IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8237-d424429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enterprise Architecture and Organizational Benefits: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Farrukh Saleem

    (Information Systems Department, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Bahjat Fakieh

    (Information Systems Department, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Enterprise architecture (EA) is a framework that consists of multiple processes to align business strategies with information technology (IT) architecture. It helps the organization standardize business operations and incorporate systems in different layers to achieve business goals and organizational benefits. This study focuses on identifying organizational benefits that can be achieved through EA implementation. The study comprises three main phases: (i) benefits realization (from literature review), (ii) benefits reconfirmation (from EA experts), and (iii) benefits validation (through a case study). Specifically, the benefits considered in this study are related to EA products, services, and strategies are known as: (i) business agility, (ii) creating competitive advantage, and (iii) increasing value. The study covers a vast literature review to define the current status of EA and organizational benefits. In addition, the study incorporates a number of measuring factors for each EA benefits with the help of a literature review. The initial findings reconfirmed and modified based on the experts’ opinions collected through interview sessions. The research applied the grounded theory and qualitative approach to analyze the interview sessions. Accordingly, using the experts’ advice, we proposed a model to show the steps and guidelines for assessing EA organizational benefits using corresponding measuring factors and sub-criteria. Finally, the proposed model validated through an in-depth case study to get final confirmation and see the model fits reality. Overall, this research highlight the potential benefits an organization can achieve from EA framework implementation. The proposed framework can assist EA decision-makers to understand and realize the EA benefits and its assessment process.

Suggested Citation

  • Farrukh Saleem & Bahjat Fakieh, 2020. "Enterprise Architecture and Organizational Benefits: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8237-:d:424429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8237/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8237/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hazen, Benjamin T. & Bradley, Randy V. & Bell, John E. & In, Joonhwan & Byrd, Terry A., 2017. "Enterprise architecture: A competence-based approach to achieving agility and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 566-577.
    2. Hafsi Mouaad & Saïd Assar, 2016. "What enterprise architecture can bring for digital transformation? An exploratory study," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01416312, HAL.
    3. Ralph Foorthuis & Marlies Steenbergen & Sjaak Brinkkemper & Wiel A. G. Bruls, 2016. "A theory building study of enterprise architecture practices and benefits," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 541-564, June.
    4. O'Cass, Aron & Sok, Phyra, 2013. "Exploring innovation driven value creation in B2B service firms: The roles of the manager, employees, and customers in value creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1074-1084.
    5. Schmidt, C. & Buxmann, Peter, 2011. "Outcomes and success factors of enterprise IT architecture management: empirical insight from the international financial services industry," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 48401, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. Mouaad Hafsi & Saïd Assar, 2016. "What enterprise architecture can bring for digital transformation? An exploratory study," Post-Print hal-01416312, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Möhring & Barbara Keller & Rainer Schmidt & Kurt Sandkuhl & Alfred Zimmermann, 2023. "Digitalization and enterprise architecture management: a perspective on benefits and challenges," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Tihana Koprivnjak & Sunčica Oberman Peterka, 2020. "Business Model as a Base for Building Firms’ Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rogier van de Wetering & Tom Hendrickx & Sjaak Brinkkemper & Sherah Kurnia, 2021. "The Impact of EA-Driven Dynamic Capabilities, Innovativeness, and Structure on Organizational Benefits: A Variance and fsQCA Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Aurona Gerber & Pierre le Roux & Alta van der Merwe, 2020. "Enterprise Architecture as Explanatory Information Systems Theory for Understanding Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprise Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
    3. Ayed Alwadain, 2020. "Enterprise Architecture: A Business Value Realization Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Rogier van de Wetering & Sherah Kurnia & Svyatoslav Kotusev, 2020. "The Effect of Enterprise Architecture Deployment Practices on Organizational Benefits: A Dynamic Capability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Negin Banaeianjahromi & Kari Smolander, 2019. "Lack of Communication and Collaboration in Enterprise Architecture Development," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 877-908, August.
    6. Yiwei Gong & Marijn Janssen, 2023. "Why Organizations Fail in Implementing Enterprise Architecture Initiatives?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1401-1419, August.
    7. Eetu Niemi & Samuli Pekkola, 2020. "The Benefits of Enterprise Architecture in Organizational Transformation," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(6), pages 585-597, December.
    8. Gong, Yiwei & Janssen, Marijn, 2019. "The value of and myths about enterprise architecture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-9.
    9. Ahmed Hamdi & Tarik Saikouk & Bouchaib Bahli, 2020. "Facing supply chain disruptions: enhancers of supply chain resiliency," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 2943-2958.
    10. Georgios Giotis & Evangelia Papadionysiou, 2022. "The Role of Managerial and Technological Innovations in the Tourism Industry: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    12. Seogjun Lee & Seung Woon Oh & Kichan Nam, 2016. "Transformational and Transactional Factors for the Successful Implementation of Enterprise Architecture in Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Lie Heng & Nur Afifah, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Orientation for Enhancement of Marketing Performance," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 46-53.
    14. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    15. V Kumar & Amalesh Sharma & Shaphali Gupta, 2017. "Accessing the influence of strategic marketing research on generating impact: moderating roles of models, journals, and estimation approaches," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 164-185, March.
    16. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Gupta, Himanshu & Kunc, Martin, 2021. "Risks associated with the implementation of big data analytics in sustainable supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    17. Ritu Singh & Parikshit Charan & Manojit Chattopadhyay, 2019. "Dynamic capabilities and responsiveness: moderating effect of organization structures and environmental dynamism," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(4), pages 301-319, December.
    18. Mircea Fulea & Bogdan Mocan & Mihai Dragomir & Mircea Murar, 2023. "On Increasing Service Organizations’ Agility: An Artifact-Based Framework to Elicit Improvement Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    19. Douglas Cumming & Sofia Johan & Denis Schweizer, 2017. "Information systems, agency problems, and fraud," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 421-424, June.
    20. Ta-Wei Tang & Michael Wang & Ya-Yun Tang, 2015. "Developing service innovation capability in the hotel industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 9(1), pages 97-113, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8237-:d:424429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.