IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p1986-d328773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Sustainable Socioeconomic Development in European Union Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Viktorija Skvarciany

    (Department of Economics Engineering, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius 10221, Lithuania)

  • Daiva Jurevičienė

    (Department of Economics Engineering, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius 10221, Lithuania)

  • Gintarė Volskytė

    (Department of Economics Engineering, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius 10221, Lithuania)

Abstract

There are still debates in the scientific literature about the factors influencing countries’ sustainable socioeconomic development. Therefore, the current article aims at determining the factors of sustainable socioeconomic development and assessing its level in the EU countries. The following methods were employed for the research: an evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). EDAS was used to reveal which countries have the highest level of sustainable socioeconomic development, and which have the lowest. The ranking was done based on the appraisal score, which is an outcome of EDAS. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was used for clustering the countries based on the appraisal scores in order to distinguish groups of countries having a similar level of sustainable socioeconomic development. The results revealed that the highest level of sustainable socioeconomic development is in Germany, and the lowest in Portugal. Based on HCA, the countries were divided into three groups. The first cluster’s countries have the weakest sustainable socioeconomic development, and countries assigned to the third cluster have the best. In the current research, the third cluster consists of one country, Germany, which supports the results obtained with the EDAS method, i.e., Germany is the country with the highest level of sustainable socioeconomic development in the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Viktorija Skvarciany & Daiva Jurevičienė & Gintarė Volskytė, 2020. "Assessment of Sustainable Socioeconomic Development in European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1986-:d:328773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1986/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1986/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rugani, Benedetto & Marvuglia, Antonino & Pulselli, Federico Maria, 2018. "Predicting Sustainable Economic Welfare – Analysis and perspectives for Luxembourg based on energy policy scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 288-303.
    2. Nadiia Shmygol & Olga Galtsova & Iryna Varlamova, 2018. "Developing A Methodology To Assess The Environmental And Economic Performance Index Based On International Research To Resolve The Economic And Environmental Problems Of Ukraine," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(4).
    3. Minna Halme & Maria Korpela, 2014. "Responsible Innovation Toward Sustainable Development in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: a Resource Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(8), pages 547-566, December.
    4. Ssebunya, Brian Robert & Schader, Christian & Baumgart, Lukas & Landert, Jan & Altenbuchner, Christine & Schmid, Erwin & Stolze, Matthias, 2019. "Sustainability Performance of Certified and Non-certified Smallholder Coffee Farms in Uganda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 35-47.
    5. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica & Antomil-Ibias, José, 2014. "Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-17.
    6. Jan Cadil & Karel Mirosnik & Ludmila Petkovova & Michal Mirvald, 2018. "Public Support of Private R&D–Effects on Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Torsten Schroeder, 2018. "Giving Meaning to the Concept of Sustainability in Architectural Design Practices: Setting Out the Analytical Framework of Translation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna & Kędzierska-Szczepaniak, Angelika & Szczepaniak, Krzysztof & Cheba, Katarzyna & Gajda, Waldemar & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2018. "Innovation in sustainable development: an investigation of the EU context using 2030 agenda indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 251-262.
    9. Michal Bernard Pietrzak & Adam P. Balcerzak, 2016. "Assessment of Socio-Economic Sustainability in New European Union Members States in the years 2004-2012," Chapters, in: Monika Papiez & Slawomir Smiech (ed.),The 10th Professor Aleksander Zelias International Conference on Modelling and Forecasting of Socio-Economic Phenomena. Conference Proceedings, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 13, pages 120-129, Institute of Economic Research.
    10. Emilia Madudova & Tatiana Čorejova & Marek Valica, 2018. "Economic Sustainability in a Wider Context: Case Study of Considerable ICT Sector Sub-Divisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Tadić, Snežana & Krstić, Mladen & Brnjac, Nikolina, 2019. "Selection of efficient types of inland intermodal terminals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 170-180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nutthawut Ritmak & Wanchai Rattanawong & Varin Vongmanee, 2022. "The Dynamic Evaluation Model of Health Sustainability under MCDM Benchmarking Health Indicator Standards," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Alberta Tahiri & Idriz Kovaçi & Anka Trajkovska Petkoska, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism as a Potential for Promotion of Regional Heritage, Local Food, Traditions, and Diversity—Case of Kosovo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Stefaniec, Agnieszka & Hosseini, Keyvan & Assani, Saeed & Hosseini, Seyed Maziar & Li, Yongjun, 2021. "Social sustainability of regional transportation: An assessment framework with application to EU road transport," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Xiangfei Ma & Inna Gryshova & Viktoriia Khaustova & Olena Reshetnyak & Maryna Shcherbata & Denys Bobrovnyk & Mykyta Khaustov, 2022. "Assessment of the Impact of Scientific and Technical Activities on the Economic Growth of World Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-35, November.
    5. Irena Pyka & Aleksandra Nocoń, 2021. "Responsible Lending Policy of Green Investments in the Energy Sector in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Pereira, Javier & Contreras, Pedro & Morais, Danielle C. & Arroyo-López, Pilar, 2022. "A multi-criteria and stochastic robustness analysis approach to compare nations sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Håvard Hegre & Kristina Petrova & Nina von Uexkull, 2020. "Synergies and Trade-Offs in Reaching the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cinzia Battistella & Maria Rosita Cagnina & Lucia Cicero & Nadia Preghenella, 2018. "Sustainable Business Models of SMEs: Challenges in Yacht Tourism Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    3. Yuhuan Jin & Sheng Zhang, 2019. "Credit Rationing in Small and Micro Enterprises: A Theoretical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Filip Škultéty & Dominika Beňová & Jozef Gnap, 2021. "City Logistics as an Imperative Smart City Mechanism: Scrutiny of Clustered EU27 Capitals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Idiano D'Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Ilhan Ozturk, 2023. "The sustainable development of mobility in the green transition: Renewable energy, local industrial chain, and battery recycling," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 840-852, April.
    6. Franceschini, Fiorenzo & Maisano, Domenico, 2015. "Checking the consistency of the solution in ordinal semi-democratic decision-making problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PB), pages 188-195.
    7. Jindřich Špička & Tomáš Vintr & Renata Aulová & Jana Macháčková, 2020. "Trade-off between the economic and environmental sustainability in Czech dual farm structure," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(6), pages 243-250.
    8. María E. Aguilar-Fernández & José Ramon Otegi-Olaso, 2018. "Firm Size and the Business Model for Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Gómez-Limón, José A. & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Riesgo, Laura, 2016. "Modeling at farm level: Positive Multi-Attribute Utility Programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 17-27.
    10. Cui, Li & Chan, Hing Kai & Zhou, Yizhuo & Dai, Jing & Lim, Jia Jia, 2019. "Exploring critical factors of green business failure based on Grey-Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 450-461.
    11. Jaros³aw Brodny & Magdalena Tutak, 2023. "The level of implementing sustainable development goal "Industry, innovation and infrastructure" of Agenda 2030 in the European Union countries: Application of MCDM methods," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 47-102, March.
    12. Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández & Manuel Escobar-Farfán, 2022. "Zero-Waste Management and Sustainable Consumption: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Olgun Aydin & Bartłomiej Igliński & Krzysztof Krukowski & Marek Siemiński, 2022. "Analyzing Wind Energy Potential Using Efficient Global Optimization: A Case Study for the City Gdańsk in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Janoskova Katarina & Kral Pavol, 2019. "National innovative performance and sustainable development – the case of Slovakia," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 28-37, May.
    15. Genus, Audley & Iskandarova, Marfuga, 2018. "Responsible innovation: its institutionalisation and a critique," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-9.
    16. Henk J. Steinz & Frank J. Van Rijnsoever & Frans Nauta, 2016. "How to Green the red Dragon: A Start‐ups' Little Helper for Sustainable Development in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8), pages 593-608, December.
    17. Kai Ding & Pingyu Jiang & Mei Zheng, 2017. "Environmental and economic sustainability-aware resource service scheduling for industrial product service systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1303-1316, August.
    18. Irene L. Bahena-Álvarez & Eulogio Cordón-Pozo & Alejandro Delgado-Cruz, 2019. "Social Entrepreneurship in the Conduct of Responsible Innovation: Analysis Cluster in Mexican SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Benedetti, Ilaria & Crescenzi, Federico, 2023. "The role of income poverty and inequality indicators at regional level: An evaluation for Italy and Germany," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    20. Mª Eugenia López‐Pérez & Iguácel Melero & F Javier Sese, 2017. "Management for Sustainable Development and Its Impact on Firm Value in the SME Context: Does Size Matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 985-999, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1986-:d:328773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.