IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7762-d592796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Impact of Soil Compaction on the Environment and Agricultural Economic Losses in Lithuania and Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Andrii Zabrodskyi

    (Agriculture Academy, Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Safety, Vytautas Magnus University, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Egidijus Šarauskis

    (Agriculture Academy, Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Safety, Vytautas Magnus University, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Savelii Kukharets

    (Department of Mechanical and Engineering Agroecosystems, Polissia National University, 10002 Zhytomyr, Ukraine)

  • Antanas Juostas

    (Agriculture Academy, Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Safety, Vytautas Magnus University, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Gediminas Vasiliauskas

    (Agriculture Academy, Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Safety, Vytautas Magnus University, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Albinas Andriušis

    (Agriculture Academy, Institute of Power and Transport Machinery Engineering, Vytautas Magnus University, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

Soil compaction (SC) is one of the most damaging degradation processes. The effects of compaction are closely related to crop losses and GHG emissions due to additional fuel use. It is therefore important not only to correctly monitor the condition of the soil and the restoration of damaged soil but also to understand the costs of excessive exploitation of soil and individual risks in different countries and continents. A model of equations has been developed to assess the effects of compaction that can be used on a national or even single farm scale. However, for its further application, more data should be collected. Based on the data available in the public domain, the damage caused by compaction was compared between Ukrainian (UA) and Lithuanian (LT) scenarios as these countries have a similar situation but different levels of soil resource management. Soil characteristics, such as soil types and predisposition to compaction, depending on its type, were assessed in both countries. The main parameters used to estimate the damage due to SC were: yield loss; additional fuel consumption; losses of N, P, K fertilizers, water pollution, and flooding; erosion; and GHG emissions. The results reveal potential annual losses due to compaction of around EUR 27 million for Lithuania and around EUR 1.6 billion for Ukraine. Expected potential average losses per hectare of arable land are about EUR 49 ha −1 y −1 for Ukraine (33.9 million ha or 56.76% of the total area) and about EUR 13 ha −1 y −1 for Lithuania (2.11 million ha or 33.77%). Potential crop losses are one of the costliest consequences of compaction. They could cost about EUR 1 billion annually for Ukraine and about EUR 10.7 million for Lithuania. Moreover, the additional use of fuel and the associated GHG emissions can probably take away EUR 180 million (UA) and about EUR 4 million (LT) each year.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrii Zabrodskyi & Egidijus Šarauskis & Savelii Kukharets & Antanas Juostas & Gediminas Vasiliauskas & Albinas Andriušis, 2021. "Analysis of the Impact of Soil Compaction on the Environment and Agricultural Economic Losses in Lithuania and Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7762-:d:592796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7762/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7762/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sartori, Martina & Philippidis, George & Ferrari, Emanuele & Borrelli, Pasquale & Lugato, Emanuele & Montanarella, Luca & Panagos, Panos, 2019. "A linkage between the biophysical and the economic: Assessing the global market impacts of soil erosion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 299-312.
    2. David Pimentel, 2006. "Soil Erosion: A Food and Environmental Threat," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 119-137, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Augusto Mussi Alvim & Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet, 2021. "Climate Change Policies and the Carbon Tax Effect on Meat and Dairy Industries in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Chetan Badgujar & Sanjoy Das & Dania Martinez Figueroa & Daniel Flippo, 2023. "Application of Computational Intelligence Methods in Agricultural Soil–Machine Interaction: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-39, January.
    3. Luis Eduardo Akiyoshi Sanches Suzuki & Dalvan José Reinert & Marlene Cristina Alves & José Miguel Reichert, 2022. "Medium-Term No-Tillage, Additional Compaction, and Chiseling as Affecting Clayey Subtropical Soil Physical Properties and Yield of Corn, Soybean and Wheat Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Sirichai Pattanawanidchai & Pongdhorn Sae-Oui & Thipjak Na-Lumpang & Surapich Loykulnant & Thirapong Kuankhamnuan, 2023. "Reduction in Soil Compaction by Utilization of Waste Tire Rubber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen, Xiaojie & Yao, Shunbo & Sauer, Johannes, 2022. "Shadow prices and abatement cost of soil erosion in Shaanxi Province, China: Convex expectile regression approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Semih Ediş & Özgür Burhan Timur & Gamze Tuttu & İbrahim Aytaş & Ceyhun Göl & Ali Uğur Özcan, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Engineering Measures and Vegetation Restoration on Soil Erosion: A Case Study in Osmancık, Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Panos Panagos & Pasquale Borrelli & David Robinson, 2020. "FAO calls for actions to reduce global soil erosion," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 789-790, May.
    4. Aznarul Islam & Sanat Kumar Guchhait, 2017. "Search for social justice for the victims of erosion hazard along the banks of river Bhagirathi by hydraulic control: a case study of West Bengal, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 433-459, April.
    5. Václav BRANT & Milan KROULÍK & Jan PIVEC & Petr ZÁBRANSKÝ & Josef HAKL & Josef HOLEC & Zdeněk KVÍZ & Luděk PROCHÁZKA, 2017. "Splash erosion in maize crops under conservation management in combination with shallow strip-tillage before sowing," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 106-116.
    6. López-Vicente, M. & Navas, A. & Gaspar, L. & Machín, J., 2013. "Advanced modelling of runoff and soil redistribution for agricultural systems: The SERT model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-12.
    7. David Oscar Yawson & Michael Osei Adu & Benjamin Ason & Frederick Ato Armah & Genesis Tambang Yengoh, 2016. "Putting Soil Security on the Policy Agenda: Need for a Familiar Framework," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Aditi Sengupta & Priyanka Kushwaha & Antonia Jim & Peter A. Troch & Raina Maier, 2020. "New Soil, Old Plants, and Ubiquitous Microbes: Evaluating the Potential of Incipient Basaltic Soil to Support Native Plant Growth and Influence Belowground Soil Microbial Community Composition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Caterina Samela & Vito Imbrenda & Rosa Coluzzi & Letizia Pace & Tiziana Simoniello & Maria Lanfredi, 2022. "Multi-Decadal Assessment of Soil Loss in a Mediterranean Region Characterized by Contrasting Local Climates," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Sacchi, Laura Valeria & Powell, Priscila Ana & Gasparri, Nestor Ignacio & Grau, Ricardo, 2017. "Air quality loss in urban centers of the Argentinean Dry Chaco: Wind and dust control as two scientifically neglected ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 234-240.
    11. Václav BRANT & Petr ZÁBRANSKÝ & Michaela ŠKEŘÍKOVÁ & Jan PIVEC & Milan KROULÍK & Luděk PROCHÁZKA, 2017. "Effect of row width on splash erosion and throughfall in silage maize crops," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 12(1), pages 39-50.
    12. Nepal, Sandhya & Tran, Liem T., 2019. "Identifying trade-offs between socio-economic and environmental factors for bioenergy crop production: A case study from northern Kentucky," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 272-283.
    13. Nuaman Ejaz & Mohamed Elhag & Jarbou Bahrawi & Lifu Zhang & Hamza Farooq Gabriel & Khalil Ur Rahman, 2023. "Soil Erosion Modelling and Accumulation Using RUSLE and Remote Sensing Techniques: Case Study Wadi Baysh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Shanshan Xu & Qinghe Zhao & Shengyan Ding & Mingzhou Qin & Lixin Ning & Xiaoyu Ji, 2018. "Improving Soil and Water Conservation of Riparian Vegetation Based on Landscape Leakiness and Optimal Vegetation Pattern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Michele A. Whitecraft & Bruce E. Huggins Jr., 2013. "Casting a Wider Net: Understanding the “Root” Causes of Human-Induced Soil Erosion," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-16, September.
    16. A. S. Strokov & V. S. Krasilnikova & O. V. Cherkasova, 2022. "Economic Valuation of Recovery and Increased Efficiency in Agricultural Land Use," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 447-454, August.
    17. Hoekman, S. Kent & Broch, Amber & Liu, Xiaowei (Vivian), 2018. "Environmental implications of higher ethanol production and use in the U.S.: A literature review. Part I – Impacts on water, soil, and air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3140-3158.
    18. Magdalena Raftowicz & Krzysztof Solarz & Agnieszka Dradrach, 2024. "Short Food Supply Chains as a Practical Implication of Sustainable Development Ideas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Marianne Bechmann & Inga Greipsland & Anne Falk Øgaard, 2019. "Implementation of Mitigation Measures to Reduce Phosphorus Losses: The Vestre Vansjø Pilot Catchment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Qin Liu & Tiange Shi, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation and the Factors of Ecological Vulnerability in the Toutun River Basin Based on Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7762-:d:592796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.