IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p2056-d329616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Different Parking Pricing Strategies: A Simulation-based Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenyu Mei

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Chi Feng

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Liang Kong

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Lihui Zhang

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Jun Chen

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjin 210096, China)

Abstract

Parking demand exceeding parking supply and uneven parking demand distribution are the existing conflicts in city centers. Parking pricing is frequently utilized to manage parking resources. This study aims to assess different parking pricing strategies through simulations for providing operational suggestions for urban parking managers. Two widely used parking pricing strategies in China combined with an optimized parking pricing strategy are proposed and compared. We introduce an agent-based simulation system to describe the parking and traffic conditions. Various measures of effectiveness under different parking pricing strategies can be obtained via agent-based simulations. We then construct a comprehensive benefit combining average cost and failure rate. Results show that the second strategy with charging different parking fees by considering locations and third optimized strategy can effectively improve traffic efficiency. However, the second strategy may lead to higher average cost than that of the third one. Thus, the third optimized strategy performs the best and can be used to optimize the parking policy of parking managers in the future. The entire assessment through simulations can provide evaluation suggestions for parking managers to adjust parking policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenyu Mei & Chi Feng & Liang Kong & Lihui Zhang & Jun Chen, 2020. "Assessment of Different Parking Pricing Strategies: A Simulation-based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2056-:d:329616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2056/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2056/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jansson, Jan Owen, 2010. "Road pricing and parking policy," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 346-353.
    2. Gao, Ge & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Liu, Xinmin & Chen, Weiya, 2018. "Park-and-ride service design under a price-based tradable credits scheme in a linear monocentric city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Bonsall, Peter & Young, William, 2010. "Is there a case for replacing parking charges by road user charges?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 323-334, September.
    4. Andrew Kelly, J. & Peter Clinch, J., 2006. "Influence of varied parking tariffs on parking occupancy levels by trip purpose," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 487-495, November.
    5. Mei, Zhenyu & Feng, Chi & Ding, Wenchao & Zhang, Lihui & Wang, Dianhai, 2019. "Better lucky than rich? Comparative analysis of parking reservation and parking charge," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 47-56.
    6. Rodier, Caroline J & Shaheen, Susan A & Eaken, Amanda M, 2005. "Transit-Based Smart Parking in the San Francisco Bay Area, California: Assessment of User Demand and Behavioral Effects," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3kw2x3x8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Lam, William H.K. & Li, Zhi-Chun & Huang, Hai-Jun & Wong, S.C., 2006. "Modeling time-dependent travel choice problems in road networks with multiple user classes and multiple parking facilities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 368-395, June.
    8. Tsamboulas, Dimitrios A., 2001. "Parking fare thresholds: a policy tool," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 115-124, April.
    9. Dale, Simon & Frost, Matthew & Ison, Stephen & Quddus, Mohammed & Warren, Mr Peter, 2017. "Evaluating the impact of a workplace parking levy on local traffic congestion: The case of Nottingham UK," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 153-164.
    10. Wang, Rui & Yuan, Quan, 2013. "Parking practices and policies under rapid motorization: The case of China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 109-116.
    11. Wilson, Richard W., 1992. "Estimating the travel and parking demand effects of employer-paid parking," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 133-145, March.
    12. Zhang, Rong & Zhu, Lichao, 2016. "Curbside parking pricing in a city centre using a threshold," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 16-27.
    13. Yifei Cai & Jun Chen & Chu Zhang & Bin Wang, 2018. "A Parking Space Allocation Method to Make a Shared Parking Strategy for Appertaining Parking Lots of Public Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Premaratne Samaranayake & Upul Gunawardana, 2022. "Parking Assessment in the Context of Growing Construction Activity and Infrastructure Changes: Simulation of Impact Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Maciej Kozłowski & Andrzej Czerepicki & Piotr Jaskowski & Kamil Aniszewski, 2021. "Analysis of the System of Controlling Paid Parking Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    4. Sheng-Ming Wang & Wei-Min Cheng, 2023. "Fast Way to Predict Parking Lots Availability: For Shared Parking Lots Based on Dynamic Parking Fee System," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mei, Zhenyu & Feng, Chi & Ding, Wenchao & Zhang, Lihui & Wang, Dianhai, 2019. "Better lucky than rich? Comparative analysis of parking reservation and parking charge," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 47-56.
    2. Caicedo, Felix & Diaz, Alejandra, 2013. "Case analysis of simultaneous concessions of parking meters and underground parking facilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 358-378.
    3. Kelly, J. Andrew & Clinch, J. Peter, 2009. "Temporal variance of revealed preference on-street parking price elasticity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 193-199, August.
    4. Inci, Eren, 2015. "A review of the economics of parking," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 50-63.
    5. Zipeng Zhang & Ning Zhang, 2021. "Early Bird Scheme for Parking Management: How Does Parking Play a Role in the Morning Commute Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Fullerton & E. Pallarez & Walke, 2015. "Downtown parking meter demand in a border metropolitan economy," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(48), pages 5121-5130, October.
    7. Wang, Hao & Li, Ruimin & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Shang, Pan, 2020. "Effect of on-street parking pricing policies on parking characteristics: A case study of Nanning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 65-78.
    8. Gallo, Mariano & D'Acierno, Luca & Montella, Bruno, 2011. "A multilayer model to simulate cruising for parking in urban areas," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 735-744, September.
    9. Simićević, Jelena & Vukanović, Smiljan & Milosavljević, Nada, 2013. "The effect of parking charges and time limit to car usage and parking behaviour," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 125-131.
    10. Chengxiang Zhuge & Chunfu Shao & Xia Li, 2019. "Empirical Analysis of Parking Behaviour of Conventional and Electric Vehicles for Parking Modelling: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Premaratne Samaranayake & Upul Gunawardana & Michael Stokoe, 2023. "Kerbside Parking Assessment Using a Simulation Modelling Approach for Infrastructure Planning—A Metropolitan City Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Mo, Baichuan & Kong, Hui & Wang, Hao & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Li, Ruimin, 2021. "Impact of pricing policy change on on-street parking demand and user satisfaction: A case study in Nanning, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 445-469.
    13. Ahmadi Azari, Kian & Arintono, Sulistyo & Hamid, Hussain & Rahmat, Riza Atiq O.K., 2013. "Modelling demand under parking and cordon pricing policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-9.
    14. Chandra, Shailesh & Naik, R. Thirumaleswara & Venkatesh, Manoj & Mudgal, Abhisek, 2021. "Accessibility evaluations of the proposed road user charge (RUC) program in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 12-26.
    15. Ottosson, Dadi Baldur & Chen, Cynthia & Wang, Tingting & Lin, Haiyun, 2013. "The sensitivity of on-street parking demand in response to price changes: A case study in Seattle, WA," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 222-232.
    16. Jun Li & Sifan Wu & Xiaoman Feng, 2021. "Optimization of On-Street Parking Charges Based on Price Elasticity of the Expected Perceived Parking Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    17. Milosavljević, Nada & Simićević, Jelena, 2016. "User response to parking policy change: A comparison of stated and revealed preference data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 40-45.
    18. Oliver Shyr & Kuo-Chun Wu, 2011. "An Assessment of Parking Fare Rate Deregulation in Taipei," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(10), pages 2069-2083, August.
    19. Tian, Qiong & Yang, Li & Wang, Chenlan & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "Dynamic pricing for reservation-based parking system: A revenue management method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 36-44.
    20. Ardeshiri, Ali & Safarighouzhdi, Farshid & Hossein Rashidi, Taha, 2021. "Measuring willingness to pay for shared parking," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 186-202.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2056-:d:329616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.