IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p106-d467662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forensics at the Port: Can Diagnostic Testing Benefit Trade?

Author

Listed:
  • Savannah W. Gleim

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada)

  • Richard S. Gray

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada)

  • Stuart J. Smyth

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada)

Abstract

A growing pool of genomic knowledge and remarkable reductions in the cost of genetic sequencing is revolutionizing the identification of plant pathogens and phytosanitary risks. This article examines available technologies of plant testing for genetics, residues, and contamination that can be imposed at port locations for the trade of bulk commodity crops. Access and deployment of lower-cost detection technologies could fundamentally change phytosanitary practices with potential consequences for agricultural trade. Investment in testing for the presence of transgenic dockage or plant and soil diseases will likely decrease time and arbitration costs. Implementation of diagnostics testing could not only protect the exporters’ position, but it could also lead to future implications of trusted trade or higher standards of phytosanitary policy. The lack of rigorous export testing creates the opportunity for trade protectionist countries to claim that commodity imports fail to meet import standards, which can either lower the price or result in shipment rejection. The failure of commodity shipments to comply with import thresholds is a regular occurrence, yet resolutions are achieved that do not disrupt international trade. This rise in the ability to accurately test for pathogen detection provides the opportunity for safer commodity trade, but also the rise in protectionism.

Suggested Citation

  • Savannah W. Gleim & Richard S. Gray & Stuart J. Smyth, 2020. "Forensics at the Port: Can Diagnostic Testing Benefit Trade?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:106-:d:467662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerr, William A., 2004. "Sanitary Barriers And International Trade Governance Issues For The Nafta Beef Market," Proceedings of the 8th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2002: Keeping the Borders Open 16918, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    2. Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes & Peter W.B. Phillips & Justus Wesseler & Stuart J. Smyth (ed.), 2016. "The Coexistence of Genetically Modified, Organic and Conventional Foods," Natural Resource Management and Policy, Springer, number 978-1-4939-3727-1, December.
    3. Unknown, 2004. "Keeping the Borders Open," Proceedings of the 8th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2002: Keeping the Borders Open 252449, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    4. Houtian Ge & James Nolan & Richard Gray, 2015. "Identifying Strategies to Mitigate Handling Risks in the Canadian Grain Supply Chain," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(1), pages 101-128, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rozalia Kicsi & Aurel Burciu & Simona Buta & Ionel Bostan & Pavel Stanciu, 2023. "Insights into the Political Economy of Protection: The Case of International Trade in Agricultural Goods," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(4), pages 447-472.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nakuja, Tekuni & Kerr, William A., 2013. "Was Food Safety Declining?: Assessing the Justification for the US Food Safety Modernisation Act," Commissioned Papers 145969, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    2. Kerr, William A., 2009. "Political Precaution, Pandemics and Protectionism," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14.
    3. Viju, Crina & Yeung, May T. & Kerr, William A., 2011. "Post-Moratorium EU Regulation of Genetically Modified Products: Trade Concerns," Commissioned Papers 116848, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    4. Kerr, William A. & Loppacher, Laura J. & Hobbs, Jill E., 2007. "International Standards for Regulating Trade When BSE Is Present: Why Are They Being Ignored?," CAFRI: Current Agriculture, Food and Resource Issues, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society, issue 8, pages 1-15, January.
    5. Vincent Smith & Justus H. H. Wesseler & David Zilberman, 2021. "New Plant Breeding Technologies: An Assessment of the Political Economy of the Regulatory Environment and Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Thomas Vempiliyath & Maitri Thakur & Vincent Hargaden, 2021. "Development of a Hybrid Simulation Framework for the Production Planning Process in the Atlantic Salmon Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    8. Justus Wesseler, 2022. "The EU's farm‐to‐fork strategy: An assessment from the perspective of agricultural economics," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1826-1843, December.
    9. Konstantinos Giannakas & Murray Fulton, 2020. "On the market for “Lemons”: quality provision in markets with asymmetric information," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6, December.
    10. Ge, Houtian & Gray, Richard & Nolan, James, 2015. "Agricultural supply chain optimization and complexity: A comparison of analytic vs simulated solutions and policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 208-220.
    11. Utomo, Dhanan Sarwo & Onggo, Bhakti Stephan & Eldridge, Stephen, 2018. "Applications of agent-based modelling and simulation in the agri-food supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 794-805.
    12. Kingwell, Ross & Loxton, Ryan & Mardaneh, Elham, 2020. "Factors and scenarios affecting a farmer’s grain harvest logistics," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(2), April.
    13. Venus, Thomas J. & Drabik, Dusan & Wesseler, Justus, 2018. "The role of a German multi-stakeholder standard for livestock products derived from non-GMO feed," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 58-67.
    14. Cook, Roberta L. & Calvin, Linda, 2005. "Greenhouse Tomatoes Change the Dynamics of the North American Fresh Tomato Industry," Economic Research Report 7244, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Liu, Elaine M. & Huang, JiKun, 2013. "Risk preferences and pesticide use by cotton farmers in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 202-215.
    16. Ge, Houtian & Nolan, James & Gray, Richard & Goetz, Stephan & Han, Yicheol, 2016. "Supply chain complexity and risk mitigation – A hybrid optimization–simulation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 228-238.
    17. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    18. Yan, Minhao & Ge, Houtian & Gomez, Miguel I., 2023. "Risk Management Strategy of Food Safety: The Case of the US Fresh Produce Supply Chain," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335580, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Taylor, Edward J. & Yunez-Naude, Antonio & Paredes, Fernando Barceinas & Dyer, George, 2004. "Transition Policy and the Structure of the Agriculture of Mexico," 2004 NAAMIC Workshop I: North American Agrifood Market Integration: Current Situation and Perspectives 163857, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    20. Kerr, William A., 2005. "NAFTA’s Underdeveloped Institutions: Did They Contribute to the BSE Crisis?," 2005 NAAMIC Workshop II: Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration under Stress 163863, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:106-:d:467662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.