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(3), pages 296-306, July.
    18. Cervellon, Marie-Cécile & Sylvie, Jean & Ngobo, Paul-Valentin, 2015. "Shopping orientations as antecedents to channel choice in the French grocery multichannel landscape," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 31-51.
    19. Stöckigt, Gerrit & Schiebener, Johannes & Brand, Matthias, 2018. "Providing sustainability information in shopping situations contributes to sustainable decision making: An empirical study with choice-based conjoint analyses," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 188-199.
    20. Konuş, Umut & Verhoef, Peter C. & Neslin, Scott A., 2008. "Multichannel Shopper Segments and Their Covariates," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(4), pages 398-413.
    21. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    22. Keen, Cherie & Wetzels, Martin & de Ruyter, Ko & Feinberg, Richard, 2004. "E-tailers versus retailers: Which factors determine consumer preferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(7), pages 685-695, July.
    23. Charrad, Malika & Ghazzali, Nadia & Boiteau, Véronique & Niknafs, Azam, 2014. "NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 61(i06).
    24. Marie-Cécile Cervellon & Jean Sylvie & Paul Valentin Ngobo, 2015. "Shopping orientations as antecedents to channel choice in the French grocery multichannel landscape," Post-Print hal-01619879, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Barann & Jan H. Betzing & Marco Niemann & Benedikt Hoffmeister & Jörg Becker, 2022. "Exploring customers’ likeliness to use e-service touchpoints in brick and mortar retail," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 523-545, June.
    2. Hallikainen, Heli & Alamäki, Ari & Laukkanen, Tommi, 2019. "Individual preferences of digital touchpoints: A latent class analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 386-393.
    3. Miquel-Romero, Maria-Jose & Frasquet, Marta & Molla-Descals, Alejandro, 2020. "The role of the store in managing postpurchase complaints for omnichannel shoppers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 288-296.
    4. Homburg, Christian & Lauer, Karin & Vomberg, Arnd, 2019. "The multichannel pricing dilemma: Do consumers accept higher offline than online prices?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 597-612.
    5. Neslin, Scott A., 2022. "The omnichannel continuum: Integrating online and offline channels along the customer journey," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 111-132.
    6. Salmani, Yasamin & Partovi, Fariborz Y., 2021. "Channel-level resource allocation decision in multichannel retailing: A U.S. multichannel company application," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Lea Sonderegger-Wakolbinger & Christian Stummer, 2015. "An agent-based simulation of customer multi-channel choice behavior," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(2), pages 459-477, June.
    8. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. Herhausen, Dennis & Kleinlercher, Kristina & Verhoef, Peter C. & Emrich, Oliver & Rudolph, Thomas, 2019. "Loyalty Formation for Different Customer Journey Segments," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 9-29.
    10. Arnaud Riviere & Rémi Mencarelli & Bertrand Belvaux & Jessie Pallud, 2016. "Channel proliferation and perceived value of the digital offer in the newspaper industry: a complementary effect? [Multiplication des canaux et valeur perçue de l’offre digitale dans la presse écri," Post-Print hal-01591784, HAL.
    11. Mortimer, Gary & Weeks, Clinton S., 2019. "How unit price awareness and usage encourages grocery brand switching and expenditure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 346-356.
    12. Flavián, Carlos & Gurrea, Raquel & Orús, Carlos, 2020. "Combining channels to make smart purchases: The role of webrooming and showrooming," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Mariantonietta Fiore & Antonino Galati, 2020. "How the Covid-19 Pandemic Is Changing Online Food Shopping Human Behaviour in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Taneja, Shilpa & Ali, Liaqat, 2021. "Determinants of customers’ intentions towards environmentally sustainable banking: Testing the structural model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Lombardi, Alessia & Carfora, Valentina & Cicia, Gianni & Del Giudice, Teresa & Lombardi, Pasquale & Panico, Teresa, 2017. "Exploring Willingness to Pay for QR Code Labeled Extra-Virgin Olive Oil: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Hai Tran, Van & Sirieix, Lucie, 2020. "Shopping and cross-shopping practices in Hanoi Vietnam: An emerging urban market context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    17. Raya Muttarak & Thanyaporn Chankrajang, 2015. "Who is concerned about and takes action on climate change? Gender and education divides among Thais," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 13(1), pages 193-220.
    18. Mookherjee, Satadruta & Lee, Jennifer J. & Sung, Billy, 2021. "Multichannel presence, boon or curse?: A comparison in price, loyalty, regret, and disappointment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 429-440.
    19. Schneider, Patricia J. & Zielke, Stephan, 2021. "Price versus service: Can retailers beat showrooming with competence?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    20. Valerie Graf-Drasch & Maximilian Röglinger & Annette Wenninger & Sabiölla Hosseini, 2022. "A Contextualized Acceptance Model for Proactive Smart Services," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 345-387, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8592-:d:606681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.