IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3212-d346094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Critical Factors That Encourage Private Partners to Participate in Sports and Leisure Characteristic Town Public-Private Partnerships: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Chen

    (School of Economics and Management Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1 Zhanlanguan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Yaqi Zhao

    (School of Economics and Management Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1 Zhanlanguan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Xia Zhou

    (School of Economics and Management Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1 Zhanlanguan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Lin Zhang

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, 1000 Fengming Road, Licheng District, Jinan 250101, China)

Abstract

The Sports and Leisure Characteristic Town (SLCT) has become a reasonable strategy for enhancing the sustainability of new urbanization processes in rural China. Although the Chinese government has issued a series of policies to support the development of SLCTs, limited financial resources are a major obstacle. Thus, public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been increasingly encouraged for establishing SLCT projects. However, the factors that significantly influence private partners’ willingness to participate in SLCT PPP projects remain unclear. The authors of this paper conducted expert interviews and questionnaire surveys concerning the SLCT PPP projects that have been implemented in China, identifying 23 factors that can be grouped into five major components using principal component factor analysis. Multiple linear regression was then performed to evaluate the relationships between factors and private partners’ willingness to participate. The results indicated that the factors that critically influence private partners’ willingness to participate include stakeholder factors, the internal factors of private partners, external environmental risk factors, the supporting measure factors of SLCTs, and the locational factors of SLCTs. This work also offers suggestions for encouraging private partners to participate in SLCT PPP projects. This study can provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for government and private partners in order to help them implement sustainable SLCT PPP projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Chen & Yaqi Zhao & Xia Zhou & Lin Zhang, 2020. "Investigating Critical Factors That Encourage Private Partners to Participate in Sports and Leisure Characteristic Town Public-Private Partnerships: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3212-:d:346094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3212/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3212/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadia Tecco, 2008. "Financially sustainable investments in developing countries water sectors: what conditions could promote private sector involvement?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 129-142, June.
    2. Athena Panayiotou & Francesca Medda, 2014. "Attracting private sector participation in infrastructure investment: the UK case," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 425-431, November.
    3. Sarkar, Sudipto, 2012. "Attracting private investment: Tax reduction, investment subsidy, or both?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1780-1785.
    4. Jing Du & Hongyue Wu & Ruoyu Jin, 2019. "Capital Structure of Public–Private Partnership Projects: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Swee Lean Chan & Moonseo Park, 2005. "Project cost estimation using principal component regression," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 295-304.
    6. Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska & Joanna Węgrzyn, 2019. "Understanding of Public–Private Partnership Stakeholders as a Condition of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Yan Wang & Yibin Ao & Yuting Zhang & Yan Liu & Lei Zhao & Yunfeng Chen, 2019. "Impact of the Built Environment and Bicycling Psychological Factors on the Acceptable Bicycling Distance of Rural Residents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Rosa Mato‐Amboage & Jonathan W. Pitchford & Julia Touza, 2019. "Public–Private Partnerships for Biosecurity: An Opportunity for Risk Sharing," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 771-788, September.
    9. Enrico Pennings, "undated". "How to Maximize Domestic Benefits from Irreversible Foreign Investments," Working Papers 205, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    10. Geddes, R. Richard & Reeves, Eoin, 2017. "The favourability of U.S. PPP enabling legislation and private investment in transportation infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 157-165.
    11. Pennings, Enrico, 2005. "How to maximize domestic benefits from foreign investments: the effect of irreversibility and uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 873-889, May.
    12. Akintola Akintoye, 2000. "Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 77-89.
    13. Erwin Heurkens & Fred Hobma, 2014. "Private Sector-led Urban Development Projects: Comparative Insights from Planning Practices in the Netherlands and the UK," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 350-369, August.
    14. Axel Marx, 2019. "Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Exploring Their Design and Its Impact on Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-9, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Fleta‐Asín & Fernando Muñoz, 2021. "Renewable energy public–private partnerships in developing countries: Determinants of private investment," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 653-670, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Corato, 2016. "Investment stimuli under government present-biased time preferences," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 101-111, October.
    2. Renz, André, 2016. "Die Relevanz von Replikationen in der experimentellen Steuerforschung: Eine Replikationsstudie zu Wahrnehmungsverzerrungen bei Subventionen," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 202, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    3. Lukas, Elmar & Thiergart, Sascha, 2019. "The interaction of debt financing, cash grants and the optimal investment policy under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 284-299.
    4. Azevedo, Alcino & Pereira, Paulo J. & Rodrigues, Artur, 2021. "Optimal timing and capacity choice with taxes and subsidies under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Tian, Yuan, 2018. "Optimal policy for attracting FDI: Investment cost subsidy versus tax rate reduction," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 151-159.
    6. Barbosa, Diogo & Carvalho, Vitor M. & Pereira, Paulo J., 2016. "Public stimulus for private investment: An extended real options model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 742-748.
    7. Nyoni, Thabani, 2019. "Cost overrun factors in construction industry: a case of Zimbabwe," MPRA Paper 96788, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Chor, Davin, 2009. "Subsidies for FDI: Implications from a model with heterogeneous firms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 113-125, June.
    9. Sarkar, Sudipto, 2012. "Attracting private investment: Tax reduction, investment subsidy, or both?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1780-1785.
    10. Yingjie Niu & Jinqiang Yang & Siqi Zhao, 2022. "Robust stimulus of private investment: Tax rate cut or investment subsidy?," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 18(3), pages 339-357, September.
    11. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    12. Yubo Guo & Igor Martek & Chuan Chen, 2019. "Policy Evolution in the Chinese PPP Market: The Shifting Strategies of Governmental Support Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Giacomo Corneo & Sergio Vergalli, 2016. "Taxes, subsidies, regulation in dynamic models," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 97-99, October.
    14. Di Corato, Luca & Maoz, Yishay D., 2019. "Production externalities and investment caps: A welfare analysis under uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Anna Danielova & Sudipto Sarkar, 2011. "The effect of leverage on the tax‐cut versus investment‐subsidy argument," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 123-129, November.
    16. Huige Xing & Yuelin Li & Hongyang Li, 2020. "Renegotiation Strategy of Public-Private Partnership Projects with Asymmetric Information—An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Tan, Yingxian & Pan, Zhihao & Wang, Rui & Wen, Chunhui, 2023. "Macroeconomic conditions and investment stimuli," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    18. Danielova, Anna & Sarkar, Sudipto, 2011. "The effect of leverage on the tax-cut versus investment-subsidy argument," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 123-129.
    19. Aneta Bobenič Hintošová & František Sudzina & Terézia Barlašová, 2021. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Investment Incentives in Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, February.
    20. Joyeeta Gupta & Aarti Gupta & Courtney Vegelin, 2022. "Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 393-409, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3212-:d:346094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.