IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3700-d353626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Density and Diversity of Human Activity in the Built Environment: The Case of the Pearl River Delta, China

Author

Listed:
  • Miaoxi Zhao

    (Department of Urban Planning & State Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Gaofeng Xu

    (Department of Urban Planning, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Martin de Jong

    (Erasmus School of Law & Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Postbus 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Xinjian Li

    (School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6907, Australia)

  • Pingcheng Zhang

    (Department of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization in China has been accompanied by spatial inefficiency in patterns of human activity, of which ‘ghost towns’ are the most visible result. In this study, we measure the density and diversity of human activity in the built environment and relate this to various explanatory factors. Using the Pearl River Delta (PRD) as an empirical case, our research demonstrates the distribution of human activity by multi-source data and then explores its dynamics within these areas. This empirical study is comprised of two parts. The first part explores location information regarding human activity in urbanized areas and shows density and diversity. Regression models are applied to explore how density and diversity are affected by urban scale, morphology and by a city’s administrative level. Results indicate that: 1) cities with smaller populations are more likely to be faced with lower density and diversity, but they derive greater marginal benefits from improving land use efficiency; 2) the compactness of the layout of urban land, an index reflecting the plane shapes of the built environment, is highly correlated with density and diversity in built-up areas; and 3) the administrative importance of a city has a significant and positive impact on the density of human activity, but no obvious influence on its diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Miaoxi Zhao & Gaofeng Xu & Martin de Jong & Xinjian Li & Pingcheng Zhang, 2020. "Examining the Density and Diversity of Human Activity in the Built Environment: The Case of the Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3700-:d:353626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3700/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3700/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henderson, J V, 1974. "The Sizes and Types of Cities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(4), pages 640-656, September.
    2. Jiqun Wen & Xiaowei Chuai & Shanchi Li & Song Song & Yuanwei Li & Mengjie Wang & Shuosheng Wu, 2019. "Spatial Heterogeneity of the Carbon Emission Effect Resulting from Urban Expansion among Three Coastal Agglomerations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Loris Servillo & Rob Atkinson & Abdelillah Hamdouch & Abdelillah Hamdouch & Christophe Demaziere & Ksenija Banovac, 2017. "The Socio-Economic Profiles of Small and Medium-Sized Towns: Insights from European Case Studies," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(4), pages 456-471, September.
    4. Houkai WEI, 2015. "The Administrative Hierarchy and Growth of Urban Scale in China," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(01), pages 1-21.
    5. Jacques, Cynthia & Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, 2014. "Does travel behavior matter in defining urban form? A quantitative analysis characterizing distinct areas within a region," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14.
    6. Wheaton, William C., 1998. "Land Use and Density in Cities with Congestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 258-272, March.
    7. Hualin Xie & Wei Wang, 2015. "Exploring the Spatial-Temporal Disparities of Urban Land Use Economic Efficiency in China and Its Influencing Factors under Environmental Constraints Based on a Sequential Slacks-Based Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Mariano Kulish & Anthony Richards & Christian Gillitzer, 2012. "Urban Structure and Housing Prices: Some Evidence from Australian Cities," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(282), pages 303-322, September.
    9. Marco Zitti & Carlotta Ferrara & Luigi Perini & Margherita Carlucci & Luca Salvati, 2015. "Long-Term Urban Growth and Land Use Efficiency in Southern Europe: Implications for Sustainable Land Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, March.
    10. TANNIER, Cécile & THOMAS, Isabelle, 2013. "Defining and characterizing urban boundaries: a fractal analysis of theoretical cities and Belgian cities," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2521, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    11. J�rn Messeter, 2015. "Social Media Use as Urban Acupuncture for Empowering Socially Challenged Communities," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 79-96, July.
    12. Hongtao Ma & Yuan Meng & Hanfa Xing & Cansong Li, 2019. "Investigating Road-Constrained Spatial Distributions and Semantic Attractiveness for Area of Interest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Jinlong Gao & Yehua Dennis Wei & Wen Chen & Komali Yenneti, 2015. "Urban Land Expansion and Structural Change in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-27, July.
    14. Aspa Gospodini, 2001. "Urban Design, Urban Space Morphology, Urban Tourism: An Emerging New Paradigm Concerning Their Relationship," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(7), pages 925-934, October.
    15. Lee, Sungwon & Lee, Bumsoo, 2014. "The influence of urban form on GHG emissions in the U.S. household sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 534-549.
    16. Qianyi Wang & Ran Li & Kee Cheok Cheong, 2019. "Shandong’s Yintan Town and China’s “Ghost City” Phenomenon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bowen Xiang & Rushuang Chen & Gaofeng Xu, 2022. "Uncovering Network Heterogeneity of China’s Three Major Urban Agglomerations from Hybrid Space Perspective-Based on TikTok Check-In Records," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jiewei & Lu, Ming & Lu, Tianyi, 2022. "Constructing compact cities: How urban regeneration can enhance growth and relieve congestion," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Zhang, Wenjia & Kockelman, Kara M., 2016. "Optimal policies in cities with congestion and agglomeration externalities: Congestion tolls, labor subsidies, and place-based strategies," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-86.
    3. Yang Song & Kevin R. Gurney, 2020. "The Relationship between On-Road FFCO 2 Emissions and Socio-Economic/Urban Form Factors for Global Cities: Significance, Robustness and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Xiaodong Yang & Yongxiang Wu & Hang Dang, 2017. "Urban Land Use Efficiency and Coordination in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Jin, Jangik & Rafferty, Peter, 2017. "Does congestion negatively affect income growth and employment growth? Empirical evidence from US metropolitan regions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-8.
    6. Min Liu & Xiaoma Li & Ding Song & Hui Zhai, 2021. "Evaluation and Monitoring of Urban Public Greenspace Planning Using Landscape Metrics in Kunming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Yingchao Lin & Yongle Li & Zhili Ma, 2018. "Exploring the Interactive Development between Population Urbanization and Land Urbanization: Evidence from Chongqing, China (1998–2016)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Zhu, Xinhua & Li, Yan & Zhang, Peifeng & Wei, Yigang & Zheng, Xuyang & Xie, Lingling, 2019. "Temporal–spatial characteristics of urban land use efficiency of China’s 35mega cities based on DEA: Decomposing technology and scale efficiency," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Rhee, Hyok-Joo & Yu, Sanggyun & Hirte, Georg, 2014. "Zoning in cities with traffic congestion and agglomeration economies," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 82-93.
    10. Samaneh Sadat Nickayin & Antonio Tomao & Giovanni Quaranta & Luca Salvati & Antonio Gimenez Morera, 2020. "Going toward Resilience? Town Planning, Peri-Urban Landscapes, and the Expansion of Athens, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Bosker, Maarten & Brakman, Steven & Garretsen, Harry & Schramm, Marc, 2008. "A century of shocks: The evolution of the German city size distribution 1925-1999," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 330-347, July.
    12. Klein, Alexander & Leunig, Tim, 2013. "Gibrat’s Law and the British Industrial Revolution," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 146, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    13. Acocella Nicola & Di Bartolomeo Giovanni, 2013. "Population location, commuting and local public goods: A political economy approach," wp.comunite 0105, Department of Communication, University of Teramo.
    14. Rui Baptista & Joana Mendonça, 2010. "Proximity to knowledge sources and the location of knowledge-based start-ups," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(1), pages 5-29, August.
    15. Luc Christiaensen & Ravi Kanbur, 2017. "Secondary Towns and Poverty Reduction: Refocusing the Urbanization Agenda," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 405-419, October.
    16. Esposito, Piero & Patriarca, Fabrizio & Salvati, Luca, 2018. "Tertiarization and land use change: The case of Italy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 80-86.
    17. Lei Wan & Huiyu Liu & Haibo Gong & Yujia Ren, 2020. "Effects of Climate and Land Use changes on Vegetation Dynamics in the Yangtze River Delta, China Based on Abrupt Change Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    18. BOURDEAU-LEPAGE, Lise & HURIOT, Jean-Marie, 2006. "Megacities vs. Global Cities. The institutional hypothesis," LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2006-05, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne.
    19. Xinkuo Xu & Liyan Han, 2017. "Diverse Effects of Consumer Credit on Household Carbon Emissions at Quantiles: Evidence from Urban China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-25, September.
    20. Takatoshi Tabuchi & Jacques-François Thisse, 2006. "Regional Specialization, Urban Hierarchy, And Commuting Costs," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1295-1317, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3700-:d:353626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.