IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6950-d578659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Rice Husk Power Plants Based on Clean Development Mechanism: A Case Study in Mekong River Delta, Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Van Song

    (Faculty of Economics and Rural Development, Vietnam National University of Agriculture (VNUA), Ha Noi 10000, Vietnam)

  • Thai Van Ha

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Ha Noi University of Business and Technology (HUBT), Ha Noi 10000, Vietnam)

  • Tran Duc Thuan

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration, Dong Nai Technology University (DNTU), Dong Nai 76000, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Van Hanh

    (Institute of Energy of Viet Nam (IEVN), Ton That Tung, Dong Da, Ha Noi 10000, Vietnam)

  • Dinh Van Tien

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Ha Noi University of Business and Technology (HUBT), Ha Noi 10000, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Cong Tiep

    (Faculty of Economics and Rural Development, Vietnam National University of Agriculture (VNUA), Ha Noi 10000, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Thi Minh Phuong

    (Faculty of Economics, Vinh University (VU), Nghe An 43000, Vietnam)

  • Phan Anh Tu

    (International Business Department, School of Economics, Can Tho University, Can Tho 94000, Vietnam)

  • Tran Ba Uan

    (Faculty of Economic and Finance, Dien Bien Technical Economic College, Dien Bien 32000, Vietnam)

Abstract

In this research, we planned and conducted estimations for developing a pilot-scale Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project for group plant activities in the Vietnam electricity/energy sector. The overall aim of this paper is to assess the power generation potential of rice husk power plants in the Mekong Delta. We intend to set up a rice husk energy balance flowchart for the whole Mekong River Delta in the year 2021 and suggest policies that can be used for the power generation of unused rice husk, to avoid having them pollute rivers and canals. We put forward a safe and environmentally friendly solution to thoroughly minimize the current serious pollution of rivers and canals in the Mekong River Delta caused by the increasing quantity of unused rice husk. The results of this paper are based on the estimation of electricity potential of a group of rice husk power development plants in the Mekong River Delta with a capacity of 11 MW per plant, including carbon dioxide emission reductions (CERs) and CER credits, along with estimations of their economic criteria (NPV, B/C, IRR), both W/CDM and W/O CDM.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Van Song & Thai Van Ha & Tran Duc Thuan & Nguyen Van Hanh & Dinh Van Tien & Nguyen Cong Tiep & Nguyen Thi Minh Phuong & Phan Anh Tu & Tran Ba Uan, 2021. "Development of Rice Husk Power Plants Based on Clean Development Mechanism: A Case Study in Mekong River Delta, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-10, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6950-:d:578659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6950/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6950/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Jaswinder, 2015. "Overview of electric power potential of surplus agricultural biomass from economic, social, environmental and technical perspective—A case study of Punjab," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 286-297.
    2. Jirasak Ji & Narameth Nananukul, 2019. "Supply chain for sustainable renewable energy from biomass," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(4), pages 568-590.
    3. Visser, Henning & Thopil, George Alex & Brent, Alan, 2019. "Life cycle cost profitability of biomass power plants in South Africa within the international context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 9-21.
    4. Anabela Botelho & Lina Lourenço-Gomes & Lígia Pinto & Sara Sousa & Marieta Valente, 2016. "Using stated preference methods to assess environmental impacts of forest biomass power plants in Portugal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 1323-1337, October.
    5. Kinoshita, Tsuguki & Ohki, Takashi & Yamagata, Yoshiki, 2010. "Woody biomass supply potential for thermal power plants in Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(9), pages 2923-2927, September.
    6. Prasertsan, S. & Sajjakulnukit, B., 2006. "Biomass and biogas energy in Thailand: Potential, opportunity and barriers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 599-610.
    7. Yang, Bo & Wei, Yi-Ming & Hou, Yunbing & Li, Hui & Wang, Pengtao, 2019. "Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Singh, Jaswinder, 2016. "A roadmap for production of sustainable, consistent and reliable electric power from agricultural biomass- An Indian perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 246-254.
    9. Christian Moretti & Blanca Corona & Viola Rühlin & Thomas Götz & Martin Junginger & Thomas Brunner & Ingwald Obernberger & Li Shen, 2020. "Combining Biomass Gasification and Solid Oxid Fuel Cell for Heat and Power Generation: An Early-Stage Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, June.
    10. Luk, Ho Ting & Lam, Tsz Ying Gene & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Gebreegziabher, Tesfaldet & Hui, Chi Wai, 2013. "Drying of biomass for power generation: A case study on power generation from empty fruit bunch," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 205-215.
    11. Tokarski, Stanisław & Głód, Krzysztof & Ściążko, Marek & Zuwała, Jarosław, 2015. "Comparative assessment of the energy effects of biomass combustion and co-firing in selected technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P1), pages 24-32.
    12. Reeko Watanabe & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2020. "The Development of Straw-Based Biomass Power Generation in Rural Area in Northeast China—An Institutional Analysis Grounded in a Risk Management Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1, March.
    13. Weldekidan, Haftom & Strezov, Vladimir & Li, Rui & Kan, Tao & Town, Graham & Kumar, Ravinder & He, Jing & Flamant, Gilles, 2020. "Distribution of solar pyrolysis products and product gas composition produced from agricultural residues and animal wastes at different operating parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1102-1109.
    14. Mohamed, Usama & Zhao, Yingjie & Huang, Yi & Cui, Yang & Shi, Lijuan & Li, Congming & Pourkashanian, Mohamed & Wei, Guoqiang & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2020. "Sustainability evaluation of biomass direct gasification using chemical looping technology for power generation with and w/o CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    15. Zhang, Xingping & Luo, Kaiyan & Tan, Qinliang, 2016. "A feedstock supply model integrating the official organization for China's biomass generation plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 276-290.
    16. Ferreira, Sérgio & Monteiro, Eliseu & Brito, Paulo & Vilarinho, Cândida, 2017. "Biomass resources in Portugal: Current status and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1221-1235.
    17. Roy, Dibyendu & Samanta, Samiran & Ghosh, Sudip, 2020. "Performance assessment of a biomass fuelled advanced hybrid power generation system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 639-661.
    18. Beagle, E. & Belmont, E., 2016. "Technoeconomic assessment of beetle kill biomass co-firing in existing coal fired power plants in the Western United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 429-438.
    19. Gao, Cheng-kang & Na, Hong-ming & Song, Kai-hui & Dyer, Noel & Tian, Fan & Xu, Qing-jiang & Xing, Yu-hong, 2019. "Environmental impact analysis of power generation from biomass and wind farms in different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 307-317.
    20. Thakur, Amit & Canter, Christina E. & Kumar, Amit, 2014. "Life-cycle energy and emission analysis of power generation from forest biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 246-253.
    21. Penwadee Cheewaphongphan & Agapol Junpen & Orachorn Kamnoet & Savitri Garivait, 2018. "Study on the Potential of Rice Straws as a Supplementary Fuel in Very Small Power Plants in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    22. Jasiulewicz, Michał, 2019. "The Possibilities Of Meeting Energy Demands In System Thermal Power Plants By Using Local Solid Biomass," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2019(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Truong, An Ha & Ha-Duong, Minh & Tran, Hoang Anh, 2022. "Economics of co-firing rice straw in coal power plants in Vietnam," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Zhang, Xiaoyue & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Li, Kailong, 2022. "Development of a stochastic multistage lifecycle programming model for electric power system planning – A case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Kaiyan Luo & Xingping Zhang & Qinliang Tan, 2018. "A Co-Opetition Straw Supply Strategy Integrating Rural Official Organizations and Farmers’ Behavior in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Kang, Yating & Yang, Qing & Bartocci, Pietro & Wei, Hongjian & Liu, Sylvia Shuhan & Wu, Zhujuan & Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Haiping & Fantozzi, Francesco & Chen, Hanping, 2020. "Bioenergy in China: Evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Yana, Syaifuddin & Nizar, Muhammad & Irhamni, & Mulyati, Dewi, 2022. "Biomass waste as a renewable energy in developing bio-based economies in Indonesia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Azevedo, Susana Garrido & Sequeira, Tiago & Santos, Marcelo & Mendes, Luis, 2019. "Biomass-related sustainability: A review of the literature and interpretive structural modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1107-1125.
    7. Aviso, K.B. & Sy, C.L. & Tan, R.R. & Ubando, A.T., 2020. "Fuzzy optimization of carbon management networks based on direct and indirect biomass co-firing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Mohamed, Usama & Zhao, Ying-jie & Yi, Qun & Shi, Li-juan & Wei, Guo-qing & Nimmo, William, 2021. "Evaluation of life cycle energy, economy and CO2 emissions for biomass chemical looping gasification to power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 366-387.
    9. Tumen Ozdil, N.F. & Caliskan, M., 2022. "Energy potential from biomass from agricultural crops: Development prospects of the Turkish bioeconomy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    10. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    11. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    12. Al-Jabri, Hareb & Das, Probir & Khan, Shoyeb & AbdulQuadir, Mohammad & Thaher, Mehmoud Ibrahim & Hoekman, Kent & Hawari, Alaa H., 2022. "A comparison of bio-crude oil production from five marine microalgae – Using life cycle analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    13. Christian Moretti & Blanca Corona & Robert Edwards & Martin Junginger & Alberto Moro & Matteo Rocco & Li Shen, 2020. "Reviewing ISO Compliant Multifunctionality Practices in Environmental Life Cycle Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Yang, Lin & Lv, Haodong & Jiang, Dalin & Fan, Jingli & Zhang, Xian & He, Weijun & Zhou, Jinsheng & Wu, Wenjing, 2020. "Whether CCS technologies will exacerbate the water crisis in China? —A full life-cycle analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Przemysław Motyl & Danuta Król & Sławomir Poskrobko & Marek Juszczak, 2020. "Numerical Modelling and Experimental Verification of the Low-Emission Biomass Combustion Process in a Domestic Boiler with Flue Gas Flow around the Combustion Chamber," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Maw Maw Tun & Dagmar Juchelková, 2019. "Biomass Sources and Energy Potential for Energy Sector in Myanmar: An Outlook," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Daabo, Ahmed M. & Saeed, Liqaa I. & Altamer, Marwa H. & Fadhil, Abdelrahman B. & Badawy, Tawfik, 2022. "The production of bio-based fuels and carbon catalysts from chicken waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 21-34.
    18. Baharoon, Dhyia Aidroos & Rahman, Hasimah Abdul & Fadhl, Saeed Obaid, 2016. "Publics׳ knowledge, attitudes and behavioral toward the use of solar energy in Yemen power sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 498-515.
    19. Changbo Wang & Lixiao Zhang & Shuying Yang & Mingyue Pang, 2012. "A Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Nonrenewable Energy and Greenhouse-Gas Emissions of a Village-Level Biomass Gasification Project in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Luís Calado & Valter Silva & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6950-:d:578659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.